Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

[Anonymous]

These items*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

Only 1 item is getting tested. And it has been tested before. Dream big, weirdo!

[Anonymous]

There was never anything concrete tying him to her murder. The media convicted Scott Peterson just like they tried to do with Gary Condit.

[Anonymous]

The city motto of Modesto is water, wealth, contentment, health and residents jokingly nicknamed it “murder, meth, and auto theft” instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi Scott's jailhouse lover,

You need to spend more time trying to get visitation with Scott and less time making up alternate theories on a message board.

It’s got to be that sister in law obsessed with him.

Negative on both counts.

There are tons of websites online that explain the police and prosecutorial misconduct and negligence in this case.

The Innocence Project does deep research into these things and the Scott Peterson innocent webpages have existed for a long time but picked up steam after the A&E documentary which many people felt was pro Scott though I disagree.

I think he’ll be exonerated one day like Adnan Syed. California is very liberal today compared to 2004. They would never count a 7 month old pregnancy as double murder today in the first place. They’re pushing for that to be legal with abortions

Oh, FFS. As if your obsession with this case isn't crazy enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

Only 1 item is getting tested. And it has been tested before. Dream big, weirdo!

lol this is hilarious

[Anonymous]

Scott’s family should have been charged with aiding and abetting. When he was arrested, he had some of their credit cards and his brother’s ID, to help him flee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

What do you have against periods? Every one of your posts is missing punctuations at the end of the last sentence. It's weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home

I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead.

And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.

Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit.

I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest.

I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace.

I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.

You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?

Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott.

After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci.

This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha.

An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair.

Scott is where he belongs.

Do we think he hired someone to kill her, thus the fishing trip was supposed to be an alibi? But somehow it was goofed and the hired killers turned on him and dumped her body to incriminate him?

If you are doing something to have an alibi , you are sure to have witnesses!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

What do you have against periods? Every one of your posts is missing punctuations at the end of the last sentence. It's weird.

Why did you pluralize the word “punctuation?” Clear evidence of a personality disorder! This thread is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

What do you have against periods? Every one of your posts is missing punctuations at the end of the last sentence. It's weird.

Because it’s all copy and pasted garbage from Free Scotty type blogs. Must not select the period before copying. This PP just posts random crap in here constantly as if anyone is reading it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

What do you have against periods? Every one of your posts is missing punctuations at the end of the last sentence. It's weird.

Because it’s all copy and pasted garbage from Free Scotty type blogs. Must not select the period before copying. This PP just posts random crap in here constantly as if anyone is reading it.

Apparently, you and the rest of the mom mob read it rather closely if you notice the lack of periods. Do you grade syntax too?

[Anonymous]

It’s not derailment or off topic or offensive content. When did different opinions become offensive? I thought discussion forums are supposed to be for debate not echoes. You’re upset I didn’t tag along with the rest of the mom mob, known for uprooting men’s rights and lives

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scattershot defense attorney wannabe is back convincing no one.

+1 like low level criminals are going to murder a full-term pregnant woman. Oh and leave no forensic evidence behind despite it being in heat of moment and unplanned. It’s such a dumb argument.

There is tons of forensic evidence but they never were tested and some are in the process of getting tested now. The noose on Connors neck, the tape on Laci and Connor was never tested because it was explained to be debris but how does a noose and tape stick on bodies underwater?

This is the opening LAIP is using to test those pieces and also the blood stained mattress in the burned van on Christmas Day a mile from Scott’s house. The state is fighting the need to test these times.

I’m not sure why. If Scott was 100% guilty and deserved the death penalty, there should be no concern about forensic testing proving something else

What do you have against periods? Every one of your posts is missing punctuations at the end of the last sentence. It's weird.

Because it’s all copy and pasted garbage from Free Scotty type blogs. Must not select the period before copying. This PP just posts random crap in here constantly as if anyone is reading it.

Apparently, you and the rest of the mom mob read it rather closely if you notice the lack of periods. Do you grade syntax too?

Nobody ever engages with it. Has this escaped yoir notice?