No, you're wrong. You have the romanticized version of love/marriage. In reality, having kids is almost the ONLY real reason anyone needs to get married. Thinking that kids are an afterthought for getting married is dysfunctional. |
PP, it's interesting that you're projecting what you perceived as a deficiency of your marriage as a deficiency in your spouse rather than a deficiency in yourself. Many women with perfectly good husbands and marriage are exactly the same. There's nothing wrong with your husband. There's something wrong with you--you've never fully committed yourself emotionally to the marriage or to your husband. Once you decide to do that, things will get much better. Of course, you do have to grow up first. |
The kind of women who post on message boards complaining about the lack of passion in their marriages and invariably put all the blame for it on their husbands are probably in the majority, but not necessarily representative of the overall population of married women. I imagine the non-psychos probably aren't compulsively posting on message boards about how unhappy their marriages are (but it's never their own fault of course LOL) and are probably more numerous than the psychos, but who can really tell? |
Or, more likely, all these women complaining that their husband isn't Prince Charming ain't exactly Cinderella either. They have unrealistic expectations on what they can expect to get as a husband. It's an entitlement mentality--it's up to the husband to "make me happy," and if "I'm not happy" it must be because there's something wrong with my husband, it couldn't possibly be because I am a psychologically disturbed loon. |
As a son of a mother, I really feel sorry for your son. Your patronizing condescension has undoubtedly totally emasculated the poor lad. |
The sexual part can be fixed. How much effort can you honestly say that you, personally, have ever actually put into trying to have a better sex life? If you are like most women, the answer is "zero." |
Yes, it's sad that your mother's nutty. |
One and a half |
PP here. I think you are (mostly ) quite right. There is nothing wrong with DH (I don't think I said there was, actually). And yes, I've never fully committed myself emotionally to this marriage or person. I think you've it it spot on. All of the weakness in the relationship is due to me. Sometimes DCUM is amazing in it's understanding from just a few paragraphs. |
|
The thing is, love changes over time for many people. It did for me. I had that giddy excited passion for my husband when I married him. 17 years later? We have deep comfort, security, and intimacy. He is my best friend and life partner. We still enjoy sex together once or twice a week. We still have passionate debates about current events, etc. We're not that couple you see sitting at a restaurant with nothing to say to each other. We have a very happy marriage and family. But I wouldn't say I long to touch him like I used to. I used to not be able to keep my hands off him. That has faded over time.
So does this mean we're not "in love" after 17 years of marriage? I don't know. It depends on how you define it I guess. |