
It is conceivable that Flight MH370 plane is 'cloaked', hiding with high-tech electronic warfare weaponry that exists and is used. In fact, this type of technology is precisely the expertise of Freescale, that has 20 employees on board the missing flight ![]() |
What were they doing in Malaysia and why were they going to China? |
They were based in several manufacturing sites in Kuala Lumpur and Tianjin, China; 12 of the employees were from Malaysia and eight were from China. No idea why they were headed to Beijing. |
The thing is this could be it. They may never find this plane. |
Thought that people with top secret clearance working on military projects usually work on bits and pieces of a project. That way no one person can jeopardize a project if something happens to them or if they reveal their work to others. Maybe that's why they needed 20 employees. But still, thought they aren't supposed to travel together for this exact reason. |
Yes, like the President and Vice President never travel together. Why risk losing a large number of key staff? They could be on a plane that crashes unrelated to this situation. So, why not anticipate that before you put all your valuable employees on one plane? |
Just read that the twenty passengers were involved in cutting edge electronic technology used for defense purposes, including electronic warfare, such as weapons that can “cloak” or make planes invisible, appearing to vanish. Two aspects not heavily reported regarding the mystery are:
1) using today’s electronic weaponry, a plane can seemingly “vanish,” and 2) passengers aboard the missing Malaysia jet linking to contracts with the Department of Defense defense and high-tech electronic weaponry. The system can “make the real target appear to disappear or move about randomly. It is used effectively to protect aircraft from guided missiles " This can explain why the plane made a sharp left turn. |
Not the ACARS. I understand that the ACARS is a bit more difficult to turn off. |
If the plane is at the bottom of the ocean, would those bodies actually be recovered? Honest question, I don't know what the standard practice is. |
http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-to-steal-a-boeing-777-2014-3
Answer to : could a 777 land on a highway -- yes. |
For 9 days? |
That is one scary theory ! |
Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html |
Only problem with your theory is that the 4 other patent holders were NOT on the plane. Peidong Wang Zhijun Chen Zhihong Cheng Li Ying, Suzhou Check the names above against the passenger list. You will not find them listed as passengers of flight 370. |
Jeez, the pilot's family moved the day before? And this thing about 20 employees in technology on board, what a complicated mess for investigators. |