Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Why is the jury Forman information only coming out Now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is the jury Forman information only coming out Now?

Courts don’t reveal the identities of jurors. That only comes out if jurors choose to publicly identify themselves after the trial. Or if a defendant tries to dox them as a form of jury tampering, but that’s a different scenario.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rick Gates said Manafort asked him to check in regularly with Stone about WikiLeaks disclosures and indicated that "he would be updating other people on the campaign, including the candidate."

Stone lied about this, despite the receipts that show otherwise. Gates implicates Trump in this scheme.

There is a reason Trump wants all of this buried.

Stone always seemed like a full of **** old washed up boomer.

[Anonymous]

I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

Stone already petitioned the judge to do that and the judge said no.

[Anonymous]

There are 9 people on a jury. All 9 found him guilty. Even if one was tainted, the other 8 unanimously found Stone guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

Stone tried really hard to force a mistrial by his actions. He doesn't get one. Trump is trying the same thing. Too bad for him that it won't work.

[Anonymous]

The juror, just like the Senators, swore and oath of impartiality to hear the case. If you are ok with the Senators acquitting the president, then you are ok with Stone being found guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The juror, just like the Senators, swore and oath of impartiality to hear the case. If you are ok with the Senators acquitting the president, then you are ok with Stone being found guilty.

+1

[Anonymous]

Jessie Liu, member of the Trump transition team and Trump appointee to head the DC US Attorney’s office, has resigned from her temporary position at Treasury after Trump pulled her appointment.

[Anonymous]

“White House officials say since President Trump's acquittal on impeachment charges, he is determined to assert an iron grip on government, pushing his Justice Department to ease up on friends while exacting payback on real and perceived foes.”
https://apnews.com/e613b755f0750a1df4127f054561d7d6?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP_Politics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jessie Liu, member of the Trump transition team and Trump appointee to head the DC US Attorney’s office, has resigned from her temporary position at Treasury after Trump pulled her appointment.

Bump.

Loyalty is a one-way road for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

Stone already petitioned the judge to do that and the judge said no.

And, now that evidence of a lack of impartiality on the part of the foreperson has been revealed along with the fact that one juror was a member of the Obama admin, this decision should be revisited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

Stone already petitioned the judge to do that and the judge said no.

And, now that evidence of a lack of impartiality on the part of the foreperson has been revealed along with the fact that one juror was a member of the Obama admin, this decision should be revisited.

You think the judge didn’t know that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Roger Stone. Given what is coming out about the jury, particularly the jury foreperson who actually posted derogatory information on social media regarding Roger Stone BEFORE the trial, the verdict should be thrown out. This is egregious. This person should have never been accepted as a juror.

Stone already petitioned the judge to do that and the judge said no.

And, now that evidence of a lack of impartiality on the part of the foreperson has been revealed along with the fact that one juror was a member of the Obama admin, this decision should be revisited.

Are you arguing the same for Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Jim Jordan, and all of the other dirty republicans who proclaimed loudly on every outlet that they would acquit him before hearing ANY evidence?

If you aren’t, not only are you hypocritical, but you’re a threat to the stability of our country by willfully bending the constitution to support ONE GUILTY MAN.