I would listen to your mom on this one. I am assuming that the circumstances surrounding her wedding were not the same as what you are facing now? I agree with others who have suggested that perhaps a destination wedding is not a good idea given the family dynamics you have right now. A wedding in general is tough in this situation but a wedding and a vacation with two freshly-divorced people (parents or not) is a recipe for disaster. Just do something small in the local area and have yourself a hell of a honeymoon. If your mom can handle it, let your dad bring the OW and keep the celebration short. |
|
I want to point out this is a year away....Things are still very raw right now for your Mom and You, but in a year you are both going to be in a very different place.
|
Sounds like your mom is, painfully, taking the high road. Follow her lead and hope that by next spring things are a bit more copacetic. Keep in mind that the wedding is about the bride, you are just an accessory! Tell both your parents that the wedding is all about the bride and that it's her day and nothing can be allowed to disrupt it. |
+1 your wedding, your rules. I think your dad is being unreasonable. If they had been divorced for a longer period of time then the scale would slowly shift to your dad being right. But that scale has not yet begun to shift. |
+1 Personally, if things were this much of a mess, I wouldn't be planning on a small, destination wedding. I'd probably adjust my plans so that the happiness of my wedding day did not depend on the actions and emotions of three other people, none of whom I had any control over. |
+1 No way would I plan an intimate destination wedding with my newly divorced parents. That's just asking for drama. Plan an event that works with the family you have, not the family you wish you had. |
|
I have been through this. My parents were married for over 25 years and he left my mom for another woman. When all was said and done I did not recognize the person he became. He told so many lies and I had absolutely no respect for him. I still loved him but that was about it. My siblings and I decided early on to take a hard line where the mistress was concerned. Not only was she not allowed at family weddings but she was banned from ALL family functions. To this day she has never even met the grandkids. No one wanted to be around his mistress and I would never ever expect my dear mom to be in the same room with her.
Dad raised all kinds of hell and made threats about not showing up. He made good on that threat early on but we held our ground. When he realized this was a permanent situation he finally stopped asking to bring his mistress around. I've heard the mistress gives dad hell every time he goes to a family function without her and they even broke up a couple of times over it. Oh well its not our problem. |
I have to agree with this. It's much easier to ask your dad to come to a local event for a few hours without his girlfriend, than it is to ask him to fly to some resort destination without her. Making it a destination event adds another layer of complexity. |
| I haven't read all the responses, but fwiw I didn't have my dad at my wedding, my grandmother boycotts for that reason, and I am not sorry about it. All the people telling you to have ushers assigned to watch them and wear them far apart and whatnot - yeah, you can do that, but this is hopefully your only wedding. It is a special day and also a stressful one, and I am strongly in the camp of only having people who are there to help you celebrate the way you want To. You don't need this drama on your special day. And these situations will come up again and again. Showing your dad you mean business will serve you in good stead. Good luck and congratulations! |
|
So let me get this straight: Inviting the dad who cheated on the mom, if he comes by himself, to the wedding is fine--as long as he doesn't bring the woman he cheated on the mom with. Even though at this point the mom and dad are legally divorced.
What I don't really get is, if the affair partner of the dad is persona non grata, and not wanted as a wedding guest, then the dad with or without his affair partner, should also be persona non grata, since it was he who cheated on the mom, and it was he who involved the affair partner in the first place. So this is where the logic completely fails. It seems to me, if as a matter of principle or feelings or whatever, you are going to bar the affair partner from the wedding, then you also have to bar the father who cheated, without regard to whether or not his affair partner is in attendance. If on the other hand you say "But he's my father so I HAVE to invite him," all well and good, but then I think you lose any moral authority to bar the affair partner from the wedding assuming everyone is invited with a +1. The parents are after all DIVORCED at this time. She is no longer the affair partner, she is the former affair partner/current significant other. The whole point of getting divorced is that it is the legal cessation of the marital relationship. They are no longer married. They need to put it behind them, and that would include acknowledging that each of the divorced partners is entitled to have a relationship with whoever suits them. Focusing the anger and the blame on the affair partner is misplaced. Certainly she is not an admirable person for being involved with a married man, but if the real issue is that resentment and animosity still lingers for what the father did, then be upfront about that and disinvite HIM to the wedding in a straightforward manner. Then there won't be any issue about the affair partner being in attendance either. |