new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

We are neither regressive nor okay with sexual violence.

In fact, we abhor sexual violence so much that we don't want the fight against it to be set back by women like Ford and Swetnick who make vague and flimsy accusations, thereby throwing into question the veracity of women reporting real sexual violence.

Brava , PP

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

For the millionth time: what sexual violence are you referring to?

Brett Kavanaugh attempting to rape Christine Blasey Ford.

Insufficient evidence of that per Sen.Collins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

We are neither regressive nor okay with sexual violence.

In fact, we abhor sexual violence so much that we don't want the fight against it to be set back by women like Ford and Swetnick who make vague and flimsy accusations, thereby throwing into question the veracity of women reporting real sexual violence.

If you’re a GOP voter and a Brett supporter, you are regressive.

Blasey Ford’s accusation wasn’t vague or flimsy at all, it’s absolutely in line with what experts in the field say people recall. I think there are about three of you boosters still posting in here and statistically, at least one of you has been sexually assaulted. I’m sure you remember with perfect clarity certain parts - what happened, for example - even as other parts your brain didn’t find it necessary to save. It doesn’t make your assault any less real because your brain didn't produce a journalistic account.

Do you recall the names of the experts in the field who testified on behalf of Ford?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

We are neither regressive nor okay with sexual violence.

In fact, we abhor sexual violence so much that we don't want the fight against it to be set back by women like Ford and Swetnick who make vague and flimsy accusations, thereby throwing into question the veracity of women reporting real sexual violence.

Brava , PP

+1

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

For the millionth time: what sexual violence are you referring to?

Brett Kavanaugh attempting to rape Christine Blasey Ford.

Insufficient evidence of that per Sen.Collins.

It would have been great if the FBI had actually been allowed to investigate fully. Don’t you agree that it’s odd that the White House spiked the investigation and that Susie went along with this? I mean, I just think it’s odd that she would say there was insufficient evidence when in fact the evidence gathering was stopped. That’s odd to me. It’s also odd to me that Bretty would go along with that, right? I mean if you know you’re innocent and that for sure your best friend, who was named by the alleged victim (and odd person to choose if you’re making it up!) as a witness, you’d say “oh my goodness! I’m a good man and I’ve never done anything like this ever, I respect women! Please, do this investigation thoroughly and completely so that I may clear my name!” You know, like Senator Al Franken did when he was falsely accused.

But Bretty didn’t do that. He let Donald spike the investigation as though he knew there possibly were something to find, even if he was too drunk at the time to remember it clearly. His victim wasn’t drunk. She remembers. She remembers him trying to get off her clothing. She remembers the boys laughing.

[Anonymous]

13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

This must make you nuttier than a fruitcake .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, PP, many people are still outraged by Kav's purchased seat.

What don't you get?

They thought we’d fall in line.

We saw what he was like. We saw what the GOP finds acceptable. And we see that regressive women are perfectly okay with sexual violence.

For the millionth time: what sexual violence are you referring to?

Brett Kavanaugh attempting to rape Christine Blasey Ford.

Insufficient evidence of that per Sen.Collins.

It would have been great if the FBI had actually been allowed to investigate fully. Don’t you agree that it’s odd that the White House spiked the investigation and that Susie went along with this? I mean, I just think it’s odd that she would say there was insufficient evidence when in fact the evidence gathering was stopped. That’s odd to me. It’s also odd to me that Bretty would go along with that, right? I mean if you know you’re innocent and that for sure your best friend, who was named by the alleged victim (and odd person to choose if you’re making it up!) as a witness, you’d say “oh my goodness! I’m a good man and I’ve never done anything like this ever, I respect women! Please, do this investigation thoroughly and completely so that I may clear my name!” You know, like Senator Al Franken did when he was falsely accused.

But Bretty didn’t do that. He let Donald spike the investigation as though he knew there possibly were something to find, even if he was too drunk at the time to remember it clearly. His victim wasn’t drunk. She remembers. She remembers him trying to get off her clothing. She remembers the boys laughing.

And, she remembers, when she got to the top of the stairs, being pushed from behind into a bedroom, yet didn't see who pushed her? Did they follow her up the stairs? She remembers MJ jumping on the bed such that they "toppled over". Must have been a really high ceiling for a high schooler to jump on the bed high enough for them to topple over.

[Anonymous]

You people defending him and then accusing Ford of setting women back are scum.

[Anonymous]

Agree, PP.

People defending him are garbage and frightened of what may come out in their own lives.

[Anonymous]

I'm just a little surprised that the left hasn't accused him of being a Russian asset yet.
That seems to be the current political attack against anyone they don't like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

This must make you nuttier than a fruitcake .

He’s never served as a judge. Ever. Not even for traffic court at the municipal courthouse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

This must make you nuttier than a fruitcake .

He’s never served as a judge. Ever. Not even for traffic court at the municipal courthouse.

Kagan is on the Supreme Court.
When was she a judge before that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

This must make you nuttier than a fruitcake .

He’s never served as a judge. Ever. Not even for traffic court at the municipal courthouse.

?
"Before taking his seat on the highest court, Kavanaugh spent about a decade as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, often called “the little Supreme Court” because it handles crucial cases related to federal agencies and because many of its members get elevated to the real Supreme Court."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/11/trump-nominates-rao-replace-kavanaugh-dc-court/576535/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:39 again. https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1184913638563471360

And here is the kind of person who smears Blasey Ford and supports Bretty. The kind of unqualified hack that the GOP loves. The kind of person who is willing to lie and lie in service to their cause.

This must make you nuttier than a fruitcake .

He’s never served as a judge. Ever. Not even for traffic court at the municipal courthouse.

^^
Yet another example of a liberal stating a blatant lie as "truth."