The DA thinks Scott is guilty and no DNA testing is necessary
https://www.kron4.com/news/california/scott-peterson-trial/da-says-scott-peterson-is-still-guilty-of-murdering-wife-no-dna-tests-necessary/amp/ This isn’t how our Justice system is supposed to work. If there’s any shadows of reasonable doubt, he shouldn’t even be convicted. Scott was convicted by the media before the trial even began |
I remember those details. Also that there was a string around the baby's neck, suggesting he was born alive and quickly killed. |
![]() A suspicious stolen orange van was torched near Peterson’s home on the morning after his wife went missing, but police never connected it to the murder case, court documents state. Parts of the burned van contained blood and should be tested for DNA, according to LA Innocence Project. Fladager and fellow special prosecutor David Harris filed an opposition motion on May 29 urging the judge to reject all requests from Peterson’s defense team for DNA testing. Unless ordered by the judge, the District Attorney’s Office said it will not hand over evidence from the case. The convicted killer’s newest legal maneuver was “cobbled together,” prosecutors assert in their opposition motion. They wrote, “There is no valid new evidence. The testing for DNA would not raise a reasonability probability of a different outcome and would just subject the victims’ family to grief and hardship. The People ask this court to deny all of the defendant’s requests for DNA testing. Defendant’s resulting theory is based entirely upon conjecture and speculation.” Peterson is seeking to DNA test 17 items: four items associated with the burned orange van found the morning after Laci went missing; 11 items found near or with Laci and Conner’s bodies; and two items from a burglary across the street from his home. If the new evidence is cobbled together and nonsense, why is the DA too scared to let it get DNA tested? |
Cops should not be allowed to lead any homicide investigations whatsoever. Bias inevitably seeps in and they dismiss anything contrary to the suspect they have in mind. That’s what happened with Scott |
They determined the baby had not been in the water more than a few days. How could that have been given that it was still dated to be around 9 months of age. Why was Laci’s body far more decomposed? Where was the baby’s body all that time? |
The umbilical cord and placenta was also not found. Twine around the neck and Meconium in the bowels imply the baby was born but killed immediately after. Also, Connor was full term. It doesn’t fit with Scott killing her on the 24th when she was 7 and 1/2 months pregnant. The bodies of Laci and Connor were found in April 2003, and her due date was Feb 10, 2003. It’s possible she lived for far longer. The marina was a shallow body of water and taking that long from Dec-April to find a body seems unlikely. If she was killed in February after the due date, that makes more sense with the circumstances and physical state of decomposition. |
The Peterson search was extensive almost immediately after her disappearance. The community went into action and helicopters, boats, park rangers literally everything was used. There’s no way she was killed in December and her body couldn’t be found in the water. |
This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha. |
I can’t say I blame Sharon. If you learned your son in law was having an affair and told his mistress his wife is gone, you’d hate him too and think he is a suspect. It’s media firebrands and nutjobs like Nancy Grace (who was once reprimanded as a prosecutor by the state of Georgia for withholding state evidence) and the cops’ fault for not following up on the robbers or any witnesses who said they saw Laci walking the dog. The state’s case claims Laci died at home before 10:00am and she didn’t walk the dog that morning which is contrary to what many of the neighbors said. |
An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair. Scott is where he belongs. |
* Mistress |
Do we think he hired someone to kill her, thus the fishing trip was supposed to be an alibi? But somehow it was goofed and the hired killers turned on him and dumped her body to incriminate him? |
Scott was a lying liar who lies. He had his day in court, and nobody believed his story. |
Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt. This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing |
The police should’ve named Amber as a suspect not an accomplice.
The entire way they went about things was wrong |