The debate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Democrat, but not under any illusions. Trump is going to mock and ridicule Harris until she gets flustered and resorts to word salads. The shills on CNN and such are going to pretend Harris won, but if the election comes down to the debate, it’s over. Democrats need to get real about this and have a damage control strategy ready. Harris is simply not a good extemporaneous speaker.

If she can't handle Trump, how is she going to handle Xi, Putin, and others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Democrat, but not under any illusions. Trump is going to mock and ridicule Harris until she gets flustered and resorts to word salads. The shills on CNN and such are going to pretend Harris won, but if the election comes down to the debate, it’s over. Democrats need to get real about this and have a damage control strategy ready. Harris is simply not a good extemporaneous speaker.

If she can't handle Trump, how is she going to handle Xi, Putin, and others?

Trump doesn't handle Putin and Xi. Most evidence shows that Putin has used Trump as his puppet. And a new book by one of Trump's advisers talks about how theTrump national security team watched in horror as China's Xi Jinping 'ate his lunch': book. There's no way Kamala could do worse. And she's not a bankrupt real estate mogul trying to make a buck off her position.
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-national-security-team-watched-in-horror-as-china-s-xi-jinping-ate-his-lunch-book/
https://theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/15/kremlin-papers-appear-to-show-putins-plot-to-put-trump-in-white-house

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Democrat, but not under any illusions. Trump is going to mock and ridicule Harris until she gets flustered and resorts to word salads. The shills on CNN and such are going to pretend Harris won, but if the election comes down to the debate, it’s over. Democrats need to get real about this and have a damage control strategy ready. Harris is simply not a good extemporaneous speaker.

If she can't handle Trump, how is she going to handle Xi, Putin, and others?

We need to get back into the habit of electing good leaders. Obviously not happening this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Democrat, but not under any illusions. Trump is going to mock and ridicule Harris until she gets flustered and resorts to word salads. The shills on CNN and such are going to pretend Harris won, but if the election comes down to the debate, it’s over. Democrats need to get real about this and have a damage control strategy ready. Harris is simply not a good extemporaneous speaker.

If she can't handle Trump, how is she going to handle Xi, Putin, and others?

We need to get back into the habit of electing good leaders. Obviously not happening this year.

That's your opinion. Not a fact. Trump is a felon who wouldn't even qualify for a security clearance who was considered Putin's puppet. Many people are excited to vote for Kamala the prosecutor over a felon.

[Anonymous]

She will outshine him with her intelligence, toughness, and communication skills- not that the republicans will be swayed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will outshine him with her intelligence, toughness, and communication skills- not that the republicans will be swayed.

Yup, that's what worries me. Trump was totally outclassed by Hillary Clinton, but he still won. Americans don't like brains. And apparently half our population is cool with an insurrectionist, sexist, bankrupt, state-secret sharing, tax avoiding, draft dodging felon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Above all, Kamala needs to commit to cutting off all aid to Israel.

She’s cannot commit to that at the debate. President Biden’s call.

Actually it’s Congress’s call.

No Congress or Presidential Administration will be cutting off aid to Israel anytime soon. Sources with interests in and close ties to Israel have been donating hundreds of millions of dollars to political campaigns of RNC and DNC candidates in every recent election cycle. Regardless of who is elected POTUS in November, support for Israel will continue. I, for one, support Israel in their current conflicts. Even if I didn't and the majority of American people didn't as well, it wouldn't matter because campaign dollars mean more to our two major parties than the American people do. Fact

Unfortunately, this is true. Sad, but very true. But I think saying "cutting off all aid to Israel" is also not the right way to go....but what BOTH parties need to say to get my vote is this:

We need to hold Israel/Netanyahu accountable for the oppressive atrocities that they too have imposed upon the civilian Palestinians over the last hundred years. We also need to hold Hamas accountable for the atrocities that they too have imposed upon Israel over the last hundred years. All global leaders need to unite to ensure a peaceful transition to a two-member state where Jerusalem is an international city. Period.

Someone needs to have the cojones to say this!

Another person who has never read any history; before Israel was formed, Jews were there on that land for a long, long time. I won't get into it but I am so tired of people who have no clue! acting like it is so simple.

[Anonymous]

Fact checking going on at the bottom of the screen with a ticker on each side... When someone gets to 50 lies they lose 30 seconds for their answers.... When they get to 100 lives, the debate is over and the remaining candidate gets the rest of the time to talk about what they want

[Anonymous]

I don't care about one debate. You cannot pay me enough money in the world to vote for him

[Anonymous]

Imagine how energized his base will be when he starts insulting a black woman.
MAGA is just sick.

[Anonymous]

People need to focus more on the actual substantive issues and less on candidate popularity. With a Harris administration, it is wise to be concerned about how she’d handle foreign policy, the Southern border, and taxation (esp estates and retirement savings). Her voting record in Congress was quite far left leaning. Questions remain unanswered which I’m hoping the debate will help reveal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People need to focus more on the actual substantive issues and less on candidate popularity. With a Harris administration, it is wise to be concerned about how she’d handle foreign policy, the Southern border, and taxation (esp estates and retirement savings). Her voting record in Congress was quite far left leaning. Questions remain unanswered which I’m hoping the debate will help reveal.

Hmm foreign policy-I know Kamala won’t try to blow up our NATO alliances or share classified materials with Putin or Xi. I don’t have enough money to worry about estate taxes-just like 95 pct of Americans. The southern border crossings are down with Biden below Trump levels now. And she’s not an insurrectionist, morally and financial bankrupt sexual predator. So yeah, I’m cool with my “popular” choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People need to focus more on the actual substantive issues and less on candidate popularity. With a Harris administration, it is wise to be concerned about how she’d handle foreign policy, the Southern border, and taxation (esp estates and retirement savings). Her voting record in Congress was quite far left leaning. Questions remain unanswered which I’m hoping the debate will help reveal.

Hmm foreign policy-I know Kamala won’t try to blow up our NATO alliances or share classified materials with Putin or Xi. I don’t have enough money to worry about estate taxes-just like 95 pct of Americans. The southern border crossings are down with Biden below Trump levels now. And she’s not an insurrectionist, morally and financial bankrupt sexual predator. So yeah, I’m cool with my “popular” choice.

+1 for me the substantive issue is prosecutor or felon. I’m not voting for a man who I wouldn’t feel comfortable letting my children near.

[Anonymous]

I hope Kamala mops the floor with T****.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Above all, Kamala needs to commit to cutting off all aid to Israel.

She’s cannot commit to that at the debate. President Biden’s call.

She can commit to doing whatever she wants once she’s inaugurated. If she won’t commit to divestment and an end to aid to Israel, many of us will just stay home on Election Day.

Oh this Russian talking point is back in use? Let’s everyone see it for what it is: an attempt to sow division and it’s such a silly reach here.