|
The Qur'an mentions the actual shape of the earth in the following verse: “And the earth, moreover, Hath He made egg shaped.” Al- Quran 79:30 The Arabic word for egg here is dahaha, which means an ostrich-egg. The shape of an ostrich-egg resembles the geo-spherical shape of the earth. Thus the Qur’aan correctly describes the shape of the earth, though the prevalent notion when the Qur’aan was revealed was that the earth is flat. Thus the Qur'an and modern established science are in perfect harmony. |
So? Bruce Gibson predicted a lot of things about science and the current world we live in. That doesn't make Neuromancer a holy text. |
William Gibson, not Bruce Gibson. My bad. |
Qu'ran 18:86. "Until he reached the place of the setting sun, he found it setting in a spring of dark mud, and found people about." |
Do you know the verse? Look it up. How do you explain it? Do you really think god mandated that husbands hit their wives to keep them in line? If so, how do you rationalize it? |
It's funny. A quick Google turns up several translations if 79:30, but all of these translations use the word "flat" or variants thereof, not "egg-shaped." Try this Muslim source, for example: http://Quran.com/79/30 which says "flat." Or other sources that look to be Islamic, like www.islamawakened.com/Quran/79/30/default.htm which translates this as, "and the earth, he expanded after that." I'm wondering how a single word could mean both "flat" and "egg-shaped" and why Muslim translators generally go with "flat" or variants like "extended." |
Woow, what a huge leap!!!! Where did I disparage other religions???? In what part of "human speculation" did you get religion? the word religion was not even mentioned there? Do not put words in my mouth, and yes you do sound angry and I have no reason why. Where did i write OTHER RELIGIONS= SPECULATION??? just show me? smh Now, when you do quote the Quran, please do your research first about what the verse is about instead of quoting blindly, every verse in the quran was revealed for a specific purpose at a specific time, it is just not a storybook. Every verse in the Qur’an must be read and interpreted against the background of the Qur'an as a whole. This is essential if we are to get a more accurate understanding of the Qur’an. So lets look at the verse you've quoted here: 9:5 Kill the disbelievers wherever you find them. This verse, often called “the verse of the sword”, has been misquoted in a manner similar to the previous verses. First, we shall provide the verse in its context and look at the verse that comes right after it, instead of just taking one verse and ignoring the context like this makes sense out of context : 9:5-6 But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge. " This verse was revealed towards the end of the revelation period and relates to a limited context. Hostilities were frozen for a three-month period during which the Arabs pledged not to wage war. Prophet Muhammad was inspired to use this period to encourage the combatants to join the Muslim ranks or, if they chose, to leave the area that was under Muslims rule; however, if they were to resume hostilities, then the Muslims would fight back until victorious. One is inspired to note that even in this context of war, the verse concludes by emphasizing the divine attributes of mercy and forgiveness. To minimize hostilities, the Qur’an ordered Muslims to grant asylum to anyone, even an enemy, who sought refuge. Asylum would be granted according to the customs of chivalry; the person would be told the message of the Qur’an but not coerced into accepting that message. Thereafter, he or she would be escorted to safety regardless of his or her religion. (9:6). Therefore, this verse once again refers to those pagans who would continue to fight after the period of peace. It clearly commands the Muslims to protect those who seek peace and are non-combatants. It is a specific verse with a specific ruling and can in no way be applied to general situations. The command of the verse was only to be applied in the event of a battle. As Abdullah Yusuf Ali writes: The emphasis is on the first clause: it is only when the four months of grace are past, and the other party show no sign of desisting from their treacherous design by right conduct, that the state of war supervenes - between Faith and Unfaith. This verse is quoted during a battle. ...We know that America was once at war with Vietnam. Suppose the President of America or the General of the American Army told the American soldiers during the war: “Wherever you find the Vietnamese, kill them”. Today if I say that the American President said, “Wherever you find Vietnamese, kill them” without giving the context, I will make him sound like a butcher. But if I quote him in context, that he said it during a war, it will sound very logical, as he was trying to boost the morale of the American soldiers during the war. ...Similarly in Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 the Qur’an says, “Kill the Mushriqs (pagans) where ever you find them”, during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur’an is telling Muslim soldiers is, don’t be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them. Now if you look at CHAPTER9 of the Quran as a whole, this chapter of the Qur’an was revealed in the context when the newly organized Muslim society in Madinah was engaged in defending themselves against the pagan aggressors. The major question dealt with here is, as to how the Muslims should treat those who break an existing treaty at will. The first clause in the verse refers to the time-honored Arab custom of a period of warning and waiting given to the offenders, after a clear violation. That is, they will be given four months’ time to repair the damage done or make peace. But if nothing happens after the expiry of these forbidden months, what should be done? This is what the present verse says. According to this verse, fighting must be resumed until one of the two things happens: Either the enemy should be vanquished by relentless fighting. That is what is meant by {then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem [of war]}; or they should repent, establish prayers and pay zakah, etc. This is one of those verses of the Qur’an which are likely to be misunderstood, if quoted out of context. We must understand that this fighting was against a people who forced the Prophet and his companions to leave not only their own homes but all their property and even their hometown of Makkah to Madinah. Once the Muslims were organized into a community in those lawless times, the rules to be followed by the Muslims were clearly laid down, even in the matter of war. Since Islam is a comprehensive system, no human activity could be ignored. And given the nature of mankind, we cannot imagine a situation where fighting is completely ruled out either. As can be seen, the above injunctions on fighting is not on an individual level, but only in the case of a society that strives to flourish and thrive as a nation. But even here the norms are clear: fighting is only in self defence or for the establishment of justice; and always fighting is the last option. And no one is allowed to transgress the limits set by God. Now, you and I both now there are very violent verses in the Bible, actually the BIBLE has been proven to be MORE VIOLENT than the Qu'ran, but I have no interest in quoting those bible verses because I know that everything was revealed in a context at a different time. I kinda use my brain....sometimes
|
Who has translated that? Do you speak arabic, and really Google is now the authority on this lol. ANYONE can translate anything on Google, now how about you go to a Christian or Atheist Arabic speaker who has no dogs in this fight and ask him/her what that Word means in Arabic? You can get 100 translated Qurans and get 100 different words, that is why muslims recite the Quran in its original form which is ARABIC, the arabic language is so complex that whenever you translate it a lot is lost in translation |
Being on the Internet must be unimaginably difficult for you, what with your sizable control issues.
As far as atheists proclaiming their rejection of gods and such, then professing to have insight into what said gods believe, that seems perfectly reasonable. If I ran into someone who claimed to worship Huck Finn, I would think that was crazy, but even crazier would be if they claimed some special insight into the mind of Huck Finn that is inaccessible to those who merely read the book. Anyone can read the Bible. What I find funny is when Christian literalists somehow imagine that any adult human who has read the Bible is incapable of understanding the plain words written therein because they don't have "faith". Is it like belief in Tinkerbell where you have to clap really, really hard before the light comes on?
|
The fact that the earth is not flat has been known for thousands of years. The Ancient Greeks Pythagoras (570 - 495 BC), Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) and Hipparchus (190 - 120 BC) all knew this. The Indian astronomer and mathematician, Aryabhata (476 - 550 AD) knew this. And so did the early Christian scholars Anicius Boëthius (480 - 524 AD), Bishop Isidore of Seville (560 - 636 AD), Bishop Rabanus Maurus (780 - 856 AD), the monk Bede (672 - 735 AD), Bishop Vergilius of Salzburg (700 - 784 AD) and Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274 AD). In fact, contrary to what we are often told, the sphericity of the earth was common knowledge among early medieval Europeans[2] and the Holy Roman Empire from as early as 395 AD used an orb to represent the spherical Earth.[3] |
|
OK 9:42. I am going to be your friend here. You need to step away and take a break from this.
You definitely implied that Islam is superior to other religions because it's divinely revealed while other religions are based on speculation. You can't interpret away what you already said. Likewise, nobody is impressed by long cut-and-pastes about how, when Mohammad was consolidating his takeover of Medina, he gave the iriginal residents there, the ones who refused to accept him and Islam, several months to make an unpalatable choice between conversion, fleeing, death in battle, or slavery. Yes, slavery was the outcome for people lost a battle against Mohammed, unless they converted to Islam in which case they could go free, and this is actually alluded to in your long quote above. Likewise, it's hard to accept creative translations that turn "flat" into "egg-shaped." We're all waiting for you to even acknowledge another PP's point about wife-beating. Please, help yourself out here, and don't dig deeper. |
These are MUSLIM sources. MUSLIMS did the translations. Go to the links yourself and check. In turn, could you please give a source got "egg-shaped"? |
I did not know you were referring to a verse, I thought you were referring to a previous post lol. Ah the famous quranic verse that nonmuslims love. LOL Again, the word DARABA. Open the 10th reading of Edward William Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon, a 3,064-page volume from the 19th century.Among the six pages of definitions for daraba, one of them is "to go away.". So my question to you is, why do people use whatever word they like when they translate the Quran? That's what is shocking to me. the "beat" translation contradicts another verse, which states that if a woman wants a divorce, she should not be mistreated. Given the option of staying in the marriage and being beaten, or divorcing, women would obviously leave. When the prophet had difficulty with his wives, what did he do? He didn't beat anybody, so why would any Muslim do what the prophet did not?" And I am a WOMAN, I am MUSLIM, I would never follow a religion that was detrimental to my essence as a woman! |
Please cut it out with the "non-muslims" bullshit. This is a verse in the Quran and is for the reading by anyone. I was raised Muslim - I know the verse well, and there is no justifying it - in fact, many Quranic scholars have outright claimed that the verse is not authentic and was added later, because there simply is no explaining it. What's your take? Do you think the verse is divinely given, or was added by humans? |
I just cliked on the link you gave and it says SPREAD,so where are you getting flat from? egg-shaped is from the arabic itself , the meaning of the word For dahâ means to "shape like an egg", its noun being dahiyah, which the Arabs still use to mean an egg. The same word can also mean spread out, and this is why i said, you have to understand the arabic word. Westerners who have written translation books on english-arabic will give you pages and pages of translation for one arabic word, it is not as simple as some make it seem. You can read this if you want about the egg-shape translation http://turntoislam.com/community/threads/egg.19312/ |