The Queen Consort

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hate her.

Diana should be queen

Yup. Camilla doesn't deserve this. She's no Queen Consort to me. She continued to pursue Charles while he was with Diana. He should have stuck it out with the mother of his children for the sake of the crown and Diana would have been exiting that vehicle today. So sad.

I just don’t understand this perspective. Neither Charles nor Diana were in love with each other by the end of their marriage, and they both were miserable and having affairs. So they should have just kept making each other miserable and having affairs because that would be better for the crown? I get it, people loved Diana, but this is advice you would give to no one you care about.

He never should have married Diana. And when he did he should have stayed faithful. Diana would have lived him til the end.

And not like Camilla has nothing to do with liking Diana. I don’t know anyone who likes the other woman,

So he should have been forced to endure a loveless, basically arranged marriage till the end despite the fact that affairs are commonplace among that lot. And she as well. Sounds great!

Yes, for the sake of the crown dear. The Queen would have

The Queen did. Phillip cheated on her many times.

Right. You know the crown is fiction right? There’s no proof, only rumors from internet “experts” who were born when Phillip was already an old man

Never watched the crown

[Anonymous]

https://www.privateloveaffair.com/viral/did-prince-philip-have-an-affair/#:~:text=Did%20Prince%20Philip%20Have%20an%20Affair%3F%201%20The,Penny%20Brabourne.%20...%204%20Other%20Alleged%20Affairs.%20

[Anonymous]

I was about five when Charles and Diana married and in college when she died. I was always confused by the love for her.
Obviously the Camilla stuff was humiliating because it was so public but faithful love marriages are exceptionally rare among royal couples.
Anyone who thinks that Diana would have “loved Charles forever” is an utter moron. She didn’t love him and wasn’t expected to.
Frankly, the royal family made a terrible choice with her. She was unfit for such a public role. Aside from being able to birth an heir, the most important thing should be thick skin. The woman couldn’t even hold her head up, for heavens sake. I don’t know what the royal family was thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was about five when Charles and Diana married and in college when she died. I was always confused by the love for her.
Obviously the Camilla stuff was humiliating because it was so public but faithful love marriages are exceptionally rare among royal couples.
Anyone who thinks that Diana would have “loved Charles forever” is an utter moron. She didn’t love him and wasn’t expected to.
Frankly, the royal family made a terrible choice with her. She was unfit for such a public role. Aside from being able to birth an heir, the most important thing should be thick skin. The woman couldn’t even hold her head up, for heavens sake. I don’t know what the royal family was thinking.

Agreed
The royal family went by the rule get-them-young, treat-them-rough, tell-them-nothing

Except she blossomed into a lovely lady and out shined her husband

And the princes love her dearly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was about five when Charles and Diana married and in college when she died. I was always confused by the love for her.
Obviously the Camilla stuff was humiliating because it was so public but faithful love marriages are exceptionally rare among royal couples.
Anyone who thinks that Diana would have “loved Charles forever” is an utter moron. She didn’t love him and wasn’t expected to.
Frankly, the royal family made a terrible choice with her. She was unfit for such a public role. Aside from being able to birth an heir, the most important thing should be thick skin. The woman couldn’t even hold her head up, for heavens sake. I don’t know what the royal family was thinking.

But that’s kind of what’s so detestable to me. If Charles wanted someone who would silently accept his affairs step one is don’t marry a 19 year old virgin. Like he really could’ve married someone that got to experience the world the way that he had or at least someone with a fully matured brain but just felt entitled to sow his wild oats into his thirties and then marry someone who is too young to have done the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hate her.

Diana should be queen

She has been dead for 25 years! At least Charles had only one extramarital affair and is now married to her. Diana, on the other hand, had several lovers while married. She was not a saint nor is Charles.

In her 17 year marriage to Charles, Camilla has been a huge asset. I wish both of them a long, happy, successful reign. Long live the King and the Queen consort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.privateloveaffair.com/viral/did-prince-philip-have-an-affair/#:~:text=Did%20Prince%20Philip%20Have%20an%20Affair%3F%201%20The,Penny%20Brabourne.%20...%204%20Other%20Alleged%20Affairs.%20

Didn’t William have one also?

No. He dealt with infidelity of his parents so not going to subject his wife and kids to same trauma. It helps that he married his best friend and college sweetheart, wasn't forced into a suitable arrangement while in love with someone else. Charles already loved someone, wasn't compatible with a much younger unhappy girl who only married him for his status. That's what it seems, we aren't privy to details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.privateloveaffair.com/viral/did-prince-philip-have-an-affair/#:~:text=Did%20Prince%20Philip%20Have%20an%20Affair%3F%201%20The,Penny%20Brabourne.%20...%204%20Other%20Alleged%20Affairs.%20

Didn’t William have one also?

Nope nice try Meghan stan. Sorry your thread blew up and got locked but stick to the topic at hand.

Yes, Peggington is the only royal to never cheat and he’s really living in Adelaide cottage because they thought that given the fact that the UK can’t afford a bank holiday for the Queen’s death it would be a great time to get a fourth house just cause.

The funny thing is they were just arguing up thread that it’s common for a King to have affairs. So which is it?

I guess lots of women try to trap princes and kings, some fall for it and others control their urges.

[Anonymous]

Idk which clueless person thought of Charles and Diana as a good match?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.privateloveaffair.com/viral/did-prince-philip-have-an-affair/#:~:text=Did%20Prince%20Philip%20Have%20an%20Affair%3F%201%20The,Penny%20Brabourne.%20...%204%20Other%20Alleged%20Affairs.%20

Didn’t William have one also?

Yes. He did.

He’s like Charles in more ways than one.

[Anonymous]

Diana knew about Camilla from Day 1. Charles and Camilla had been together on and off for over ten years at that point. Camilla was at their wedding. It was not a wedding of love, it was basically an arranged marriage as they wanted Charles to have a wife and children to carry on the line of succession and single King's are not really wanted. Diana may have had affairs before James Hewitt. I dobt think Charles and Diana were ever madly in love or committed to each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.privateloveaffair.com/viral/did-prince-philip-have-an-affair/#:~:text=Did%20Prince%20Philip%20Have%20an%20Affair%3F%201%20The,Penny%20Brabourne.%20...%204%20Other%20Alleged%20Affairs.%20

Didn’t William have one also?

Yes. He did.

He’s like Charles in more ways than one.

There is no evidence William had an affair, just tabloid and rumormill gossip

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was about five when Charles and Diana married and in college when she died. I was always confused by the love for her.
Obviously the Camilla stuff was humiliating because it was so public but faithful love marriages are exceptionally rare among royal couples.
Anyone who thinks that Diana would have “loved Charles forever” is an utter moron. She didn’t love him and wasn’t expected to.
Frankly, the royal family made a terrible choice with her. She was unfit for such a public role. Aside from being able to birth an heir, the most important thing should be thick skin. The woman couldn’t even hold her head up, for heavens sake. I don’t know what the royal family was thinking.

But that’s kind of what’s so detestable to me. If Charles wanted someone who would silently accept his affairs step one is don’t marry a 19 year old virgin. Like he really could’ve married someone that got to experience the world the way that he had or at least someone with a fully matured brain but just felt entitled to sow his wild oats into his thirties and then marry someone who is too young to have done the same.

Blame the queen for this, because she was the one who required that he marry a virgin.

The Queen was a bad queen and a bad mother. I never will understand why people admire this woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was about five when Charles and Diana married and in college when she died. I was always confused by the love for her.
Obviously the Camilla stuff was humiliating because it was so public but faithful love marriages are exceptionally rare among royal couples.
Anyone who thinks that Diana would have “loved Charles forever” is an utter moron. She didn’t love him and wasn’t expected to.
Frankly, the royal family made a terrible choice with her. She was unfit for such a public role. Aside from being able to birth an heir, the most important thing should be thick skin. The woman couldn’t even hold her head up, for heavens sake. I don’t know what the royal family was thinking.

But that’s kind of what’s so detestable to me. If Charles wanted someone who would silently accept his affairs step one is don’t marry a 19 year old virgin. Like he really could’ve married someone that got to experience the world the way that he had or at least someone with a fully matured brain but just felt entitled to sow his wild oats into his thirties and then marry someone who is too young to have done the same.

Blame the queen for this, because she was the one who required that he marry a virgin.

The Queen was a bad queen and a bad mother. I never will understand why people admire this woman.

You’re applying modern standards and not considering the unique circumstances of her upbringing.

[Anonymous]

Camilla and their relationship are the only redeeming qualities of Charles. I grew up reading about the various scandals, but the pictures of them now they look genuinely happy. Reminds me that life is long and love is complicated.

That said, modern monarchy just doesn’t sit right with me. But, as an American Londoner, I find myself softening to the concept as it does provide an anchor to the country. Especially given Liz Truss is such a weak PM.