| You lost me at “their behavior communicates what they experience at home.” If it’s clear to the parents that you are judging them, then of course they aren’t listening to you. |
My personal favorite was: - Teacher: Your child has big problems and terrible behavior! - Me: That’s odd - we’ve never heard that after years in daycare - Teacher: (No mention of Child Find evaluations) Your child is horrible!! - Me: Well, what can we do right now? - Teacher: Nothing. Until we know what is causing this, there is nothing I can do. - Me: … ok, guess we will leave this school - Child: (Next two years, perfect behavior in different school.) |
DP. These dialogues *actually happen.* Regularly. So regularly every SN mom recognizes them. Here’s another one: Me: Hi, teacher - My child has autism and here are XYZ things to do when you see ABC behavior. It’s in the IEP Teacher: OMG CHILD DID ABC!!!! Me: Did you follow the IEP? Teacher: …. Most teachers are well meaning. But many have a lot to learn when it comes to establishing good partnerships with parents of kids having challenges. |
You should have your teaching license revoked. Severe constipation and ASD are in no way similar and are both medical issues that need medical treatment. You need to stay in your lane and stop playing doctor. |
I am the teacher who posted above AND a special needs mom. I have been on BOTH sides of the desk during parent / teacher conferences and I have had tough conversations about my own kid. That doesn’t mean I’m going to gleefully mock an entire profession because I had a bad experience. (I did.) That’s what this portion of the thread is… mocking. I teach my students and my own children not to stand for that. |
Well then I apologize. I was only speaking from our experience where we get little information on what is happening and then get determinations cloaked in whatever psuedo-clinical terminology is trendy at the moment. Hopefully you don't do either of those things. The lack of information due to Hippa or whatever makes us unable to comprehend the scope of the problem and the psuedo-clinical terminology often used in describing things minimizes the serious of the situation. Please for God's sake use nornal language and let us know the individuals involved. We often have cont3xt that is useful on figuring out what the problem is. |
We can certainly use normal language and we should be doing that. As for naming other students, I can get in significant trouble for doing so. A coworker of mine was formally reprimanded for using another student’s name during a parent/teacher conference. |
OP started the thread criticizing parents, so here we are. And recounting common conversations and dynamics is not “mocking” you. |
But are they actually “common conversations”? Do you think these reflect regular interactions? I highly doubt that’s true. As I wrote, I’m a parent of a SN child and I have had the types of conversations the OP mentioned in relation to my OWN kid. I did not read the OP’s post as mocking at all. Rather, it was a sincere (if poorly worded) appeal to parents to listen to teachers’ comments. It did not warrant the out-for-blood responses from some parents here. It has been a long year for all of us and it would be nice if we could pause the attacks and give a bit of grace. I know that’s a big ask for DCUM. |
Parenting is a verb |
PP here and again, your attitude here is abrasive and superior. Parents are responding to your attitude and tone. The words you used in your OP were not "blunt", they were wrong. You are wrong that Kids who are being picked on simply need to "learn not to be a victim." You are wrong that you are capable of diagnosing a child with autism. Even if one of your kids has autism! I know from experience that often parents of kids with SN can be most guilty of hearing hoofbeats and thinking zebras. Your experience with your own kid can make it hard to view other children objectively, and unless you are evaluating the child in more than one settings, you are not getting a full enough picture to make a diagnosis (not to mention that being a parent of a kid with SN does not actually make you a doctor, we all need to remember that). But my bigger issue here is that even when parents are politely and fairly pointing out how your OP was worded in a combative, hurtful way that put parents on the defensive, your response is sarcastic, angry, and rude. If you want parents to approach you as a trusted partner, act like one. You are basically saying "listen to what I say but DON'T try to give me context that might alter my point of view because I'm right and you're wrong, and I'm the teacher so I know best." Sorry, but if that is your approach, it's no wonder you encounter parents who don't trust your assessment or who push back with alternate views. Maybe some of those kids who you diagnosed with autism really were just smart loners, and you could have better supported them if you hadn't been busy indicting their parents. Maybe some of those kids you decided were "acting the victim" were actually doing everything they could to lay low and protect themselves, and you were simply blaming them for a classroom dynamic they couldn't control. I am so glad my kid's teachers are not like this. |
|
My experience with trusting teachers and the administration about my child was that it meant DC missed out on two years of appropriate reading instruction. Those two years are also some of the most impactful with regard to reading. Apparently DC was put on a watch list in kindergarten, this was not revealed to us until mid-second grade when we were having our first IEP meeting. The secrecy involved in that and the amount of pushback we received that initial year and in subsequent years destroyed any trust I had in the teachers and administrators. “The gift of time” is most detrimental to the students that are in need of the most help.
|
Can you elaborate on what this "watchlist" is? |
I mean, they’re probably just as common as a parent refusing to listen to a teacher. OP’s post was not sincere. It was bashing parents (aka mothers) and acting like she knows better. |
Then there is your problem. Demanding blind faith is never going to work. Especially when using coded language. Here's another problem. Teachers don't even know the questions, answers, or relativity of the computerized tests they use to make the academic assessments. |