UVA student missing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Who on earth ARE you and why do you think you have all the answers? I definitely think your use of a huge grinning smiley face is inappropriate considering the circumstances. Yes it's great that he's caught (if he's the one who did it) but seriously, this is all very sad and not a huge reason to celebrate...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Who on earth ARE you and why do you think you have all the answers? I definitely think your use of a huge grinning smiley face is inappropriate considering the circumstances. Yes it's great that he's caught (if he's the one who did it) but seriously, this is all very sad and not a huge reason to celebrate...

It's some freak in his mother's basement. Disregard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Who on earth ARE you and why do you think you have all the answers? I definitely think your use of a huge grinning smiley face is inappropriate considering the circumstances. Yes it's great that he's caught (if he's the one who did it) but seriously, this is all very sad and not a huge reason to celebrate...

There are lots of people celebrating. You have no clue how big this is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Interesting insight. Wonder why he is not charged with murder.

He is not charged with anything yet... He has just been arrested. That's the way it works... Jackpot!

Pay attention fool... HE IS CHARGED with, Abduction With Intent To Defile

You are right... They arrested and charged. Usually they arrest and charge later.. They will add more charges ... And more and more and more..... Adios!

Don't they have to be charged before they arrested?

No usually you are arrested and then charged but with an arrest warrant you can also have charging documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Who on earth ARE you and why do you think you have all the answers? I definitely think your use of a huge grinning smiley face is inappropriate considering the circumstances. Yes it's great that he's caught (if he's the one who did it) but seriously, this is all very sad and not a huge reason to celebrate...

There are lots of people celebrating. You have no clue how big this is.

^ in his own mind

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Former public defender here . . . lawyer's don't "get people off." If they are acquitted, its by a jury because the government didn't prove its case. As it should be. If you are going to lock someone up you had better prove in court that they did it. And they had better have someone arguing their case for them, since they are up against the government with all its resources.

The system wouldn't work without defense lawyers. if they all went on strike, we would have no criminal justice system. if you want a strong and fair system, you support a vigorous defense.

+1000!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Lord... Wait until the you hear what the DNA turned up.

The crazy supporters of the murderer is going to eat crow times 4.

1 has there been a murder?

Yes, at least 1. But you are going to wait until it all comes out.....

Who on earth ARE you and why do you think you have all the answers? I definitely think your use of a huge grinning smiley face is inappropriate considering the circumstances. Yes it's great that he's caught (if he's the one who did it) but seriously, this is all very sad and not a huge reason to celebrate...

There are lots of people celebrating. You have no clue how big this is.

I now know how lynch mobs developed.

The guy is innocent until proven guilty - a fundamental tenet of jurisprudence in this country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm just relieved that they found this guy and have him in custody. In Texas which dead ends right into Mexico...one more day may have been too late.

Good job LE!

The Charlottesville police should let the Texas Rangers and Department of Public Safety have a crack at interrogating him first. I hear they're pretty effective at getting information out of suspects down there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was he trying to get to Mexico?

Galveston is basically an island. Definitely not on the direct route to Mexico.

He probably got lost on his way to Mexico

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Former public defender here . . . lawyer's don't "get people off." If they are acquitted, its by a jury because the government didn't prove its case. As it should be. If you are going to lock someone up you had better prove in court that they did it. And they had better have someone arguing their case for them, since they are up against the government with all its resources.

The system wouldn't work without defense lawyers. if they all went on strike, we would have no criminal justice system. if you want a strong and fair system, you support a vigorous defense.

If the criminals didn't know they'd get a free lawyer, maybe they'd think twice before they commit crimes. Now, for many of them it's like what the heck, I'll take my chances and the taxpayers will pick up the whole tab.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former public defender here . . . lawyer's don't "get people off." If they are acquitted, its by a jury because the government didn't prove its case. As it should be. If you are going to lock someone up you had better prove in court that they did it. And they had better have someone arguing their case for them, since they are up against the government with all its resources.

The system wouldn't work without defense lawyers. if they all went on strike, we would have no criminal justice system. if you want a strong and fair system, you support a vigorous defense.

If the criminals didn't know they'd get a free lawyer, maybe they'd think twice before they commit crimes. Now, for many of them it's like what the heck, I'll take my chances and the taxpayers will pick up the whole tab.

Riiiight, because most criminals are really thinking that they're going to be caught. And most criminals are also hoping that they'll be indigent so that they can be afforded a public defender.

You're probably one of those conservative wing nuts who thinks that food stamps causes people to quit their jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the cops still seem to think she may be found alive. WHAT DO THEY KNOW?!?

They don't believe they are going to find her alive, but they have to say these things up until they know so as not to sad hopes or take away the urgency. They told people who have large piece of land to search their property. They're clearly looking for a body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the cops still seem to think she may be found alive. WHAT DO THEY KNOW?!?

They don't believe they are going to find her alive, but they have to say these things up until they know so as not to sad hopes or take away the urgency. They told people who have large piece of land to search their property. They're clearly looking for a body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former public defender here . . . lawyer's don't "get people off." If they are acquitted, its by a jury because the government didn't prove its case. As it should be. If you are going to lock someone up you had better prove in court that they did it. And they had better have someone arguing their case for them, since they are up against the government with all its resources.

The system wouldn't work without defense lawyers. if they all went on strike, we would have no criminal justice system. if you want a strong and fair system, you support a vigorous defense.

If the criminals didn't know they'd get a free lawyer, maybe they'd think twice before they commit crimes. Now, for many of them it's like what the heck, I'll take my chances and the taxpayers will pick up the whole tab.

Troll.

Once they get this free lawyer, they're already in trouble. You think they want to go to jail just so they can get a free lawyer? yeah, that makes sense.

[Anonymous]

I watched the video again. I think the lurker is in on it with JM. First the lurker walks down and jumps in the doorway. at the same time Jesse is walking on the other side. Then Hannah walks down and the lurker jumps out like he was waiting for her then Jesse follows behind them. The lurker misled cops and said he saw a man that was bald. They are both creepy and seemed to be stalking her.