Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does she have oriole posting for her here? I can’t insgine anyone defending her.

Just a lot of women that see themselves in Christine and it scares them.

It should scare them. If you are as shallow, superficial, greedy and as incapable of managing life as an adult independently the way Christine seems to be, it should be a wake up call. If you are sexist enough to see men as nothing other than a wallet who buys you jewelry and gives you money - you need a good reality check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does she have oriole posting for her here? I can’t insgine anyone defending her.

Just a lot of women that see themselves in Christine and it scares them.

It should scare them. If you are as shallow, superficial, greedy and as incapable of managing life as an adult independently the way Christine seems to be, it should be a wake up call. If you are sexist enough to see men as nothing other than a wallet who buys you jewelry and gives you money - you need a good reality check.

I would say that he seems especially shallow, superficial, and incapable of managing life as an adult to have been divorced twice (soon to be) and have viewed her as no more than a pretty object to be on his arm and give him beautiful children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does she have oriole posting for her here? I can’t insgine anyone defending her.

Just a lot of women that see themselves in Christine and it scares them.

It should scare them. If you are as shallow, superficial, greedy and as incapable of managing life as an adult independently the way Christine seems to be, it should be a wake up call. If you are sexist enough to see men as nothing other than a wallet who buys you jewelry and gives you money - you need a good reality check.

I would say that he seems especially shallow, superficial, and incapable of managing life as an adult to have been divorced twice (soon to be) and have viewed her as no more than a pretty object to be on his arm and give him beautiful children.

Yet she is the one crying about steps from the beach and bringing in snow. She’ll be alright…she gets to use his money when she is with him and fend for herself when she leaves. She’s still young she can find another rich guy to marry but I think she will have to sign another ungenerous prenup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does she have oriole posting for her here? I can’t insgine anyone defending her.

Just a lot of women that see themselves in Christine and it scares them.

It should scare them. If you are as shallow, superficial, greedy and as incapable of managing life as an adult independently the way Christine seems to be, it should be a wake up call. If you are sexist enough to see men as nothing other than a wallet who buys you jewelry and gives you money - you need a good reality check.

I would say that he seems especially shallow, superficial, and incapable of managing life as an adult to have been divorced twice (soon to be) and have viewed her as no more than a pretty object to be on his arm and give him beautiful children.

Yet she is the one crying about steps from the beach and bringing in snow. She’ll be alright…she gets to use his money when she is with him and fend for herself when she leaves. She’s still young she can find another rich guy to marry but I think she will have to sign another ungenerous prenup.

I'll agree that she should have figured out that a wealthy guy who's divorced from the mother of his first set of children and had a baby with another woman but didn't marry her was very likely a poor choice for a husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does she have oriole posting for her here? I can’t insgine anyone defending her.

It seems so. Either her herself or someone hired to do so. Because nobody in real life gives a darn about a random menopausal gold digger and her crocodile tears. You lived it up for 20 years with an A lister. Hope you had fun. Welcome back to reality.

[Anonymous]

She’s still super rich because she will likely basically force the kids to give her a big cut of their nine figure inheritance. I’ve seen similar happen when a best friend’s grandpa cut out his mom. The best friend and her two siblings ended up giving their mom a free house and like a million dollars.

[Anonymous]

I feel bad for her and think she was duped into thinking this was a real marriage. Normal people are not married for almost 29 years and have no home with their name on it. It is like she was a girlfriend who birthed kids. He is so gross. I feel like he has someone posting for him because he is a pathetic excuse for a man.

[Anonymous]

20 years and five dating before

[Anonymous]

So how does he only pay 63K/month for three kids and Kelly Clarkson pays 200k/month for two kids the dad barely sees?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So how does he only pay 63K/month for three kids and Kelly Clarkson pays 200k/month for two kids the dad barely sees?

She pays less in child support. She’s also paying alimony until next year (per their prenup).

“Clarkson has agreed to pay Blackstock spousal support totaling $115,000 per month until January 31, 2024, with the exception that those payments would end should Blackstock remarry before that date, or if either party dies prior to it. The talk show host will also have to pay her ex $45,601 per month in child support. Both the spousal and child support payments were to begin on Feb. 1, 2022.”

https://www.altshulerlaw.com/blog/kelly-clarkson-ordered-to-pay-child-support-in-divorce-from-brandon-blackstock/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So how does he only pay 63K/month for three kids and Kelly Clarkson pays 200k/month for two kids the dad barely sees?

Kelly wasn't trying to be a miser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does he only pay 63K/month for three kids and Kelly Clarkson pays 200k/month for two kids the dad barely sees?

Kelly wasn't trying to be a miser.

I’m betting had she not gone the public route and dragged this out, he would have been more generous than the pre up required.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for her and think she was duped into thinking this was a real marriage. Normal people are not married for almost 29 years and have no home with their name on it. It is like she was a girlfriend who birthed kids. He is so gross. I feel like he has someone posting for him because he is a pathetic excuse for a man.

They are both a piece of work. The prenup is absurd but so is all this stuff she is arguing. The equitable solution is somewhere in the middle, but I think $1.5M is ridiculous. I’ve get more than that if my husband of 20 years and I divorced (because I’d get half) and we aren’t rich and famous.

[Anonymous]

Do you have a prenup? What are the terms? Are you the first or second wife?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is interesting that so many define a 'good man' and one who treats a woman well by how much money he gives. He is boiled down to nothing more than a wallet.

What to you then makes one a good woman and who who treats a man well? What does Chrsitine have to do to earn that distinction?

Is she bad and not treating him well if she doesn't keep cooking him dinner? Having sex? What does a wife need to do to be a good woman and to treat her husband well?
People are very clear on this thread that for men, their worth is based on $$ and what defines a good man is how much he has and gives to the woman, but what defines a good woman?

In the Kelly Clarkson divorce thread with a similar prenup - I don't really recall comment about how she is only a good woman and only treats her husband well if she gives him a lot more of her money. No one was calling her names and putting her down for not opening up the bank and ensuring her ex (and children when with him) had the same lifestyle as he had while married to her. It seems few feel that women are defined by $$ and how generous they are to an ex - so what would have made Kelly a good woman who treated her man well?

+1

He actually called her a good mother and also kept the house beautiful on the stand so that point is blown. A good man is protective of his wife and the idea that they were married almost 20 years and her name is on zero including apparently a car before she put her foot down and bought a car is just nuts.

He already owned multiple houses.