Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][img]https://www.kron4.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2024/03/orange-van1.jpg?resize=742,554[/img]

A suspicious stolen orange van was torched near Peterson’s home on the morning after his wife went missing, but police never connected it to the murder case, court documents state. Parts of the burned van contained blood and should be tested for DNA, according to LA Innocence Project.

Fladager and fellow special prosecutor David Harris filed an opposition motion on May 29 urging the judge to reject all requests from Peterson’s defense team for DNA testing. Unless ordered by the judge, the District Attorney’s Office said it will not hand over evidence from the case.

The convicted killer’s newest legal maneuver was “cobbled together,” prosecutors assert in their opposition motion. They wrote, “There is no valid new evidence. The testing for DNA would not raise a reasonability probability of a different outcome and would just subject the victims’ family to grief and hardship. The People ask this court to deny all of the defendant’s requests for DNA testing. Defendant’s resulting theory is based entirely upon conjecture and speculation.”

Peterson is seeking to DNA test 17 items: four items associated with the burned orange van found the morning after Laci went missing; 11 items found near or with Laci and Conner’s bodies; and two items from a burglary across the street from his home.

If the new evidence is cobbled together and nonsense, why is the DA too scared to let it get DNA tested?

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics