Let the kids work it out

Anonymous
I let my young kids work most things out (ages 5 and 3). They don't offer timers to each other, but they do a great job generally. usually, the one who doesn't get the toy/whatever just moves on and plays with something else until it's available.

This strategy works best, though, if I'm not in the room. If I am in the room, they are more likely to tattle, complain, scream, and hit.
Anonymous
There are definitely different degrees of working it out. I can't stand it when kids are so incapable of working things out that they run and tell any parent that will listen about the slightest disagreement. If that's your kid, seriously, let them learn to work those disagreements out themselves. OMG.

I do intervene with my own boys when I see it going downhill. The older one gets bored and likes to pick on the younger in a non-physical way to get a reaction and then complains about that reaction. They both do know how to share and how to be good friends. But, when they get bored or restless or tired, ugh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have kids 3 years apart also. Yes, I do teach them strategies for getting along ... and then I back off and let them work it out, hopefully experimenting with the strategies I tried to teach them.

Eventually the older kid learned that if he always tries to get the good toys and have his way, the younger kid will (a) not play with him anymore, and/or (b) throw a screaming fit. He's learned that he needs to play nicely if he wants a playmate.

Frankly, it's more effective than Mom coming in every 15 minutes to remind him to share.

Of course, this only works if the younger one is more vocal about his wants/needs, which mine is (a blessing and curse...). If the younger is more of a "go along to get along" type, I could see wanting to jump in more so that he doesn't get pushed around.

This is OP. I guess my kids are not so advanced to think far into the future like that. In my example, my older was willing to not share with the younger because he a) wanted to play with the friend and b) wanted to play with the friend's toys. He was not thinking, oh, if I do this one day in the future my little brother might not play with me. Plus, younger idolizes older and will always want to play with older whereas older can do more things alone, like reading a book. What they needed was for me to step up and say, Older, you can play with this for 20 minutes and when the timer rings give it to your brother. When I hear them offer this sort of strategy to the other, I'll be willing to back off.[/quote]

You need to open up a separate dialogue with your older about his behavior. Specifically, you need to lay out for him your expectations, your belief that he can meet those expectations, and a clear message that there will be consequences for him if he does not.

It sounds like your expectations are that he self-regulate when it comes to sharing with his brother. Why? Because you're a family, and families share with each other and do so respectfully.

And given his age, you know he is capable of doing this without you having to tell him. How do you know this? Because he does it well at school and with his friends. So of course he can also do it with his younger sibling.

But if he chooses not to -- if he chooses to hoard toys or devices, prevent his younger sibling from participating etc. -- he will receive a consequence for his bad choice. Why? Because you're a family, and families share with each other and do so respectfully.

Give him a chance to ask questions, object, etc., and discuss it until he understands that you're serious. Then, your job as a parent is to listen -- to praise him/them when they're making good choices, and to impose consequences when they are not. But the focus right now seems to be on DC1, so keep it there until he does his part. Then you can work with DC2.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There are definitely different degrees of working it out. I can't stand it when kids are so incapable of working things out that they run and tell any parent that will listen about the slightest disagreement. If that's your kid, seriously, let them learn to work those disagreements out themselves. OMG.

I do intervene with my own boys when I see it going downhill. The older one gets bored and likes to pick on the younger in a non-physical way to get a reaction and then complains about that reaction. They both do know how to share and how to be good friends. But, when they get bored or restless or tired, ugh.


Yes!

I have friends who still do this with their squabbling elementary school kids. Their kids come tattling to them about every little thing, and instead of telling them, "Go work it out," the parents get up, go over, and put themselves in the middle of the dispute.

Of course, the situation never seems to get better because the kids have never learned how to work with each other to solve problems.

Teach skills but don't get involved unless it's getting physical. They'll figure it out.
Anonymous
OP I agree with you totally.
Anonymous
I grew up in a "Go work it out" family. Things that we couldn't work out (which were frequent) we settled physically. It was a free for all. No way in hell I brought up my kids that way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a "Go work it out" family. Things that we couldn't work out (which were frequent) we settled physically. It was a free for all. No way in hell I brought up my kids that way.


So do you intervene in all disagreements? Are your kids the tattle tales? How have you dealt with it?
Anonymous
Helping the children work it out can be asking questions so that they are more capable the next time.

Who had the truck first? Johnny did? Johnny how did you feel when Mikey grabbed it out of your hands? Hmmm....I bet that was frustrating. What solution could you guys come up with so you both get a chance? Could we use a timer? Who will set the timer?

It’s tedious, but it makes them feel empowered that they’re working on it and they can hopefully use the skills in the future. It takes practice. And it’s better than “Johnny you get the truck because Mikey was being mean”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a "Go work it out" family. Things that we couldn't work out (which were frequent) we settled physically. It was a free for all. No way in hell I brought up my kids that way.


I grew up in a similar household. The result was my older sisters (3 and 8 years older than me) wailing on me whenever they felt like it for any reason. I remember getting punched in the face for "breathing too loud" once when I was in primary school. My sisters were SHOCKED when I didn't want anything to do with them from about the age of 10 through 25.

Also, my mother's strict "don't tattle, settle it yourselves" rules also meant I never told her that my best friend's older brother was abusing me for years. She'd never helped any time another kid had hurt me, no matter how bad, so I assumed she'd just blame me for the brother abusing me to (which honestly, she probably would have). I knew my only options were let him keep abusing me but get to keep my best/only friend or give up the friend to avoid the abuse. I chose to keep the friend and he kept abusing me for another 4 years.

I don't think the right answer is intervening in every fight but you can't just let kids go all lord of the flies and expect a good outcome.
Anonymous
I am a mom to a 6yo girl and we are friends with another family with a 6yo girl. All parents involved would say they are in favor of less hovering, and encouraging kids to work it out on their own. However...

What this looks like in practice (to me) looks different between us. To illustrate an issue beyond physical interactions I'm highlighting them because while the parents are lovely people, their daughter has serious "mean girl" status brewing.

Verbally, she is very quick to pick on a weakness not just in my child, but whoever won't do her bidding. It seems like it is at it's worst in playgroups of 3 girls. But 1 on 1 often doesn't go well either.

My kid can be bossy too, but if it is pointed out to her, she will acknowledge it and look for a solution. This has everything to do with giving her constant scripts (at home, from her early preschool teachers, the types of books we read) as well as I assume, her personality.

The other child in my opinion, can have my daughter say to her "hey, that hurt my feelings, maybe we can play X instead" and will just respond "nope" and double down on whatever insult or power struggle she started. She responds to adults getting involved, and forcefully insisting on more socially permissible modeled behavior, but I think her parents wait till the situation escalates too far before they involve themselves. The damage the other kid lays down...getting other kids to fear being under her hazing keeps other kids in line and makes my kid not want to play with her.
Anonymous
I'm with you OP. My younger one (3 almost 4) still too often gets physical so I watch him like a hawk when we are in certain social situations. We also have some of the youngest kids in our various sets of friends. So upshot is that I (or DH) are often the parent most around during a get-together, playdates, etc. My takeaway as the frequent "designated parent": kids, siblings in particular, do not "work things out." They grab toys from younger kids, they don't share at all, they exclude (always this!), they fight. Every time I hear a parent say "let the kids work it out," the translation really is "I don't want to get up to help them actually work it out...."

And yes, I exaggerate, there are plenty of counterexamples, and my observation has been certainly that some families/siblings/groups of friends can be much better at getting along. And I realize that many of the PPs, myself included, hold off on intervening, but do so when things escalate (I call it the "downward spiral"). But most of the time "let them work it out" just = a parental "I'm too lazy."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a "Go work it out" family. Things that we couldn't work out (which were frequent) we settled physically. It was a free for all. No way in hell I brought up my kids that way.


I grew up in a similar household. The result was my older sisters (3 and 8 years older than me) wailing on me whenever they felt like it for any reason. I remember getting punched in the face for "breathing too loud" once when I was in primary school. My sisters were SHOCKED when I didn't want anything to do with them from about the age of 10 through 25.

Also, my mother's strict "don't tattle, settle it yourselves" rules also meant I never told her that my best friend's older brother was abusing me for years. She'd never helped any time another kid had hurt me, no matter how bad, so I assumed she'd just blame me for the brother abusing me to (which honestly, she probably would have). I knew my only options were let him keep abusing me but get to keep my best/only friend or give up the friend to avoid the abuse. I chose to keep the friend and he kept abusing me for another 4 years.

I don't think the right answer is intervening in every fight but you can't just let kids go all lord of the flies and expect a good outcome.


I’m sorry about the abuse, pp. It’s a good lesson for all of us that the easy way to parent (let them work it out themselves all the time)can be detrimental.
jjconcern
Member Offline
Thanks for your post. You express a dilemma that most parents struggle with who have children. The responses to your post were very thoughtful and informative. Let them work it out in my mind means let them do it whenever possible but with parents close enough to step in when the conflict has gone on too long or there is an unhealthy pattern occurring such as always ending in physical fights or one child always taking advantage of the other. Then it is necessary to separate them and talk privately with them about what you are observing at the time and then later when they are in a less agitated state. There are always two sides to the story so don't assume that it is just one child's fault. When at a friend's house you often don't have the luxury of being able to talk to both parties. If you find that the behavior takes place regularly then assess whether you want your child to continue playing there. Parenting takes so much skill and patience . The main thing is don't assume that your child is always right. You do them a disservice by never confronting their part in a conflict which has lifelong consequences for them.
Anonymous
Its lazy parenting for parents who don't want to be involved. I agree with you OP, even a year or two difference makes a huge difference and its very easy for the older one to "win." My parents were like that and I always got screwed over. I always intervene and help them through it.
Anonymous
There are degrees of "work it out". I take that approach, but that doesn't mean I don't monitor or intervene. It's a strategy that works with my kids b/c there's not a clear winner between my two kids. The flip side of this is my parents always intervened when my brother and I fought growing up. They only saw my reaction, not all the mean, cruel things my brother did to me. So I got into trouble. Now looking back on how much my parents protected their darling baby boy, they feel bad for how he treated me. As a parent, it's hard to tell who really "started it" and who should be punished. So in addition to teaching my kids how to work it out and do problem solving with them, I also punish both of them for fighting. I avoid taking sides (but will if it's clear what happened).

Like everything with parenting, one approach all the time is not the best way to do things. You need a number of tools in your arsenal and use what approach is appropriate at the time. I bet you will see that the parents who encourage the work it out strategy don't use it exclusively.
post reply Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids
Message Quick Reply
Go to: