Oyster-Adam teacher arrested

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, I'm just old-fashioned about certain things, even though some of my best friends are gay. I would not be leaving my ten year old son alone with a gay man. Nor would I send my two year old daughter to a daycare where a man would be cleaning her up after a poopy diaper. Just too out-of-sorts for me. Sorry.


Would you leave your 10 year old daughter alone with a heterosexual male teacher?
NP. Absolutely not! And any hetero male teacher would be smart enough to refuse to be alone with 10 year old kids if they have half a brain.

Exactly.


When you say 'alone' do you mean 1 on 1? If so, I agree with you. As a teacher I make sure that I am never 1 on 1 with kids. This has nothing to do with my sexual behaviors or the gender of the students I am around. It is simply never smart to be 1 on 1 with students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, I'm just old-fashioned about certain things, even though some of my best friends are gay. I would not be leaving my ten year old son alone with a gay man. Nor would I send my two year old daughter to a daycare where a man would be cleaning her up after a poopy diaper. Just too out-of-sorts for me. Sorry.


Would you leave your 10 year old daughter alone with a heterosexual male teacher?
NP. Absolutely not! And any hetero male teacher would be smart enough to refuse to be alone with 10 year old kids if they have half a brain.

Exactly.


When you say 'alone' do you mean 1 on 1? If so, I agree with you. As a teacher I make sure that I am never 1 on 1 with kids. This has nothing to do with my sexual behaviors or the gender of the students I am around. It is simply never smart to be 1 on 1 with students.

The word "alone" (with a student/child) is very clear.
Anonymous
Breaks my heart to say I told you so, but I'm one of the PPs who said that an arrest this fast most likely meant really solid evidence right from the start. Usually physical evidence, for things to move this fast. True, when you have a high profile or well-connected victim, things also move fast (and sometimes not in a just way if it didn't really happen), but usually in child sex abuse, something this fast means there's physical evidence. Which apparently there was.

Very sad, for this child and any other kids he may have abused. And what a waste for him, if he was such a well-loved and great teacher, he just kissed his entire teaching career and any career involving kids goodbye.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, I'm just old-fashioned about certain things, even though some of my best friends are gay. I would not be leaving my ten year old son alone with a gay man. Nor would I send my two year old daughter to a daycare where a man would be cleaning her up after a poopy diaper. Just too out-of-sorts for me. Sorry.


Would you leave your 10 year old daughter alone with a heterosexual male teacher?
NP. Absolutely not! And any hetero male teacher would be smart enough to refuse to be alone with 10 year old kids if they have half a brain.

Exactly.


When you say 'alone' do you mean 1 on 1? If so, I agree with you. As a teacher I make sure that I am never 1 on 1 with kids. This has nothing to do with my sexual behaviors or the gender of the students I am around. It is simply never smart to be 1 on 1 with students.

The word "alone" (with a student/child) is very clear.


Not really all that clear. It was stated that a male teacher should never be left along with kid(s). As in- a male teacher should not be unsupervised with a classroom full of children.
But- go back to being condescending. It works well for you!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, I'm just old-fashioned about certain things, even though some of my best friends are gay. I would not be leaving my ten year old son alone with a gay man. Nor would I send my two year old daughter to a daycare where a man would be cleaning her up after a poopy diaper. Just too out-of-sorts for me. Sorry.


Would you leave your 10 year old daughter alone with a heterosexual male teacher?
NP. Absolutely not! And any hetero male teacher would be smart enough to refuse to be alone with 10 year old kids if they have half a brain.


Would you leave your 10 old daughter alone with her father?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh geez, now we are getting into the crazies that will never let their kids (boys or girls) be alone with men. Because every man is a potential pedophile.

It just takes one.


That's like saying we shouldn't drive because it only takes one auto accident to kill you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh geez, now we are getting into the crazies that will never let their kids (boys or girls) be alone with men. Because every man is a potential pedophile.

It just takes one.


That's like saying we shouldn't drive because it only takes one auto accident to kill you.

No, not at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, I'm just old-fashioned about certain things, even though some of my best friends are gay. I would not be leaving my ten year old son alone with a gay man. Nor would I send my two year old daughter to a daycare where a man would be cleaning her up after a poopy diaper. Just too out-of-sorts for me. Sorry.


Would you leave your 10 year old daughter alone with a heterosexual male teacher?
NP. Absolutely not! And any hetero male teacher would be smart enough to refuse to be alone with 10 year old kids if they have half a brain.


Would you leave your 10 old daughter alone with her father?

Don't leave your kid with creeps.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why o why does an 11 y.o. have access to snapchat or any other site like this? Get them a phome if necessary and lock that stuff out.


This is a very important issue PP has raised. The abuse happened in the classroom (I'm still nauseous about that) and digitally. This teacher may have never been technically "alone" with this child, but still managed to damage the victim for life. But we can do things to minimize the risks.

We have one child at OA and another at a different school. The non-OA school has had several internet safety seminars for elementary grades to inform parents about the advantages and dangers of social media and the digital world. Snapchat was on the "do not allow" list provided by our other school. They cited the terms of use and commented that it's a slippery slope from Snapkidz to Snapchat. Hopefully some victimization can be prevented with more info.


From Snapchat site. Snapchat is intended for people who are at least 13 years old. Persons under the age of 13 are prohibited from creating Snapchat accounts. For certain features or functionality offered by us or others through the Services, users must be at least 18 years old. Those Services may be subject to separate terms from us or third parties that contain these further age requirements. If you are under 18 and use those Services, you may be violating the third party’s governing terms, which we deem a violation of these Terms as well. We do, however, offer a limited-functionality version of Snapchat, called “Snapkidz,” for children under the age of 13. Snapkidz includes the familiar interface for taking Snaps, captioning, drawing, and saving Snaps locally on the device, but does not support sending or receiving Snaps or adding friends and, since the experience is local to the user’s device, no Snapchat account is created.
Anonymous
Without that snapchat proof, it might have been another "he said, he said" (not "she" in this case) and denied and swept under the carpet. Yet again.

Considering the evidence, the perp had to admit guilt.
Let's not fool ourselves here.

He's been abusing kids for a while. And now finally got caught. Red handed.
Anonymous
A fourth grader. How terrible for this child.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A fourth grader. How terrible for this child.

And all the other children he has molested.
Hope he gets the sh*t raped out of him in jail.
Yep, I'm livid about this. Can you tell?
Who cares how nice you thought he was?
Anonymous
Wait!

Where are you guys reading that there are photos and a confession?
Anonymous
It's in the WJLA article.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wait!

Where are you guys reading that there are photos and a confession?


http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/06/oyster-adams-bilingual-school-teacher-arrested-in-child-sex-abuse-case-114461.html
Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Go to: