No you would not. You want one home. That can be dads home. |
New poster.
My ex and I split about 60-40, but school year is more like 65/35 and summer is closer to 50-50. The kids (now 8 and 11 but this started when they were 5 and 2) seem to have an easier time with getting to school, getting homework done, getting enough sleep, etc at my house. It works better for everyone for them to be here most weeknights. During the school year, my ex has every other weekend, but the weekend is Friday night through Tuesday morning. Then he has Monday night of the off week. We used to do a midweek night, and it was too much back and forth. Cutting down on the number of transitions without further reducing time with their Dad helped. |
This sounds like a good schedule! I wish other people realized that some parents are simply better at handling the school routine and that helps the kids out. This isn’t about keeping the kid away from the other parent. |
Kids don’t like 50/50 custody. Kids need a home base to feel safe and secure. Not shuttling back and forth every week for a full week. This idea is not fair to anyone except the parents. OP I’m with you but unless you can prove he can’t actually care for the child because of work I’m not sure what you can do. |
One thing I would never want is for a judge to decide a custody schedule. That judge doesn’t love your child. That judge doesn’t have any predisposition to believe you over your ex husband. That judge most likely will hate your case - never knew one that didn’t hate custody cases.
You get one shot at presenting your case. You get a small bit of attention to the facts and that attention is not uninterrupted. If your lawyer has a bad day or the judge takes a disliking to you, you live with the consequences. Plus your facts aren’t so great. Your child is six. He’s not throwing desks across the room after a visit. Lots of six year olds have issues in school because they haven’t yet learned and adapted to school behavior and they are still reeling from losing a few years of normalcy in preschool. Lots of things besides dad to blame any issues on. And if you’re really that concerned you would have sought assistance through the school through special education services due to his emotional dysregulation rather than the courts for more custody. OTOH, you aren’t going to look reasonable. Reasonable will be presenting lots of alternate 50/50 custody options that were declined. And reasonable is not suggesting that tearing an elementary school kid away from the parent they exclusively lived with for nine and a half months thinking it won’t be traumatic for the child. If school is really the big issue, give dad every Friday through Monday morning and make up the rest of the 50/50 with school break and summer. Most little kids have some transition difficulty on Mondays anyway and it’s just one day of potential school issues. And schools provide supports for this sort of thing. |
It's a long thread, so you likely missed some of the facts. Our child does have an IEP and receives services and support at school. The current every other weekend schedule is actually Friday - Monday morning. I am going to see how offering perhaps one more night and/or more summer time works. The current issue is the other parent doesn't seem to want to discuss any alternative schedules other than week on week off. |
OP, since it's not a money issue, I'd just roll with the 50-50 I'd that's what the judge orders despite it obviously being too much for him being a full time parent.
Your DH will almost certainly lose interest in having this much parenting time once he has it. Few fathers actually want to do the work of 50-50 |
NP. My kids are teens, but just something to think about cause time passes quickly. We do 2 weeks with me and 1 week with dad (and this highly deviates for our original schedule—we’ve tried to work together to figure out what was best for the kids). There is little structure at dads house—they are up all hours of the night, eat sporadically, and barely make it to school (but almost do). They come to my house exhausted, behind on schoolwork, etc. On the plus side, they have a good relationship with dad, have gained a ton of independence, and have figured out how to adapt in two very different styles of households.
|
OP here. I believe it may be a money issue for my ex based on recent negotiations. It seems as if my ex is banking on getting money from me somehow. |
It depends on the parent and kids. Often the issue is more about the parents, than the kids and you need both parents working together. If you strongly feel this way, you should be the parent who gives up the kids and lets them live with the other parent. It's not fair to the parent who loses being a parent or the kids to lose their parents. |
If you are the higher earner, you should be paying child support. If he's the higher earner, he should be paying child support. Most fathers want 50-50 and to be parents. It's sad someone would say this to justify taking away the kids from their father. The real issue is OP is the higher earner and doesn't want to pay child support. |
If the child doesn't have outside therapies, then the child having an IEP makes no difference as it doesn't impact the child when they are with dad as all services are at school. If the child had outside services and he refused to take them it would be a problem. Do every other week with for each parent with one weekday dinner for the other parent. Problem solved. It sounds like the issue is you don't want to pay child support. He should have the entire summer, not just a few weeks if he has every other weekend. |
My main concern is our child, and I know based on what’s happened the past couple years that the other parent simply doesn’t take care of them appropriately. I have been the primary custodial parent this entire time and have received no child support, so I think the actual issue is the other parent doesn’t want to pay child support, otherwise they would currently be taking a more active role in the child’s life. |
If the other parent wanted to be a parent, they should’ve been doing that this entire time. They are the one who didn’t want to. |
I would hope that a court would not trust one parent documenting that “behavior issues” were more frequent when a child was with the other parent. This is incredibly easy to manipulate, even unintentionally, and would be very difficult for even a truly unbiased third party to document. Behavior issues don’t tend to show up on a highly predictable schedule. Unless one parent is significantly depriving the child of sleep, or getting into a screaming fight with the kid every day before sending them to school, I wouldn’t expect behavioral issues to show up like clockwork on one parents days even if that parent was actually the worse parent |