Supreme Court stays decision to stop Virginia purge of noncitizens

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another solid and correct decision by the SC.

Another partisan decision by the corrupt SCOTUS.

As in, "I don't like the decision", so it must be corrupt, no matter the Court's reasoning.

Please identify and explain the court’s reasoning.

hint— there isn’t any!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another solid and correct decision by the SC.

Another partisan decision by the corrupt SCOTUS.

As in, "I don't like the decision", so it must be corrupt, no matter the Court's reasoning.

As in, this court is corrupt, as demonstrated by their many partisan, anti-American rulings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another solid and correct decision by the SC.

Another partisan decision by the corrupt SCOTUS.

As in, "I don't like the decision", so it must be corrupt, no matter the Court's reasoning.

As in, this court is corrupt, as demonstrated by their many partisan, anti-American rulings.

Nope. The only people who think that are lunatic Dems who don't get the ruling they want. *shrug*
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another solid and correct decision by the SC.

Another partisan decision by the corrupt SCOTUS.

As in, "I don't like the decision", so it must be corrupt, no matter the Court's reasoning.

As in, this court is corrupt, as demonstrated by their many partisan, anti-American rulings.

Nope. The only people who think that are lunatic Dems who don't get the ruling they want. *shrug*
DP

You must be new here.

What one party does will be soon outmatched by the other.

The Robert’s Court will be matched sometime in the near future my friend with the liberal version of the same soft corruption. It always is.

Will you be so *smug* then?

[Anonymous]

A sort of maybe unrelated question. We received a voter registration card in a name not recognizable to us. Looks like a young voter with an uncommon name. We live on a small street in NW DC, and don’t even have a visible house number. It’s our address. No mistake. But not a person that’s ever lived here.

What could this be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another solid and correct decision by the SC.

Another partisan decision by the corrupt SCOTUS.

As in, "I don't like the decision", so it must be corrupt, no matter the Court's reasoning.

As in, this court is corrupt, as demonstrated by their many partisan, anti-American rulings.

Nope. The only people who think that are lunatic Dems who don't get the ruling they want. *shrug*
DP

SCOTUS is objectively partisan and corrupt.

[Anonymous]

2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

Bullsh**.

No one knows how many are eligible voters and if you did you would post a source but you just want to spread your lies before the election.

Also DOJ stopped looking for eligible voters after they found eight which is another way it’s obvious you are lying.

Also with the bogus quotes around “noncitizens” — there are a thousand reasons someone could be in Virginia legally but not be entitled to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A sort of maybe unrelated question. We received a voter registration card in a name not recognizable to us. Looks like a young voter with an uncommon name. We live on a small street in NW DC, and don’t even have a visible house number. It’s our address. No mistake. But not a person that’s ever lived here.

What could this be?

You could put it back in the mail with, “Return to sender, addressee unknown” written across it. Then the voter registration office would know a mistake had been made.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

We are at the "make up stuff with no source because it sounds good to my bias" stage

Actually, we have been at this stage for a long time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A sort of maybe unrelated question. We received a voter registration card in a name not recognizable to us. Looks like a young voter with an uncommon name. We live on a small street in NW DC, and don’t even have a visible house number. It’s our address. No mistake. But not a person that’s ever lived here.

What could this be?

It’s likely that they were registered by a paid firm. There may have been a typo in the quadrant ie NE vs NW. Or could be fraud. It’s common for people to be paid per new registrations submitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

Bullsh**.

No one knows how many are eligible voters and if you did you would post a source but you just want to spread your lies before the election.

Also DOJ stopped looking for eligible voters after they found eight which is another way it’s obvious you are lying.

Also with the bogus quotes around “noncitizens” — there are a thousand reasons someone could be in Virginia legally but not be entitled to vote.

When the people got their IDs they refused to answer the question on the form that verifies if they were a citizen. As a result, they will need to verify their citizenship before they can vote. Not sure why this is so complicated to understand. Unless you don’t care if non-citizens vote or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

Bullsh**.

No one knows how many are eligible voters and if you did you would post a source but you just want to spread your lies before the election.

Also DOJ stopped looking for eligible voters after they found eight which is another way it’s obvious you are lying.

Also with the bogus quotes around “noncitizens” — there are a thousand reasons someone could be in Virginia legally but not be entitled to vote.

When the people got their IDs they refused to answer the question on the form that verifies if they were a citizen. As a result, they will need to verify their citizenship before they can vote. Not sure why this is so complicated to understand. Unless you don’t care if non-citizens vote or not.

JFC how many times do we need to point out that this list was generated by doing partial ID matches.

It’s not that the registrars know these people self-ID’d as non-citizens— in many cases they know they did not.

It’s that they share a name or some other info with someone who did.

The list is crap and that’s why Congress said if you are going to do this you should do it at least 90 days before an election.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile Virginia LEFT the program that let’s states share info on voters who move from state to state so they lost the best source on reliable data about voters who are ineligible because they are registered elsewhere.

Youngkin doesn’t care about having a clean voter list and these posters don’t either. They just care about sowing fear and division to gain political points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2 of them turned out to be citizens.

1,598 of them are criminal aliens who broke the law by registering in the first place.

Why isn’t the Department of Justice criminally prosecuting these 1,598 illegal “noncitizens” ?

Bullsh**.

No one knows how many are eligible voters and if you did you would post a source but you just want to spread your lies before the election.

Also DOJ stopped looking for eligible voters after they found eight which is another way it’s obvious you are lying.

Also with the bogus quotes around “noncitizens” — there are a thousand reasons someone could be in Virginia legally but not be entitled to vote.

When the people got their IDs they refused to answer the question on the form that verifies if they were a citizen. As a result, they will need to verify their citizenship before they can vote. Not sure why this is so complicated to understand. Unless you don’t care if non-citizens vote or not.

JFC how many times do we need to point out that this list was generated by doing partial ID matches.

It’s not that the registrars know these people self-ID’d as non-citizens— in many cases they know they did not.

It’s that they share a name or some other info with someone who did.

The list is crap and that’s why Congress said if you are going to do this you should do it at least 90 days before an election.

The truth _does_not_matter_ to Republicans.

They are going to stick to their talking points until Election Day.