Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What did he do to cause her to want to leave him? And she should get half of his fortune from the last 19 years.

That is only true without a prenup. That is the whole point. You need to be a first wife, and sign nothing.

Really curious why attorneys wouldn't factor in inflation? $1.5 million towards a home is really not very much money in most major cities.

He would not have married her if she didn’t sign the prenup. She got the luxurious life she wanted for almost 20 years; now the agreement she signed so she could have the luxurious life goes into effect.

[Anonymous]

So she wasn’t a wife? Just some sort of throw away girlfriend?

[Anonymous]

She just getting second wife with a prenup treatment.

[Anonymous]

I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

+1 My mom stressed the importance of what you said and getting an education that would enable my sisters and me to support ourselves. She also stressed the importance of dating and marrying a partner/spouse with good character--not the jerk type who runs around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

+1 My mom stressed the importance of what you said and getting an education that would enable my sisters and me to support ourselves. She also stressed the importance of dating and marrying a partner/spouse with good character--not the jerk type who runs around.

My parents too, but it was equal. She also stressed that my brothers needed to marry someone who could support herself and who did not expect or demand to be supported without contributing back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

+1 My mom stressed the importance of what you said and getting an education that would enable my sisters and me to support ourselves. She also stressed the importance of dating and marrying a partner/spouse with good character--not the jerk type who runs around.

My parents too, but it was equal. She also stressed that my brothers needed to marry someone who could support herself and who did not expect or demand to be supported without contributing back.

PP here. I didn't have brothers but that's good advice. I do have friends who are SAHM, and they do an incredible amount of volunteer work and entertaining related to their husband's businesses. I think credit needs to be given to them as well.

[Anonymous]

Maybe it's less that Christine's legal counsel is inadequate, but more that Christine is an impossible client. Her testifying about bussing in snow for a rich person nativity has done her no favors settlement-wise.

[Anonymous]

Her going on the stand and using those examples to try to strengthen her appeal for more child support tells me this lady’s elevator does not go to the top floor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's less that Christine's legal counsel is inadequate, but more that Christine is an impossible client. Her testifying about bussing in snow for a rich person nativity has done her no favors settlement-wise.

She should be mortified by her affluenza pleas given the number of people in this country that struggle to put food on the table.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What did he do to cause her to want to leave him? And she should get half of his fortune from the last 19 years.

That is only true without a prenup. That is the whole point. You need to be a first wife, and sign nothing.

Really curious why attorneys wouldn't factor in inflation? $1.5 million towards a home is really not very much money in most major cities.

He would not have married her if she didn’t sign the prenup. She got the luxurious life she wanted for almost 20 years; now the agreement she signed so she could have the luxurious life goes into effect.

She took a risk, as did Marla Maples as 2nd wife to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's less that Christine's legal counsel is inadequate, but more that Christine is an impossible client. Her testifying about bussing in snow for a rich person nativity has done her no favors settlement-wise.

She should be mortified by her affluenza pleas given the number of people in this country that struggle to put food on the table.

All those stars should be mortified by their excessive lifestyles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her going on the stand and using those examples to try to strengthen her appeal for more child support tells me this lady’s elevator does not go to the top floor.

Yeah, this is true. Kevin doesn’t need to say anything in the PR war. She’s digging her own grave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad my mama always drilled into our heads that a man is not a plan.

+1 My mom stressed the importance of what you said and getting an education that would enable my sisters and me to support ourselves. She also stressed the importance of dating and marrying a partner/spouse with good character--not the jerk type who runs around.

My parents too, but it was equal. She also stressed that my brothers needed to marry someone who could support herself and who did not expect or demand to be supported without contributing back.

PP here. I didn't have brothers but that's good advice. I do have friends who are SAHM, and they do an incredible amount of volunteer work and entertaining related to their husband's businesses. I think credit needs to be given to them as well.

Better to marry a man who doesn’t expect you do entertaining or volunteering to raise his children.