Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sorry for your loss. I can see why you are upset that she asked but in the interest of family harmony, there must be at least one piece that you do not care for that you can give to your SIL.
My MIL has a ton of jewelry and I fully expect it all to go to my SIL. I do not plan to ask for anything. My dd would likely ask for a piece. She really doesn’t wear jewelry but would want something to remember her grandma. I’m sure your sil is asking for the same reason and not to encroach on your inheritance.
I'm the one defending OP here - and I think it's also different if the niece (or nephew!) asks OP for a piece of jewelry. I think it's different if the brother asks.
SIL should not be asking. It's not her mother.
What? The niece is further removed than a DIL? Most nieces and nephews aren’t around their aunt and uncles as much into adulthood. However a DIL a lot of times contributes to her elder care or at least helps support her husband in the care of his mother.
OP's niece is the mother's grandkid. Of course a grandkid can ask. And the brother - OP's sibling, the mother's child - can of course ask, too.
We don't know all the context. If the DIL is asking for a piece of costume jewelry OP doesn't care about because it has sentimental value, that's one thing. From how OP wrote her post, that;s not how it sounds. SIL shouldn't have a windfall, or ask for a windfall, while OP is grieving like this.
I agree that SIL should have waited until a better time to ask when the grief wasn’t so raw. Absolutely! However from what the OP wrote the SIL and her MIL were close as well. Not to compare the grief one has for their own parent vs a MIL but I’m sure that the SIL is grieving in her own way as well.
I disagree that it’s as cut and dry as you make it sound that you have to be a blood relative to ask. It should depend on closeness not blood. And from what OP herself wrote the SIL was very much close to her MIL and has been around for 20 years. That’s hardly an insignificant relationship. You’re right that if SIL was asking for a bunch of jewelry or the most expensive piece that would be uncalled for but to ask for one piece which is what OP herself wrote isn’t crazy for a family you been a part of for 20 years.
OP says her brother insists that SIL and MIL were close - but I don't know if that's true. And honestly if they were that close, MIL would have said something to OP about sharing with the SIL - or would have put something in the will. Or would have told the SIL and the brother and OP that she wanted SIL to have something and to work it out with OP.
My mother, who I hope to gd will never die, has told me that her jewelry is for me - but I should let my SIL have one piece. I'm sure it'll be more than that. But the point is we've had a conversation about it. And I can't IMAGINE me SIL would ever ASK - if anyone ever feels entitled enough to ask, it should be the blood relative.
I just cannot imagine someone doing this while the daughter is grieving. It speaks to why OP and her SIL don't have the kind of relationship where of course OP would have offered her something, I think.
Since I am the only one defending OP, maybe I am missing something here. But honestly, to me it sounds like a bunch of nasty DILs who probably complain nonstop about their terrible in laws, feeling entitled to their stuff once they're gone. That's a bad look. I truly cannot imagine doing this with my in laws - they have two sons, and a granddaughter, and
I assume it's all going to the granddaughter. If my MIL tells me and my husband she wants me to have something of hers, that would be a lovely (and unnecessary) gesture. I'm not blood.