new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country?

Evangelicals are much higher than 8%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country?

Does your post make sense to you? Do you understand that justices are supposed to be beyond any conflict of interest? And here’s Bretty (and Scalia) just rubbing our noses in it that they’re nothing but conflicts of interest. It seems just the GOP justices have this problem as Thomas never mentions his conflicts of interest, nor does he recuse.

In any event, this is more evidence that bretty is indeed unsuitable for the task.

[Anonymous]

Alito not Scalia.
Honestly, I can’t imagine Scalia pulling that kind of sh#t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country?

Does your post make sense to you? Do you understand that justices are supposed to be beyond any conflict of interest? And here’s Bretty (and Scalia) just rubbing our noses in it that they’re nothing but conflicts of interest. It seems just the GOP justices have this problem as Thomas never mentions his conflicts of interest, nor does he recuse.

In any event, this is more evidence that bretty is indeed unsuitable for the task.

So when Ruth Bader Ginsburg meets with liberals there is no conflict of interest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449

Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.

Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country?

Does your post make sense to you? Do you understand that justices are supposed to be beyond any conflict of interest? And here’s Bretty (and Scalia) just rubbing our noses in it that they’re nothing but conflicts of interest. It seems just the GOP justices have this problem as Thomas never mentions his conflicts of interest, nor does he recuse.

In any event, this is more evidence that bretty is indeed unsuitable for the task.

They all do it. Kagan gave a speech at the University of Colorado, who had filed a brief in regards to a pending DACA case before the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Alito not Scalia.
Honestly, I can’t imagine Scalia pulling that kind of sh#t.

Ha. That’s what I get for mentally referring to him as “Scalito” for so long.