+1 Also she has used her money to "buy" your DD. You are justified in being hurt and here is why: she brings it up. What purpose does that serve except to hurt and manipulate you? |
Your parents were self-indulgent idiots and you are in denial. |
I think skipping a generation is a great way to generate wealth, but you do have to wait out the grandkids' grabby/needy/showy years. Have the trust open at 35, 40, or 45. My kids are toddlers, so the opportunity for growth may have been greater (re time at least) than for you children, who seem much older. I divorced my husband a little over a year before my mother died. She probably would have gone the exact same route had I still been with that awful man. Her money now serves her grandchildren in a way it wouldn't have if their father were still involved in financial decision making. |
| I think OP is upset because she had been hoping/planning that her mom would swoop in and pay for college for the two young children and now she's facing having to plan for that herself. While I find it distasteful, it's obvious your mother refuses to allow the son-in-law she loathes to get his hands on her money. Her right, and perhaps she's onto something since OP says he selfish. Not sure why OP worries what other people will think when mom dies and leaves her nothing. Is this something your family will discuss publicly? Tacky. |
| In general, no, I would not be upset: it's my parents' money, and I've never felt entitled to it in any way and I've never equated money with love. If they wanted to use it to help provide for my children, I'd be thrilled. But the OP's situation is more complicated--if my parents decided not to give me any money because they disapproved of me, that would be hurtful, but because of the message, not the money. |
| I'm sure that this has been covered in the 5 pages of comments, but the money is symbolic of the love you perceive is lacking in your relationship with your mother. I wish that I had some good advice for how to get over this, but my only recommendation at this point is therapy. I can relate to you on many reasons and those here that are suggesting that the OP brush this off must realize that she doesn't yet have the tools to do so. I hope that you gain these tools, OP so that one day this will not upset you. |
|
Can't stand my DIL, who has been cruel to me for no apparent reason. My estate is divided into 3 equal parts - 1 part to my favorite charities, 1 part each to my son and daughter.
They can duke it out after I'm gone, but it really burns me that my bitchy DIL will benefit from my death. Any suggestions? |
+1. Its this simple. Has nothing to do with you and your mom's relationship. She doesn't want your husband to get it. |
How many designer handbags does she have? |
|
The grandmother is trying to use her money to control and "buy" her allegiance the granddaughter. I would be livid about this and not allow it.
If my mother wanted to leave money in a trust for education or for access when the kids are older, I would be happy with this. What the OP's mother doing is completely different. She's using her money to manipulate a young girl who will have less ability to deal with this than the OP. This is a very toxic situation for young kids. |
| #richpeopleproblems |
The bolded comment seems as if you think it's just a crap shoot on how they turn out. You can raise them to be fiscally responsible, you know. In answer to your question, I'd probably be a little hurt, but I'd explain to my mother why. (DD takes after her ass-hole father, for instance.)
|
|
Granted we have no idea how much money OP is talking about. Or how much will be left after her mother dies. Or any stipulations that will be placed on the money (used for college, wedding, downpayment on first house)
But personally I would be happy if my parents left their money to the 4 grandchildren (2 mine, 2 my sister). I don't need it. And like another poster said, any money that was given to me would end up being used on my kids anyway. |
+2 |
+1. Great advice. Now, I want to go to the non-psychological manipulation aspect--just the straightforward aspect. My brother married someone very divisive and mean (I suspect mentally ill). She pretty much runs the roost and conveniently does not believe in separate property, so anything my brother gets he co-mingles. As of this year, my mom changed her will and is going to leave my half to me outright, and his half to him and his kids in trust with me as the trustee. (shoot me now for getting this handed to me but that's for another post) My mom is trying to protect my brother and grandchildren's money FOR my brother and his kids. If he inherits outright, and commingles, and they divorce, she gets half of it. And while they are still married, she has control over all of it. So this way he still has his inheritance if they divorce, and in the meantime, it helps protect their marriage because the wife can't demand that my brother co-mingle because he has no control. So she can't get mad at him. So the wife will just get mad at my mom and me (and she hates us anyways so we can't get any more dead in her eyes--we've got nothing to lose) Anyways long way to saying…you are an only child so this option wasn't available to your mom. I can assure you if I were not around, my mom would be doing the generation-skipping thing. If it really is because of your DH (and not the manipulation that the PP discussed), you could talk with your mom about designating someone (a paid attorney--don't do a relative or family friend) to be the trustee and administer a trust for you. |