Do you feel marital money is truly equal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These replies are wild. I say go back to work and pay for your parents, OP. I imagine you’ll have to pay someone from his salary to cover what you currently do as a SAHM. Once he realizes how much not having a SAHM taking care of everything is cutting into his lifestyle, he may be more willing to pay.

I find it so cute and naive when housewives threaten to go back to work as a form of punishment to man they have been dependent on.

It is so adorable.

I love it when men say this. If you died, your SAHW would get your life insurance and hardly miss a beat. Your family would probably be happier without having to compromise to your wants.
If she died, your kids would be miserable, and your life would probably completely change.

I always wonder what it’s like to feel completely expendable to your family.

Not PP but it doesn't need to change. He could pay anyone to clean his house and take care of kids. He has lots of money. Unless you think his SAH wife is irreplaceable? LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These replies are wild. I say go back to work and pay for your parents, OP. I imagine you’ll have to pay someone from his salary to cover what you currently do as a SAHM. Once he realizes how much not having a SAHM taking care of everything is cutting into his lifestyle, he may be more willing to pay.

I find it so cute and naive when housewives threaten to go back to work as a form of punishment to man they have been dependent on.

It is so adorable.

I love it when men say this. If you died, your SAHW would get your life insurance and hardly miss a beat. Your family would probably be happier without having to compromise to your wants.
If she died, your kids would be miserable, and your life would probably completely change.

I always wonder what it’s like to feel completely expendable to your family.

Not PP but it doesn't need to change. He could pay anyone to clean his house and take care of kids. He has lots of money. Unless you think his SAH wife is irreplaceable? LOL

Yes. I do.
You don’t think that kids would want their dad around more after their mom died?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These replies are wild. I say go back to work and pay for your parents, OP. I imagine you’ll have to pay someone from his salary to cover what you currently do as a SAHM. Once he realizes how much not having a SAHM taking care of everything is cutting into his lifestyle, he may be more willing to pay.

I find it so cute and naive when housewives threaten to go back to work as a form of punishment to man they have been dependent on.

It is so adorable.

I love it when men say this. If you died, your SAHW would get your life insurance and hardly miss a beat. Your family would probably be happier without having to compromise to your wants.
If she died, your kids would be miserable, and your life would probably completely change.

I always wonder what it’s like to feel completely expendable to your family.

Not PP but it doesn't need to change. He could pay anyone to clean his house and take care of kids. He has lots of money. Unless you think his SAH wife is irreplaceable? LOL

Come on. A nanny isn’t going to do what a mom does, unless she is a house manager as well and lives there full time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, this thread has convinced me to never be a SAHM. And to tell my daughters to avoid being SAHMs as well.

Imagine having a spouse who earns 7 figures a year, with a family net worth of possibly 8 figures. Only to be trekking to your $20 an hour job to pay for your parents' nursing home bills in the cheapest and most run-down institution.
We all know nursing homes are rife with neglect and abuse. It's fine as a last resort. But I don't know how people can feel comfortable living in luxury knowing their elderly parents are suffering due to a lack of financial resources. (Unless there's a family rift.)

OP basically would have more money at her disposal if she were to get a divorce than right now.

OP here. We do have 8 figure savings. Our kids go to private school and we easily spend $100k+ on just travel per year.

My parents were immigrants and any savings they had were wiped out when my mom got cancer. Their only asset was their house, which we eventually paid off.

DH said I can choose how to help my family. I don’t think he is happy about it but he will do what needs to be done. Our kids’ college funds are fully funded.

I would be embarrassed to have that income, savings and spending and not help especially when their savings got wiped out by cancer.

I’d be embarrassed to have that income and not be willing to go back to work to help my parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If my DH’s parents really needed money - even if it was due to their bad choices - I would never leave them high and dry. I would also step up to help care for them if need be. I’ve always been of the belief that families should take care of their elderly relatives and I consider my in-laws part of my family. I admire cultures that have that ethos.

+1.

My parents aren’t retired yet, but DH spends money and limited vacation time flying out to visit them 2-3 times a year.

So if you were a SAHM and your parents needed money you would get a job to support them?

Probably not. I work part time and DH balks when I pick up additional work, even if I still take care of all the kid stuff. The house is messy, dinner isn’t made, I’m tired, everything is a little stressful.
He would not be cool with my picking up more work and then keeping all of the money for myself.

So if your parents were sick and needed help financially, you would be willing to get a job keep all the money and spent all your husbands money and your parents aide? Well, no wonder men hate women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If my DH’s parents really needed money - even if it was due to their bad choices - I would never leave them high and dry. I would also step up to help care for them if need be. I’ve always been of the belief that families should take care of their elderly relatives and I consider my in-laws part of my family. I admire cultures that have that ethos.

+1.

My parents aren’t retired yet, but DH spends money and limited vacation time flying out to visit them 2-3 times a year.

So if you were a SAHM and your parents needed money you would get a job to support them?

Probably not. I work part time and DH balks when I pick up additional work, even if I still take care of all the kid stuff. The house is messy, dinner isn’t made, I’m tired, everything is a little stressful.
He would not be cool with my picking up more work and then keeping all of the money for myself.

No matter what DCUM says, most high earning men are not wishing their SAHM wives would return to work.

You are completely wrong on your assumption. If you follow courtroom, statistics, you will see most men would stay at home. Wives never agreed to that situation, and we’re blindsided when they had children.

[Anonymous]

No I do not. I am am furiously searching for other opportunities - even contract work! - to increase my income because I know my husband is resentful of being the primary breadwinner (even if he never says so).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These replies are wild. I say go back to work and pay for your parents, OP. I imagine you’ll have to pay someone from his salary to cover what you currently do as a SAHM. Once he realizes how much not having a SAHM taking care of everything is cutting into his lifestyle, he may be more willing to pay.

I find it so cute and naive when housewives threaten to go back to work as a form of punishment to man they have been dependent on.

It is so adorable.

I love it when men say this. If you died, your SAHW would get your life insurance and hardly miss a beat. Your family would probably be happier without having to compromise to your wants.
If she died, your kids would be miserable, and your life would probably completely change.

I always wonder what it’s like to feel completely expendable to your family.

Not PP but it doesn't need to change. He could pay anyone to clean his house and take care of kids. He has lots of money. Unless you think his SAH wife is irreplaceable? LOL

Come on. A nanny isn’t going to do what a mom does, unless she is a house manager as well and lives there full time.

You don’t even understand how many things stay at home moms do the kids do not give a F about. Nobody cares who cook the food or clean the house or bought doilies to make additional pretty. They really just want time to talk to somebody, connect, do things with most men do the things the children care about. Women do all the other things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No I do not. I am am furiously searching for other opportunities - even contract work! - to increase my income because I know my husband is resentful of being the primary breadwinner (even if he never says so).

Even contract work! Oh, the horror

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If my DH’s parents really needed money - even if it was due to their bad choices - I would never leave them high and dry. I would also step up to help care for them if need be. I’ve always been of the belief that families should take care of their elderly relatives and I consider my in-laws part of my family. I admire cultures that have that ethos.

+1.

My parents aren’t retired yet, but DH spends money and limited vacation time flying out to visit them 2-3 times a year.

So if you were a SAHM and your parents needed money you would get a job to support them?

Probably not. I work part time and DH balks when I pick up additional work, even if I still take care of all the kid stuff. The house is messy, dinner isn’t made, I’m tired, everything is a little stressful.
He would not be cool with my picking up more work and then keeping all of the money for myself.

No matter what DCUM says, most high earning men are not wishing their SAHM wives would return to work.

You are completely wrong on your assumption. If you follow courtroom, statistics, you will see most men would stay at home. Wives never agreed to that situation, and we’re blindsided when they had children.

A relative is a very high earner (six figure annual salary); I know that he nudged his wife to get some kind of job/income once both their kids were teenagers. And she had help!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No I do not. I am am furiously searching for other opportunities - even contract work! - to increase my income because I know my husband is resentful of being the primary breadwinner (even if he never says so).

Even contract work! Oh, the horror

GMAFB, it’s reasonable to want to transition from FTE to FTE.

[Anonymous]

i've never met a man who wasn't resentful his wife stayed home. Unless he was a misogynist and believed in 1950s gender roles. But i have met many men who felt they had to support their wives staying home because they feel like they're not allowed to challenge the idea of "of course you making handmade halloween costumes and sitting in the car line for 2 hours a day instead of just letting the kids take the bus is the most important job in the world!!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Similar situation as you, but I would not ask my DH to pay for aides for my mom. He might offer if she was really destitute, but this is her responsibility not yours.

That’s exactly what Dave Ramsay says at least 8 times a week on his show lately. What is it with this generation of seniors that they think their grown sons and daughters owe them financial support? Their parents would have had too much self respect to ask for handouts from their grown children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i've never met a man who wasn't resentful his wife stayed home. Unless he was a misogynist and believed in 1950s gender roles. But i have met many men who felt they had to support their wives staying home because they feel like they're not allowed to challenge the idea of "of course you making handmade halloween costumes and sitting in the car line for 2 hours a day instead of just letting the kids take the bus is the most important job in the world!!"

Sounds like you hang out with losers. Real men don’t resent the mother of their children taking care of those children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i've never met a man who wasn't resentful his wife stayed home. Unless he was a misogynist and believed in 1950s gender roles. But i have met many men who felt they had to support their wives staying home because they feel like they're not allowed to challenge the idea of "of course you making handmade halloween costumes and sitting in the car line for 2 hours a day instead of just letting the kids take the bus is the most important job in the world!!"

That means you must consider sahms to be misogynists who believe in 1950s gender roles as well. And the ones who aren't are resentful that they have to be sahms.

Why do you think there is any difference between men and women in this? If a woman enjoys the sahm role, she must be every bit the misogynist her husband is. If she is not a misogynist then she must be resentful of being a sahm mom. There are no other choices. It's black or white like you said,typical borderline splitting reasoning of course lol