Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China

[Anonymous]

Maybe they were testing out the technology. That would explain why they were all on the plane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html

So with 200 plus passengers, cabin crew etc you're saying ONE man manages to disengage multiple systems AND keep hundreds of people under control? What about the co pilot, was he told to sit there and keep quiet? And being called a political 'activist' because he attended a trial of someone he believed in is a bit much. This is a weak flimsy theory. I'll believe it when I see proof that the passengers are still alive!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
One more interesting thing. 4 of 5 patent users were on that plane that day of the ‘Freescale Microchip’. The 5th was not on that plane. The 5th being Jacob Rothschild. Once they are not found and the occupants are declared deceased, this would give 1 person 100% of the patent. The patent was approved a few days after the plane disappeared. The Rothschild family also operates the Federal Reserve, and owns almost the entire global banking system except for Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. Isn’t there a war going on in Iran right now….

Now wait a minute. Wouldn't the estates of the 4 patent holders (I think that's what you mean?) hold 4/5 of the patent? And how valuable is that patent?

There's likely an easier way to get control of the patent than to hijack a plane. And who would do this and kill themselves in the process?

Some real crazy theories are growing in the absence of cold hard facts.

[Anonymous]

eople do NOT hijack aircraft for ideological, religious or political reasons and then NOT TELL ANYONE WHY. They just DONT!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:people do NOT hijack aircraft for ideological, religious or political reasons and then NOT TELL ANYONE WHY. They just DONT!

At the same point after 9/11 All Qaeda had not claimed responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
One more interesting thing. 4 of 5 patent users were on that plane that day of the ‘Freescale Microchip’. The 5th was not on that plane. The 5th being Jacob Rothschild. Once they are not found and the occupants are declared deceased, this would give 1 person 100% of the patent. The patent was approved a few days after the plane disappeared. The Rothschild family also operates the Federal Reserve, and owns almost the entire global banking system except for Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. Isn’t there a war going on in Iran right now….

Now wait a minute. Wouldn't the estates of the 4 patent holders (I think that's what you mean?) hold 4/5 of the patent? And how valuable is that patent?

There's likely an easier way to get control of the patent than to hijack a plane. And who would do this and kill themselves in the process?

Some real crazy theories are growing in the absence of cold hard facts.

It dont matter the 4 people were not on the plane they are still alive.

[Anonymous]

It doesn't really add up. If the pilot took the plane as a political protest surely he would have announced it to the flight controllers. If the plane ended up crashing why hasn't any wreckage been found yet and if he managed to land it how is he controlling over 250 people and stopping even one of them from making a break to the nearest civilisation?

[Anonymous]

Also, the Airlines released information stating that the pilot and copilot DID NOT ask to be together on this flight. It was Randomly assigned + no extra fuel was loaded on this plane

[Anonymous]

It prob landed but all the people onboard were killed, with the poss exception of the Freescale employees. Prob killed the pilot after it landed safely?

[Anonymous]

So now we learn it's possible to manually disable a black box?! This is a complete disgrace that in this day and age a plane could potentially disappear without a trace and I fear we may now never learn the truth. The government are too busy monitoring the emails I send to my wife asking whats for dinner to sort out these planes and save hundreds of live

[Anonymous]

And in a new twist, it has emerged that the pilot's wife and three children moved out of the family's home the day before the plane's disappearance.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/missing-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh370-3248001#ixzz2w97d2Fcg

[Anonymous]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoglia/2014/03/15/malaysia-air-flight-370-could-passengers-have-survived-777-ascent-to-45000-feet/?utm_campaign=forbestwittersf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html

Let's say I'm a pilot and I volunteered for the Romney campaign in the last election. So on the day after the election I'm considered as having sufficient motive to steal/hijack/crash a 777 with 200+ passengers aboard? I'm not buying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't really add up. If the pilot took the plane as a political protest surely he would have announced it to the flight controllers. If the plane ended up crashing why hasn't any wreckage been found yet and if he managed to land it how is he controlling over 250 people and stopping even one of them from making a break to the nearest civilisation?

You're right. Just a few thousand square miles to search, most of which are in water - should be easy, right? Do you know how remote and sparsely populated some of the possible landing areas are? And nothing "adds up," we don't have the whole story!

If nothing else, this tragedy has shown us just how badly people understand geography.

[Anonymous]

Yeah I'd never heard before that a black box can be disabled. I don't believe that to be true.