Comparing Emory/USC/UCLA/NYU to one another, is like comparing apples to oranges to grapes. Each school has a distinct mission/vibe/offerings. That’s one reason why most rankings should be taken with a grain of salt. Better to rank specific programs/majors. Emory is great but there are dozens of lower-ranked places that are better/more appropriate for a comp sci/engineering major. |
Only if you still live in the 1980s Nationally this is how employers would think of USC for example, https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking |
Yes, but employers are not “most people.” |
While U.S. News offers rankings specific to particular categories, other sources, such as WalletHub', offer general rankings inclusive of undergraduate colleges and universities.
https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750 |
Employers > most people |
Okay but this is a totally different argument now from what was originally claimed. |
Parents and students also would think that hence, it has lower acceptance rate and huger yield rate even without ED than Emory. |
They are likely saying either 1) USNWR rankings (but there is ambiguity there because there are both national university and national liberal arts college rankings) or 2) whatever they think top 25 might be (which could include an amalgam of multiple rankings or their own viewpoint). |
NYU and Northeastern also have lower acceptance rate and higher yield rate than Emory and UVA(even for a relatively highly ranked state flagship). |
We trust that you are out of date. UVA and NYU are in the same AAA ballpark. USC is now in the majors. Only one of these schools does not have ED — and still has a minuscule acceptance rate. Kids are now voting with their feet: watch the soles of their shoes as they leave you in the dust for the West. |
You keep trying to claim these views are out of date but they really aren’t. |
Nationally, I reckon most people would think of USC as being the school in Columbia. And for darn sure wouldn't consider the USC in California to be more prestigious than UVA, NYU, UCLA, or Emory for that matter. |
Most people are not elite themselves to be able to get into any of these schools. It's also dependent on income and class. Private school students will quickly think Emory and UCLA are more prestigious. Here's Based an example... https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/s/0cxYjK3aEU For US news reputation scores, UCLA and Emory/UVA are seen more favorably than NYU and USC (4.4, 4.2, 4.0, 3.9 respectively). Emory/UVA have more impressive graduates and Lastly, Emory has more elite peers schools than NYU and USC when looking at which schools choose each other as peers. https://www.chronicle.com/article/who-does-your-college-think-its-peers-are?sra=true |
And USC has lower test scores. Emory has a wealthier students body. Emory has better per capita placement into Wallstreet, medschool and elite grad schools. Would USC's yeild be high if it wasn't in LA? |
Two problems here. If Scooter Brawn is a household name, you'd know his name was spelled Braun. and second LMAO - that is not an endorsement for Emory! |