Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s good for society that liberal women abort. Christian’s and Muslims inherit the earth

Christian women give birth to liberals every day.

Not the aborting kind.

You have a lot to learn about abortion. Most women that get an abortion are already mothers.

That they have fewer kids is good for the future of the world.

All western cultures are having fewer kids.
Which I agree is good for the future of the planet.

Why would you want the majority of kids born in cultures that don’t care about global warming or environmental health? How is that going to help?

Help has nothing to do with it anymore. The global warming ship has sailed. Human populations in the earth are now just going to adjust to the new climate. It will be ugly.

Warming is good. It will increase the human population, make the earth more green and productive. It’s cooling that kills.

Floods and droughts are the largest killers from climate change.

Yes, that's a very new phenomenon. We didn't have those before the history of you. Everything just kinda started when you noticed it.

Climate change is here and is and will be highly disruptive. You can accept or or deny it and it will make no difference at all. It is here. You can argue it is a good thing or a bad thing and it will make no difference. It is here. Rich people affected will have options and the poor affected are screwed over.

[Anonymous]

Where the b—- at that accused me of not swaying these tender Republican ladies to our side?
Girl where you at?
The discussion has moved on to global warming is grrrrreat! 👍
Come on with your welcoming ways and win over these completely persuadable, well educated, and rational voters!
LFG!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

It’s not risk, it’s the underlying message about what the party thinks of women. Do I think I am personally likely to be raped in prison? Of course not.

Do I want to vote for a party that firmly believes the most vulnerable women should be offered up as emotional support animals for men convicted of rape and sexual assault because the emotions of those men matter more than the safety of the women they attack? No, I don’t. I understand what that says about how that party values all women, and I reject it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

It’s not risk, it’s the underlying message about what the party thinks of women. Do I think I am personally likely to be raped in prison? Of course not.

Do I want to vote for a party that firmly believes the most vulnerable women should be offered up as emotional support animals for men convicted of rape and sexual assault because the emotions of those men matter more than the safety of the women they attack? No, I don’t. I understand what that says about how that party values all women, and I reject it.

So what is the GOP’s message about what it thinks about women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

It’s not risk, it’s the underlying message about what the party thinks of women. Do I think I am personally likely to be raped in prison? Of course not.

Do I want to vote for a party that firmly believes the most vulnerable women should be offered up as emotional support animals for men convicted of rape and sexual assault because the emotions of those men matter more than the safety of the women they attack? No, I don’t. I understand what that says about how that party values all women, and I reject it.

So what is the GOP’s message about what it thinks about women?

It stinks that women can vote.

[Anonymous]

👆that
And you have to choose between the two and the Republican stance is clearly the worst position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I definitely understood Bush-era Republicans but I just cannot wrap my mind around how any remotely educated woman today could consider herself a part of the Republican party. Can someone please explain it to me? What is appealing about the Republican party?

Most educated European, Asian, African, Lat Am women vote for what you deem are Republican policies and candidates. So not a big surprise why some educated women would do the same here.

Maybe someone can examine YOUR brain to see what's wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I definitely understood Bush-era Republicans but I just cannot wrap my mind around how any remotely educated woman today could consider herself a part of the Republican party. Can someone please explain it to me? What is appealing about the Republican party?

Most educated European, Asian, African, Lat Am women vote for what you deem are Republican policies and candidates. So not a big surprise why some educated women would do the same here.

Maybe someone can examine YOUR brain to see what's wrong?

Citation needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I definitely understood Bush-era Republicans but I just cannot wrap my mind around how any remotely educated woman today could consider herself a part of the Republican party. Can someone please explain it to me? What is appealing about the Republican party?

Most educated European, Asian, African, Lat Am women vote for what you deem are Republican policies and candidates. So not a big surprise why some educated women would do the same here.

Maybe someone can examine YOUR brain to see what's wrong?

What are the GOP policies that you are voting for? It’s a simple enough question.

[Anonymous]

Pro national security, controlling illegal immigration, smart military spending, limited federal government, pro property rights, protect right to gun ownership, recognize sex based rights including for sports, abortion determined at the state level by the people not unelected judges, recognize freedom of speech and religion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where the b—- at that accused me of not swaying these tender Republican ladies to our side?
Girl where you at?
The discussion has moved on to global warming is grrrrreat! 👍
Come on with your welcoming ways and win over these completely persuadable, well educated, and rational voters!
LFG!!!!!

Stop with the drugs. It’s frying your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:👆that
And you have to choose between the two and the Republican stance is clearly the worst position.

I don’t have to choose. I can simply not vote. Since both parties hate women, I will opt out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

It’s not risk, it’s the underlying message about what the party thinks of women. Do I think I am personally likely to be raped in prison? Of course not.

Do I want to vote for a party that firmly believes the most vulnerable women should be offered up as emotional support animals for men convicted of rape and sexual assault because the emotions of those men matter more than the safety of the women they attack? No, I don’t. I understand what that says about how that party values all women, and I reject it.

So what is the GOP’s message about what it thinks about women?

They hate women too. That doesn’t mean the Democrats get my money or vote. “Vote for the party that despises you a little less but still considers you an un-person” is not compelling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

You’re a disgusting bottom feeder to suggest that it’s all right to cede safety in girls sports and the safety of female prisoners because a nasty subgroup of men demand it. You’re also a complete idiot not to see how evil and hateful democrats are to force women to accept male fetishists in female spaces, sports and medicine in return for abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

It’s not risk, it’s the underlying message about what the party thinks of women. Do I think I am personally likely to be raped in prison? Of course not.

Do I want to vote for a party that firmly believes the most vulnerable women should be offered up as emotional support animals for men convicted of rape and sexual assault because the emotions of those men matter more than the safety of the women they attack? No, I don’t. I understand what that says about how that party values all women, and I reject it.

Exactly. I enthusiastically and completely reject the idea that the next frontier of progress is for the sexual thrills of transvestites to be elevated above women’s safety. I will never support the remaking of society, complete with forced speech and teaching lies to kids, all to accommodate disturbed buffoons in wigs. My womanhood isn’t up for grabs by some confused boy or an adult male predator. This is a men’s rights movement and any woman who supports it is a traitor, coward, and liar.

+1000. I may not be likely to be raped in prison but my kids school in MD is literally telling students that they can choose to be a boy or a girl. When everyone knows this is false. Everyone.

For what? We all know why. So a few mentally individuals ill can affirm their dysphoric delusions or get off on colonizing women’s spaces and the medical industrial complex can rake in revenues by creating surgically altered pharmacological dependent patients for life.