new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Sterling professional reputation.
Maybe until he allowed someone to buy him.
And then lied to Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

He doesn't seem like a rapist to me. This to me sounds more like somebody who wanted to publically humiliate others. He always seemed to do this crap with an audience. Do we really want somebody who enjoys humiliating others in the Supreme Court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

Eh. I wasn't really that interested in Ford, one way or the other. I was interested in Kavanaugh's more recent professional past and his behavior during the hearings.

Didn't pass muster, any of it. Which Republicans all knew and didn't care about. And they had their pick, could have put forward anyone. Insulting that they picked him and stuck with him. They deserve to lose the Senate for it.

Genuine question - what recent professional acts do you feel did not pass muster? I was under the impression he had a pretty spotless record.

He ran up 6 figure debts which were magically erased concurrent with his nomination and it was not disclosed on his financial filings.

That was just last year.

Yes, why was this not investigated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

So true. All I wanted was a thorough investigation before putting someone in a lifetime SCOTUS seat. I hope they impeach him and that all the GOP are voted out, starting with Susan so concerned collins

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

Gorsuch did not have this problem because he was highly qualified and exemplary.

[Anonymous]

NY Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, have a forthcoming book titled The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation.

Book will expose those who weren't interviewed by FBI..

https://www.thecut.com/2018/10/fbi-report-interview-kavanaugh-classmates.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

He literally couldn’t keep it in his pants. This is 100% on the dirtbag with his pants unzipped.

Well... if you believe a 30+ year old allegation by a guy who may or may not have witnessed this. Obviously, you do. I’m extremely skeptical it happened at all.
-DP

We know. We know you never believe any woman. There’s never a woman who you believe no matter how small or how big the charge (unless she accused a Democrat - suddenly you guys are convinced, curiously. But I have them suspicion that you don’t really believe those women, you just hate Democrats). Even when you’re women and you’ve had gropes, crude remarks and rapes of your own. Your POV is patriarchy and misogyny wrapped up in sadistic little package meant to look reasonable.

Stop your obsession with misogyny and patriarchy. All women do not have photography memories. Women do not always recall events of decades ago clearly. Women are not always motivated by your interpretation of noble causes. Just as Ford and Katz were motivated to save Roe v Wade by keeping Kavanaugh off SCOTUS, the NYT has an interest in garnering publicity for a book authored by a female reporter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

I will take your bet of a half dozen rapes. Let’s say $5,000 to Doctors Without Borders if you tell me who Kavanaugh raped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

Gorsuch did not have this problem because he was highly qualified and exemplary.

+1.

First, for those of you who don’t read, they are actually discussing two instances of exposing himself to women. Ramirez and Stier. Neither were investigated because the FBI was told not.

Second, do none of you ask yourself why Beer Boy has all these allegations against him and Gorsuch has none? Same president. Same Senate. Similar backgrounds and judicial philosophies. Could it be that Gorsuch can keep it in his pants and Beer Boy can’t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

+1
+1
+1
+1
+1

He’s a criminal and should be facing disbarment.

Ha! Because an activist trying to destroy him makes a completely unsubstantiated allegation? I don't think you understand the concept of justice.

I saw you murder that guy. Murderer! You should be executed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

You must be 17. One word: Bork.

[Anonymous]

No matter what he did in his past, his demeanor and answers during the questioning were very sub par. Embarrassing really. They could have picked way better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

You must be 17. One word: Bork.

Bork had hearings.
Bork had a vote.

Garland had neither. Unprecedented.

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh and his family will live with these eruptions for the rest of his life. I am sure his wife and daughters are so proud.