TSJ Director Movement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

OK AB! What league will your teams be playing in next year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

BP stepped into FCV and VDA at their peaks. The players were already there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

Coach22? You actually believe he sent “22 players to YNT”?

NVSC, LMVSC, and SYC do not have 22 youth national team players combined in their histories.

You people believe anything. Have to give Gym Bro Coach some credit though. He can sell!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

Change the word from DEVELOPED to RECRUITED and you are right.

[Anonymous]

Why is AB taking shots in his insta account saying the grass is greener on the other side because “it’s fake”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.

BP has players to send. STJ does not.

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top.

Change the word from DEVELOPED to RECRUITED and you are right.

DEVELOPED and RECRUITED. You people need to get over it. Most players don’t end at the club they started with. Some do but it’s a really low number. Most kids change clubs once or twice. Especially the elite players.

[Anonymous]

None of these kids 22 is posting film and videos with are going to leave their current program for bottom bins / demotable GA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of these kids 22 is posting film and videos with are going to leave their current program for bottom bins / demotable GA

Are people going to Coach 22 trainings still? Hopefully actual TSJ players are getting practice time at the field and coach 22 isnt prioritizing his own business first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of these kids 22 is posting film and videos with are going to leave their current program for bottom bins / demotable GA

Are people going to Coach 22 trainings still? Hopefully actual TSJ players are getting practice time at the field and coach 22 isnt prioritizing his own business first.

Coach 22 can do both….

[Anonymous]

why arent all the parents blasting on DB doing the same for JO. Also leaving an org mid-year. Twice

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why arent all the parents blasting on DB doing the same for JO. Also leaving an org mid-year. Twice

That happened plenty on the FVU related threads. This is about TSJ.

[Anonymous]

Ok, then 22:
1) What is your plan with all of STJs girls teams in 12th of 12 in the standings for a turn around?
2) What assurances have you received from GA that STJ will not be demoted to ASPIRE?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, then 22:
1) What is your plan with all of STJs girls teams in 12th of 12 in the standings for a turn around?
2) What assurances have you received from GA that STJ will not be demoted to ASPIRE?

As Coach 22s assistant, allow me to address:
1) What is your plan with all of STJs girls teams in 12th of 12 in the standings for a turn around? We plan to supplement lack of field space with Premier Performance training at TSJ flagship. Athletes may get a 20% discount
2) What assurances have you received from GA that STJ will not be demoted to ASPIRE? JO got hired so he can help us get back from Aspire - Oh crud, let the cat out of the bag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, then 22:
1) What is your plan with all of STJs girls teams in 12th of 12 in the standings for a turn around?
2) What assurances have you received from GA that STJ will not be demoted to ASPIRE?

As Coach 22s assistant, allow me to address:
1) What is your plan with all of STJs girls teams in 12th of 12 in the standings for a turn around? We plan to supplement lack of field space with Premier Performance training at TSJ flagship. Athletes may get a 20% discount
2) What assurances have you received from GA that STJ will not be demoted to ASPIRE? JO got hired so he can help us get back from Aspire - Oh crud, let the cat out of the bag.

There was a lot of "confirmed" rumors about them losing GA last year and none of it was true. I doubt any of it will be true again this year. If they were moved down, we would have seen something from GA welcoming them to Aspire.