Reply to TSJ Director Movement

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "TSJ Director Movement"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The idea of STJ suddenly going “homegrown” is… certainly ambitious. Especially considering their, shall we say, limited success with younger teams, the absence of a Fields pipeline, and a developmental history that doesn’t exactly inspire confidence on the boys’ side.
 For example SYC is quietly sitting higher in four of the six age groups (with their B teams) and working with a noticeably stronger player pool seems far more realistically positioned for something like a second homegrown (MLS1) platform. Not that SYC is necessarily asking for one, of course.

So perhaps it might be a good time for STJ   
to take a small step back and reconsider whether this particular vision is truly the hill worth climbing and something that make sense with facts.. STJ  needs to earn their stripes in MLS2 for atleast 2-3 years winning 4-5 age groups to be considered homegrown division.

[/quote]

This is exactly why you bring in a director with national level connections. Outside of BP there really isn’t any coach around here that has sent so many kids to the top.

Their results will be significantly better next season.[/quote]

BP has players to send. STJ does not.[/quote]

BP didn’t have players at first, he DEVELOPED them! That’s why as a club you hire a director that has consistently DEVELOPED and sent over 20 girls to the top. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics