Don't fly United

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'll never fly united.


Me too. They suck. I don't trust them. The whole crew were so rude when we flew with them 2 years ago. I'm a frequent flyer. Never again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'll never fly united.


Me too. They suck. I don't trust them. The whole crew were so rude when we flew with them 2 years ago. I'm a frequent flyer. Never again.

Same here. Never again.
Anonymous
I only fly once or twice a year. Always Southwest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just read a Reuters story with this sentence: "Dao's wife was told to leave the plane after he was dragged off, Golan said."


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fus-ual-passenger-idUSKBN17F1WT#pt0-864975

Who would think this could ever happen in the United States of America?


What, cops beating someone up to protect a huge company?!?


Are you new to the country?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just read a Reuters story with this sentence: "Dao's wife was told to leave the plane after he was dragged off, Golan said."


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fus-ual-passenger-idUSKBN17F1WT#pt0-864975

Who would think this could ever happen in the United States of America?


What, cops beating someone up to protect a huge company?!?


Are you new to the country?

Well, at least two of the thugs got suspended.
Who will hire them now?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just read a Reuters story with this sentence: "Dao's wife was told to leave the plane after he was dragged off, Golan said."


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fus-ual-passenger-idUSKBN17F1WT#pt0-864975

Who would think this could ever happen in the United States of America?


What, cops beating someone up to protect a huge company?!?


Are you new to the country?

Well, at least two of the thugs got suspended.
Who will hire them now?


by thugs, you mean the police officers? What about the gate agents. It is against the company policy to allow commuters (who must fly stand-by) to bump paying customers.
Still not clear what the employees' status was, but commuters commute at their own risk (supposedly).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The states and local jurisdictions need to stop letting the cops be used to further United corporate interests. This is a waste of tax payer money and takes the police away from doing more important work. If there is a safety or a security issue - then its appropriate for the local police to become involved but removing a passenger because United employees want a free seat? Even if it had been over booked, United needs to compensate the paying passengers that didn't get on or raise the incentives for volunteers not use the CPD as its personal bouncers to save money.


+ a million. That right there is what is so galling about this case. United used the cops to protect their money.


And I'm going to guess that when all the facts come out we'll learn that United staff likely characterized Mr Dao as belligerent and unruly to the aviation cops as a means to get them onto the plane to do United's dirty work. I'm sure United did NOT characterize the situation accurately (that a paying customer needed to be bumped to accommodate staff). United clearly did so much wrong here but I think there are still lots of unsavory things to be revealed. I read that the CEO said United would be reimbursing everyone on that flight the cost of their tickets. I sure hope for their sake they aren't trying to attach any conditions to that (ticket reimbursement in exchange for keeping your mouth shut). But somehow, I don't put t past United to be just that dumb.
Anonymous
As for other savory details I think the impending court case will be interesting because it will also hopefully reveal how the four bumping victims were selected. My gut sense is that his age and race factors into it. They thought he'd be meek and obliging. Another minutia question I have is whether their bags were checked and already in the haul of the plane. They were seated and ready to take off so I have to assume yes. Dr Dao and his wife had been on vaca in California. I find it hard to believe they just had carry ons. So on top of everything else the airline was willing to likely have their paying customers lose their luggage. In their calculation of who should be bumped why wouldn't someone with just a carry-on and just traveling from Chicago to Louisville be the obvious victim. I think we can safely Assume no one is getting bumped on any airline right about now unless they pay and a enormous amount
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The states and local jurisdictions need to stop letting the cops be used to further United corporate interests. This is a waste of tax payer money and takes the police away from doing more important work. If there is a safety or a security issue - then its appropriate for the local police to become involved but removing a passenger because United employees want a free seat? Even if it had been over booked, United needs to compensate the paying passengers that didn't get on or raise the incentives for volunteers not use the CPD as its personal bouncers to save money.


+ a million. That right there is what is so galling about this case. United used the cops to protect their money.


And I'm going to guess that when all the facts come out we'll learn that United staff likely characterized Mr Dao as belligerent and unruly to the aviation cops as a means to get them onto the plane to do United's dirty work. I'm sure United did NOT characterize the situation accurately (that a paying customer needed to be bumped to accommodate staff). United clearly did so much wrong here but I think there are still lots of unsavory things to be revealed. I read that the CEO said United would be reimbursing everyone on that flight the cost of their tickets. I sure hope for their sake they aren't trying to attach any conditions to that (ticket reimbursement in exchange for keeping your mouth shut). But somehow, I don't put t past United to be just that dumb.


Yes, that's likely why the lawyers asked to preserve all communications, so they can find out how the gate agents presented the sutuation. I will note this though - after he was dragged unconscious from the plane, clearly the security guys did not retain control over him because when he came to, in his dazed and confused state he ran back on the plane. Had they thought he was a security risk and a threat, one would assume they'd lock him down. I think they didn't keep control of him because they had what they wanted, his empty seat. They knew he wasn't a threat, they just wanted his seat. The whole thing is disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:United CEO already admitted it was NOT overbooked. They had 4 employees that were commuting (on personal passes) to Louisville to work and the ground crew decided that they took priority over a paying passenger. They also showed up at the last minute which is why everyone was boarded - hence, why it was NOT overbooked. If it truly was overbooked, those employees would have been confirmed on that flight (when you commute on personal passes, it is always space available). So- the ground crew protected their on a flight that was not overbooked to accommodate space available employees commuting to work (on personal passes since they didn't live in Louisville as they should have when they were assigned there).

It is all just so wrong on so many levels-the CEO's 1st insulting non-statement.. the email he sent to the employees afterwards saying he was behind them on pulling out this disruptive customer.

Love how Jimmy Kimmel did a United commercial reflecting their attitude- this is the best:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV28_ENzFog




Were they in Chicago for personal reasons and not for work? Just wondering -- it would add another terrible layer to this story.


Not sure if this is true, but supposedly they were assigned to work in Louisville, but live in Chicago because they prefer it, and basically "commute" to Louisville for work. I've seen this as conjecture, do not know if it is true.


This is true- the employees didn't want to move to Louisville so they stayed in Chicago and flew on personal passes to commute. Personal space-available is NEVER above paying passengers- it is purely space available. So- yes the ground crew got nasty thinking they could get a way with this and that everyone would just oblige - to take care of their buddies. This type of "commuting" on personal passes/stand-by is rampant throughout the airline industry. Flight attendants and pilots are like the mafia of the flying discretion- so glad this story will hopefully put a dent in this horrible practice. I worked for a major airline (not flight attendant) and it was horrible trying to fly anywhere due to this commuting mafia situation- they all logged in exactly when they could and it was a list of 8-10 flight attendants. They all knew the ground staff who also let them check in early, etc. It's wrong. Now- kicking off any paying passenger for a personal commute is extremely wrong.

I remember flying with a friend on personal (both employees, not flight attendants though in this industry everyone assumes a female is a flight attendant). The flight attendants were so nasty and mean! As employees traveling, you lay low- you don't demand anything, complain, just lay low. I remember after we sat down (coach), we were talking and a flight attendant came up and whispered- I am SO sorry, I didn't know you were employees! (by how we are booked it shows employees- not what position we had). She gave us a bag full of little bottles of liquor and wine. Really?? So- if we were paying customers, just get the f*** out of the way. Oh- one of us? so sorry, didn't mean for us to mishandle YOU. It really stuck.


So telling.! Nasty attitude and all. Thank you for sharing this. I'm glad you see through the treachery of it all.
We are choosing to drive to places where we otherwise would have flown.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just read a Reuters story with this sentence: "Dao's wife was told to leave the plane after he was dragged off, Golan said."


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fus-ual-passenger-idUSKBN17F1WT#pt0-864975

Who would think this could ever happen in the United States of America?


What, cops beating someone up to protect a huge company?!?


Are you new to the country?

Well, at least two of the thugs got suspended.
Who will hire them now?


by thugs, you mean the police officers? What about the gate agents. It is against the company policy to allow commuters (who must fly stand-by) to bump paying customers.
Still not clear what the employees' status was, but commuters commute at their own risk (supposedly).


Correct. And I think they have to allow two flights each time in case they don't make the first one. Maybe this was a special case where they were called last minute, but that is United's problem and not paying customers. Like it has been said over and over, offering more and more cash to make it worth someone's time to get the next flight was the right thing to do.

Anonymous
Apparently airline lobbyists are already fighting to keep their egregious overbooking practices.

The hell with that. We'll fight for fair treatment and protections for what we have bought and paid for.

I don't think most of us realized how easily we can be victimized by an airline. I love to travel, but these revelations have put a sharp pit in my stomach. I'd rather take a train or drive. Flying used to be pleasant. Now it's an ordeal and a potential crime scene at the hands of greedy corporate executives.
Anonymous
I've volunteered to give up my seat on SW after hearing the agents say the flight was overbooked. They have be a $400 voucher over top of refunding my fare. The good thing about this, my flight left the same day, just 3 hours later.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The states and local jurisdictions need to stop letting the cops be used to further United corporate interests. This is a waste of tax payer money and takes the police away from doing more important work. If there is a safety or a security issue - then its appropriate for the local police to become involved but removing a passenger because United employees want a free seat? Even if it had been over booked, United needs to compensate the paying passengers that didn't get on or raise the incentives for volunteers not use the CPD as its personal bouncers to save money.


+ a million. That right there is what is so galling about this case. United used the cops to protect their money.


And I'm going to guess that when all the facts come out we'll learn that United staff likely characterized Mr Dao as belligerent and unruly to the aviation cops as a means to get them onto the plane to do United's dirty work. I'm sure United did NOT characterize the situation accurately (that a paying customer needed to be bumped to accommodate staff). United clearly did so much wrong here but I think there are still lots of unsavory things to be revealed. I read that the CEO said United would be reimbursing everyone on that flight the cost of their tickets. I sure hope for their sake they aren't trying to attach any conditions to that (ticket reimbursement in exchange for keeping your mouth shut). But somehow, I don't put t past United to be just that dumb.


+1

Totally agree United has shown itself to be ill run, ill advised, currupt, inconsistent and incompetent - on top of what Dao will rightfully bring in his suit.against. It is very obvious United made a false report to get the cops to show up, no doubt. I hope that is included in the case. I suspect more than one phone call was made, to further fabricate and add to the subterfuge. Police departments are wising up to this transparent (and illegal) tactic.
Anonymous
Why would anyone want to fly United after all this unbelievable crap?
post reply Forum Index » Travel Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: