Getting into top 20 college is nearly impossible without

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I want to debunk this so hard because I've written about this before, but I have a DD at Stanford and she's about as normal as they come. People were shocked when she got in, her counselor told her she had a snow ball's chance in hell and almost refused to do the damn paperwork for the application, but they were wrong and so are a lot of you.

DD was a good student with a decent, but not crazy GPA. Her SAT scores were good, but seriously in line with plenty of people's who were rejected based on her schools scattercram. She's was basically around the in-pool for UVA. She did zero extra-circulars. And I mean, zero.

Her interest was shopping, fashion, and make up. She was a crazy online shopper, she had a website about make-up and fashion, she worked at a make up store, was crazy about the beauty industry and online shopping. She had an interest in STEM and talked about ideas she wanted to pursue and why she thought her view and perspective was different. She wrote her essay about merchandising, consumer trends, and how stores and websites drive people to choose certain things. It's basically what led her to studying a STEM based program and working at a large online retailer last summer. She wasn't hooked.

I do think there's an element of randomness, but I also think a compelling story and interest tied can sometimes make someone stand out.


You're pretty much agreeing with the OP. Having your own website and being so knowledgeable in a certain are like that is exactly the kind of talent the OP was talking about.


I agree, What is described above is the 'hook'. It really is not that difficult. To get your kid into top schools:
1. Athlete - girls should go into rowing due to title 9
2.URM - go through your family tree
3. Rich parents or grandparents
4. Famous relatives
5. Interesting activity started since freshman
Anonymous
Specifically for HYPSM you need top notch academics and at least one other thing that is really impressive/memorable.

For the non-HYPSM ivies and other top 10 schools you can maybe get away with just (lol) top notch academics and good but not insanely impressive ECs.

As you go even further down to places like Emory, Vanderbilt, Rice, WUSTL, Gtown, ND etc, the bar is a bit lower, and usually if your scores are very good they might overlook a GPA or ECs that are less than amazing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Specifically for HYPSM you need top notch academics and at least one other thing that is really impressive/memorable.

For the non-HYPSM ivies and other top 10 schools you can maybe get away with just (lol) top notch academics and good but not insanely impressive ECs.

As you go even further down to places like Emory, Vanderbilt, Rice, WUSTL, Gtown, ND etc, the bar is a bit lower, and usually if your scores are very good they might overlook a GPA or ECs that are less than amazing.


Nah, you need something really impressive/memorable at Penn and Columbia, too. Nobody overlooks GPA, not at Emory or Vanderbilt, and in fact high scores with low GPA can signal you're a slacker.
Anonymous
I disagree with OP. My perfect scorer with perfect GPA class of 2021 kid was accepted into three of the top 5 schools. A well rounded kid with no special ECs does get in. What my kid did have was a one and done perfect score and good social skills that came across on the application. The top schools want to see your full testing history and they are not impressed if it takes a student 3 tries to get a 36 or 1600. They're also not interested in kids who are just going to sit in the library rather they want kids who will participate in the school community.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Specifically for HYPSM you need top notch academics and at least one other thing that is really impressive/memorable.

For the non-HYPSM ivies and other top 10 schools you can maybe get away with just (lol) top notch academics and good but not insanely impressive ECs.

As you go even further down to places like Emory, Vanderbilt, Rice, WUSTL, Gtown, ND etc, the bar is a bit lower, and usually if your scores are very good they might overlook a GPA or ECs that are less than amazing.


Nah, you need something really impressive/memorable at Penn and Columbia, too. Nobody overlooks GPA, not at Emory or Vanderbilt, and in fact high scores with low GPA can signal you're a slacker.


Vanderbilt is actually known for giving a huge emphasis on SATs at the expense of everything else in order to keep its USNews ranking. Also we are not talking about bad GPAs, just GPAs in the 3.6-3.8 region which is clearly below what the majority of people in the ivy+ schools have (most top 15 schools have GPA averages of 3.9+)
Anonymous
Either explain your acronyms or stop using them
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I work in secondary education. I know a white girl who got into an Ivy for soccer the summer after 9th grade. She's no genius. I also have a black football player who has offers from a few Ivies and he's a nice kid, but a legit idiot.


Wait, how is this new info?

To the OP, someone actually does get in. URM, athlete, legacy are hooks we would all LOVE to have.



I just wonder where a top Ivy can hide dummy athletes? I don't think any Ivies have remedial coursework like public Us offer. And a football player at an Ivy isn't leaving early to go pro, they have to hide these kids in classes for the full 4 years.

And the 9th grader getting into an Ivy two years before coach or admissions sees her SAT? Explain THAT.


Ugh, I've been to Ivies and Ivy-similar schools, and they don't really bother to hide the dummies. Everyone knows who they are. And, yes, they are lowering their standards for athletes and kids whose parents give a lot of money. One of the saddest situations I saw was at a top Ivy, and a girl whose father was very rich and not a celebrity himself, but very connected within the celebrity world .... this woman was dumb as rocks and stood out like a sore thumb. People made fun of her behind her back, and I assumed they were just being jerks. Then I had to work with her on an assignment, and realized that, while they were being jerks, they were also correct about her capabilities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I work in secondary education. I know a white girl who got into an Ivy for soccer the summer after 9th grade. She's no genius. I also have a black football player who has offers from a few Ivies and he's a nice kid, but a legit idiot.


Wait, how is this new info?

To the OP, someone actually does get in. URM, athlete, legacy are hooks we would all LOVE to have.



I just wonder where a top Ivy can hide dummy athletes? I don't think any Ivies have remedial coursework like public Us offer. And a football player at an Ivy isn't leaving early to go pro, they have to hide these kids in classes for the full 4 years.

And the 9th grader getting into an Ivy two years before coach or admissions sees her SAT? Explain THAT.


Fact: Harvard and the Ivies recruit athletes as early as the 9th grade:

http://www.gocrimson.com/information/recruiting/helpfulinfo
http://www.gocrimson.com/General/Core_Values/20151007


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they're a URM, they're a shoo-in, even without great grades.


This is wrong.

Harvard admitted 2,056 applicants this year - of those admitted, 14.6 percent were African-American. That's 300 students. 300 African-Americans in the entire US of A were admitted by Harvard last year.

How many of them were recruited athletes? According to the NY Times, HYP admit about 200 recruited athletes over 35 sports each year. Let's guess that 20 percent of those athletes are African-American - that's 40 students. So now we're down to 260 African-American students who were admitted to Harvard last year. How many of them are legacy kids? The Crimson reported that 30 percent of the Class of 2021 were legacy students. If the African-American legacy enrollment rate is even only half that of the entire Class, that would be another 39 kids.

At that point, you're looking at 221 African-Americans admitted who are neither athletes nor legacy. Hardly a shoo-in.

What I have seen, as others have mentioned, is that to get into HYP you have to have impeccable credentials, and then something extra. For African-Americans, that something extra is their URM status - but only if they're in that 4.0, 1550, strong extracurricular category. For others, that something extra might be a national award, or whatever. And if you have the impeccable everything, but not the something extra, then you end up at Duke or Brown or Penn.





There might not be 300 URM kids in the US that have those stats. Only a couple of hundred AA kids each year score above 750 on either section, you would need both above that. I looked at ACT scores for AA kids a few years back and there were 31 AA kids who scored 35 and above on the ACT. Good but not great credentials will get an AA kid into an Ivy League school.


There are also many white kids that get into HYP with scores of 32-33. The only population that would be majority 35 and above is Asian.


From Naviance data I can tell you that this is not remotely true. Without a 34+ you don't have a prayer.


I can't stand it when people spew misinformation. From our school's Naviance it tells you the low average and high ACT score for students admitted across the country. Here is the breakdown of the average score:

ACT scores national average (according to Naviance):

Harvard - 33
Yale - 33
Princeton - 33
Stanford - 32
Brown - 31

Naviance also gives you the low, average and high scores across the middle 50%. You don't have to pay attention to the BS people say on here. If your kid has scores in the middle 50% and has a distinct passion and something to say, they should apply.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I work in secondary education. I know a white girl who got into an Ivy for soccer the summer after 9th grade. She's no genius. I also have a black football player who has offers from a few Ivies and he's a nice kid, but a legit idiot.


Wait, how is this new info?

To the OP, someone actually does get in. URM, athlete, legacy are hooks we would all LOVE to have.



I just wonder where a top Ivy can hide dummy athletes? I don't think any Ivies have remedial coursework like public Us offer. And a football player at an Ivy isn't leaving early to go pro, they have to hide these kids in classes for the full 4 years.

And the 9th grader getting into an Ivy two years before coach or admissions sees her SAT? Explain THAT.


Fact: Harvard and the Ivies recruit athletes as early as the 9th grade:

http://www.gocrimson.com/information/recruiting/helpfulinfo
http://www.gocrimson.com/General/Core_Values/20151007




Absolutely, here's a lacrosse kid who committed to Princeton last year in the 9th grade https://twitter.com/tyxanders/status/779836582618664960?lang=en

and hockey player verbally committed to Harvard in 9th grade: http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/15-year-old-wunderkind-viral-video-star-oliver-wahlstrom-commits-to-harvard
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Specifically for HYPSM you need top notch academics and at least one other thing that is really impressive/memorable.

For the non-HYPSM ivies and other top 10 schools you can maybe get away with just (lol) top notch academics and good but not insanely impressive ECs.

As you go even further down to places like Emory, Vanderbilt, Rice, WUSTL, Gtown, ND etc, the bar is a bit lower, and usually if your scores are very good they might overlook a GPA or ECs that are less than amazing.


Nah, you need something really impressive/memorable at Penn and Columbia, too. Nobody overlooks GPA, not at Emory or Vanderbilt, and in fact high scores with low GPA can signal you're a slacker.


Vanderbilt is actually known for giving a huge emphasis on SATs at the expense of everything else in order to keep its USNews ranking. Also we are not talking about bad GPAs, just GPAs in the 3.6-3.8 region which is clearly below what the majority of people in the ivy+ schools have (most top 15 schools have GPA averages of 3.9+)


Most of the schools in the 10-20 range seem to care a lot more about both grades and SATs than the top 5. Those are where all the unhooked perfect scorers in the top 5 percent of the class end up at our HS (if they don't go to the State flagship or chase merit money). With rare exceptions, the kids who go to Harvard, Stanford, etc. have lower scores and grades (in some cases much lower), but either amazing ECs or hooks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:having an extreme talent in an area they need at that moment. Perfect scorers with perfect GPA will get rejected. Not only do you need to have an extreme talent, but you have to have provable achievements. 10, 000 hours of community service means nada. Your Scholastic awards mean nothing. Your MUN competitions mean almost nothing. Your state level Varsity sports could mean something, your state level Oboe could mean something, but your state level violin probably won't. Top scorers are a dime a dozen, you have to be top scorer PLUS supremely talented. Every year I tell this to parents and they don't believe me and they apply and their kid gets shut out. And they thank me for making them apply to some realistic schools (that they think they will never have to attend)…bc they got shut out of 7, accepted to the state safety they don't really like, but the other 2 schools they didn't think they would need…well, thank god bc that is where they end up. There are very few exceptions to these rules.


Or be black
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they're a URM, they're a shoo-in, even without great grades.


This is wrong.

Harvard admitted 2,056 applicants this year - of those admitted, 14.6 percent were African-American. That's 300 students. 300 African-Americans in the entire US of A were admitted by Harvard last year.

How many of them were recruited athletes? According to the NY Times, HYP admit about 200 recruited athletes over 35 sports each year. Let's guess that 20 percent of those athletes are African-American - that's 40 students. So now we're down to 260 African-American students who were admitted to Harvard last year. How many of them are legacy kids? The Crimson reported that 30 percent of the Class of 2021 were legacy students. If the African-American legacy enrollment rate is even only half that of the entire Class, that would be another 39 kids.

At that point, you're looking at 221 African-Americans admitted who are neither athletes nor legacy. Hardly a shoo-in.

What I have seen, as others have mentioned, is that to get into HYP you have to have impeccable credentials, and then something extra. For African-Americans, that something extra is their URM status - but only if they're in that 4.0, 1550, strong extracurricular category. For others, that something extra might be a national award, or whatever. And if you have the impeccable everything, but not the something extra, then you end up at Duke or Brown or Penn.





There might not be 300 URM kids in the US that have those stats. Only a couple of hundred AA kids each year score above 750 on either section, you would need both above that. I looked at ACT scores for AA kids a few years back and there were 31 AA kids who scored 35 and above on the ACT. Good but not great credentials will get an AA kid into an Ivy League school.


There are also many white kids that get into HYP with scores of 32-33. The only population that would be majority 35 and above is Asian.


From Naviance data I can tell you that this is not remotely true. Without a 34+ you don't have a prayer.


I can't stand it when people spew misinformation. From our school's Naviance it tells you the low average and high ACT score for students admitted across the country. Here is the breakdown of the average score:

ACT scores national average (according to Naviance):

Harvard - 33
Yale - 33
Princeton - 33
Stanford - 32
Brown - 31

Naviance also gives you the low, average and high scores across the middle 50%. You don't have to pay attention to the BS people say on here. If your kid has scores in the middle 50% and has a distinct passion and something to say, they should apply.


Our school, comprised of mostly highly educated families, also showed on Naviance that you need at least a 1500+ on the SAT to be admitted to the types of schools listed above. When we would point out an exception, the counselor would make it clear that was a special case, and not one that applied to our exceptional but not exceptional DS. Brown, for instance, shows on their website that they only admit 7% of applicants with less than a 33 ACT. So sure, apply with your 31 ACT to Brown, but realize you are likely wasting your time and far more likely to go to Bard than Brown. (The exception would be if you are in a school where a 31 is the highest score around -- most likely a school with a less affluent population, and yay for those kids). Time is short senior year, and it is better to have a realistic idea of what is possible and not spend too much time chasing the very unlikely.

Anonymous
LOL @ fake template websites (nobody visits). Also LOL @ "created an app!" (nobody ever downloaded or used).

The helicopter-parents / consultant-guided scams are so obvious.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:having an extreme talent in an area they need at that moment. Perfect scorers with perfect GPA will get rejected. Not only do you need to have an extreme talent, but you have to have provable achievements. 10, 000 hours of community service means nada. Your Scholastic awards mean nothing. Your MUN competitions mean almost nothing. Your state level Varsity sports could mean something, your state level Oboe could mean something, but your state level violin probably won't. Top scorers are a dime a dozen, you have to be top scorer PLUS supremely talented. Every year I tell this to parents and they don't believe me and they apply and their kid gets shut out. And they thank me for making them apply to some realistic schools (that they think they will never have to attend)…bc they got shut out of 7, accepted to the state safety they don't really like, but the other 2 schools they didn't think they would need…well, thank god bc that is where they end up. There are very few exceptions to these rules.


Or be black


Bigot
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: