Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html

ughhhh, there is a huge leap between begin a political activist and hijacking a plane Lots of people from these countries are political activists, damn it most people in the US are,ughhhh. Stop focusing on these 2 pilots, there is much more to worry about than these 2 pilots

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WHY WOULD ANYONE HIJACK A PLANE AND FLY IT FOR 7 HOURS??? WHY? WHY? WHY? DOESNT MAKE SENSE

Maybe when they first took the plane, and turned off the transponders, they knew we would think the plane crashed in the ocean. They didn't know about the subsequent satellite pinging.

I still think they took the plane to use in an attack later. We WOULDN'T all be looking for it if we thought it was at the bottom of the ocean. It's only because of the pinging that we know it flew for 7 hours - long enough to get to a hangar in a hostile state.

Why not? Wouldn't the families want to recover the bodies of their loved ones? We'd keep looking for it even if we were certain it crashed into the ocean. The Air France plane took 2 years to recover, but that didn't stop the search.

This is much more mysterious, since we have those "pings" lasting 7 hours.

If someone deliberately turned off the transponder, they probably knew about the pinging. Anyone turning off the transponder had sophisticated knowledge about that airplane.

I wonder if malfunction/explosion could have turned off the transponders and redirected the plane? It seems unlikely, but until we know, if we ever do, all of this is mere speculation. Nothing I've read leads me to believe that the plane is anywhere but at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. No reliable evidence points in any other direction -- yet.

If the plane is at the bottom of the ocean, would those bodies actually be recovered? Honest question, I don't know what the standard practice is.

Think not all bodies from the Air France crash were recovered. It might have been too deep to get to them.

[Anonymous]

Here's my theory. The motive was to steal the plane and/or persons inside it. The hijackers forced their way in when one of the pilots came out to go to the bathroom. They then held the pilot(s) at gunpoint and forced him to turn off the transponder and make the initial turns/altitude changes. The plan all along was to keep the pilot alive so he could land the plane at a pre-arranged location but a struggle ensued and the pilot was killed. The hijackers were subsequently unable to fly the plane so it continued on autopilot until it ran out of fuel and crashed into the Indian Ocean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
WHY WOULD ANYONE HIJACK A PLANE AND FLY IT FOR 7 HOURS??? WHY? WHY? WHY? DOESNT MAKE SENSE


Maybe when they first took the plane, and turned off the transponders, they knew we would think the plane crashed in the ocean. They didn't know about the subsequent satellite pinging.

I still think they took the plane to use in an attack later. We WOULDN'T all be looking for it if we thought it was at the bottom of the ocean. It's only because of the pinging that we know it flew for 7 hours - long enough to get to a hangar in a hostile state.


Why not? Wouldn't the families want to recover the bodies of their loved ones? We'd keep looking for it even if we were certain it crashed into the ocean. The Air France plane took 2 years to recover, but that didn't stop the search.

This is much more mysterious, since we have those "pings" lasting 7 hours.

If someone deliberately turned off the transponder, they probably knew about the pinging. Anyone turning off the transponder had sophisticated knowledge about that airplane.

I wonder if malfunction/explosion could have turned off the transponders and redirected the plane? It seems unlikely, but until we know, if we ever do, all of this is mere speculation. Nothing I've read leads me to believe that the plane is anywhere but at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. No reliable evidence points in any other direction -- yet.



If the plane is at the bottom of the ocean, would those bodies actually be recovered? Honest question, I don't know what the standard practice is.


Think not all bodies from the Air France crash were recovered. It might have been too deep to get to them.

Nature already is recovering them.

[Anonymous]

If they know it's possible that this plane was "cloaked" then why do they keep harping on the flight path and the pinging? They are being thrown off by that (if it's true the plane could have been "cloaked").

[Anonymous]

Anonymous



http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-to-steal-a-boeing-777-2014-3
Answer to : could a 777 land on a highway -- yes.

No you can't, grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they know it's possible that this plane was "cloaked" then why do they keep harping on the flight path and the pinging? They are being thrown off by that (if it's true the plane could have been "cloaked").

oniI have to plead ignorance... What does cloaking a plane mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html

All this is wild speculation. Call me a doubting Thomas, but a pilot who has an elaborate flight simulator set up doesn't seem that odd to me. I'd like to think that pilots who want to do a good job go out of their way to practice. And a t-shirt? That's what we're basing this on? The plane could have been hijacked, but Mr. Shah could have been the first victim for all we know.

[Anonymous]

The Iranians with the stolen passports were working WITH the pilot. The co-pilot was incapacitated somehow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they know it's possible that this plane was "cloaked" then why do they keep harping on the flight path and the pinging? They are being thrown off by that (if it's true the plane could have been "cloaked").

oniI have to plead ignorance... What does cloaking a plane mean?

it means to make planes invisible. When you’re trying to cloak an object and make it appear invisible, there are two steps to the process. First, you have to make the object invisible. Then you need to carefully blur the edges of the object. If you don’t mask the edges, the object will be noticeable as it moves around. You need to bend the light so the edges appear invisible or, at the very least, blurry. You need to make sure that the observer’s focus isn’t drawn to those edges or your “invisible” object just looks silly and attracts major attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if they spilled coffee all over the instrument panel and screwed them all up? That's the kind of thing that I would do.....

Or someone can just be sleeping and their hand falls on the instrument panel and turns the transponder off, because u lose control of ur muscles when u're asleep. The pilots never realize this, the plane is on autopilot and suddenly they start realizing weird things happening, they have no idea what is going it, they panic and turn the plane around to go back to the Malaysian airport because thats the only safe thing they can think of doing. Why did nobody think that the pilots wanted to go back to the Malaysian airport when it turned around? Because it did turn around towards Malaysia, to me that makes total sense, they had no idea what was going on and they turned around to go back to where they came from. Now, something else happened when they were headed back to Malaysia, i don't know what, maybe more mechanical failure, depressurization? who know. To me, this is way more plausible than having a hijacker just flying a plane for hours

LOL! Easy there, you might strain your brain.

LOL! Thanks for this!

[Anonymous]

New stealth technology makes airplanes invisible not only to radar, it renders them hidden to the human eye as well – just like an invisibility cloak in a Hollywood sci-fi thriller… The irony is China is one of the first developing this: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/12/17/invisible-airplanes-chinese-us-scramble-for-cloaking-tech/

[Anonymous]

I'm not an expert but I read that it also involves making the plan appear to be where it isn't, so that might explain why it seems to have gone way up and way down etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What if they spilled coffee all over the instrument panel and screwed them all up? That's the kind of thing that I would do.....

I was wondering the same thing! What's the failsafe for spilled coffee?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if they spilled coffee all over the instrument panel and screwed them all up? That's the kind of thing that I would do.....

I was wondering the same thing! What's the failsafe for spilled coffee?

I don't know but if it's this easy to crash a 777, I'm never flying again.