DOGE staffer wrecked in DC, Trump threatening to federalize DC

[Anonymous]

So many disgusting people on this thread.

“DC kids”
“the community”
Etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Surely someone on Swann street has security cameras

Police will also have body cams. There's likely a ton of footage of the incident and the aftermath (ie., large group of teens arriving and fleeing).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems staged.

So a wealthy 19 year old is out on U street at 3am with his girlfriend, and is carjacked by teens.

Does he live in U street? Why not take an Uber at 3am, especially if he was probably imbibing something. Bars close at 2am so what were they doing the last hour? What kind of car was he parking on Swann Street on a Saturday night?

If not staged a very odd series of choices. But now we know he didn’t come to the rescue of a random woman, but he was the one being car jacked with his gf in tow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The number of attackers is not known. Witnesses (Big Balls and his girlfriend) said ten, which is why it was in the police report. This has not been verified and is not in the official MPD press release on the incident. Only two attackers were arrested, two 15 yr olds (one male and one female, both from Hyattsville).

Here is the MPD's statement:

https://mpdc.dc.gov/release/mpd-makes-two-arrests-swann-street-attempted-carjacking

That is not true. The police report said officers observed approximately 10 attackers.

Again, not verified. People often do a bad job of estimating things like this (the number of gunshots, the number of people present, etc.). Yes, even cops. The ultimately arrested two people. We have know idea if the other people present were attackers or onlookers at this point, and the fact that they scattered when the cops showed up is not evidence of guilt, but is to be expected.

I have seen wild speculation about the number of attackers and the nature of the attack on Twitter and would just caution people to wait and see how it unfolds. You weren't there, you don't know.

The police stated # of attackers was 10, dummy.

Wrong. Teen boy and girl were arrested.

Not wrong, read the police report. While the police were only able to arrest two, there were others there who fled quickly. About 10 in all, according to the police. Again, read the police report before commenting.

DP. The police report is vague. It states that cops saw "approximately" ten people standing around a car "and attacking" the victims. This is a vague statement. Were all ten people attacking? Were some just standing there? Were some yelling? What were they yelling (were they egging the attackers on or were they upset? We don't know, and it's actually possible the cops don't even know. They saw a group of kids, some of them were clearly attacking this guy, most of them fled when the cops showed up, and two were arrested and IDed by the victims as attackers. The police report was drafted without any investigation, just a brief ID and statement from the victims.

We don't actually know what happened.

Good grief. You people will make excuses for anything.
It was not vague when it said "a group of approximately ten juveniles surrounding the complainants' vehicle and assaulting C-1."
It did not say "approximately two people." It did not say "approximately five people." And it did not say "only two individuals were assaulting C-1."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems staged.

So a wealthy 19 year old is out on U street at 3am with his girlfriend, and is carjacked by teens.

Does he live in U street? Why not take an Uber at 3am, especially if he was probably imbibing something. Bars close at 2am so what were they doing the last hour? What kind of car was he parking on Swann Street on a Saturday night?

If not staged a very odd series of choices. But now we know he didn’t come to the rescue of a random woman, but he was the one being car jacked with his gf in tow.

It astounds me how many people here are ok with victim blaming. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s hard to fault MOD here. They were policing on the scene and responded immediately.
I’m not really sure what the solution is for these juvenile crimes. Are other big cities trying 15 year olds as adults for these things? I just don’t know. I agree some of these teens seem to act with impunity and are apparently sociopathic.

Yes. While we may say that a 15 year old brain is not fully developed, a 15 year old who is not mentally deficient absolutely knows right from wrong.
These teens know their records will be wiped clean when they reach a given age. That practice should absolutely be halted.

It's not about knowing right from wrong -- it's about impulse control and understanding that the future will actually arrive, knowing how to plan ahead etc. To treat a 15 year old as an adult because of the severity of their crime is just insanity. We are better -- and smarter -- than that. Throw all the therapy we can at them while incarcerated and raise the age of release to 24. But don't treat them like adults. THAT is criminal.

It is precisely this attitude that emboldens these punks to continue to prey on others. They know there will be no consequences.
These 15 year old will grow up to be 30 year olds still committing crimes and having no remorse.

[Anonymous]

Typical DCUM failure to have empathy because his man has politics that are disagreeable.

“I guess he’s little balls now!!!” — because he was jumped by 10 DC Teens. Meanwhile in the past few years, DC teens have committed multiple murders including the Uber driver in Navy Yard (Mohammed Anwar) who was carjacked and killed, and the DJ in Shaw (Bryan Smith) who was beaten to death. None of these teens have ever been sentenced to anything beyond being held until 21 for committing murder. Yet somehow in your liberal mind because you don’t like this man he is “little balls” aka a coward for, what? Not beating up the 10 DC teens who are potential murderers?

“I don’t believe this happened” — yet you same people call everyone who questions official Democratic Party narratives a “conspiracy theorist”.

You people are insufferable and I am frankly happy to see DC potentially be federalized. Lastly, you lost the national election because you are a unlikable group of people outside of your bubble — just keep that in mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Typical DCUM failure to have empathy because his man has politics that are disagreeable.

“I guess he’s little balls now!!!” — because he was jumped by 10 DC Teens. Meanwhile in the past few years, DC teens have committed multiple murders including the Uber driver in Navy Yard (Mohammed Anwar) who was carjacked and killed, and the DJ in Shaw (Bryan Smith) who was beaten to death. None of these teens have ever been sentenced to anything beyond being held until 21 for committing murder. Yet somehow in your liberal mind because you don’t like this man he is “little balls” aka a coward for, what? Not beating up the 10 DC teens who are potential murderers?

“I don’t believe this happened” — yet you same people call everyone who questions official Democratic Party narratives a “conspiracy theorist”.

You people are insufferable and I am frankly happy to see DC potentially be federalized. Lastly, you lost the national election because you are a unlikable group of people outside of your bubble — just keep that in mind.

+ a million
They sit back in their cushy homes or places of work and demonize the people who are trying to prevent crime while all along excusing those committing crime. Likely because they think they are immune to the crimes being committed. It is no wonder DC is a mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The number of attackers is not known. Witnesses (Big Balls and his girlfriend) said ten, which is why it was in the police report. This has not been verified and is not in the official MPD press release on the incident. Only two attackers were arrested, two 15 yr olds (one male and one female, both from Hyattsville).

Here is the MPD's statement:

https://mpdc.dc.gov/release/mpd-makes-two-arrests-swann-street-attempted-carjacking

That is not true. The police report said officers observed approximately 10 attackers.

Again, not verified. People often do a bad job of estimating things like this (the number of gunshots, the number of people present, etc.). Yes, even cops. The ultimately arrested two people. We have know idea if the other people present were attackers or onlookers at this point, and the fact that they scattered when the cops showed up is not evidence of guilt, but is to be expected.

I have seen wild speculation about the number of attackers and the nature of the attack on Twitter and would just caution people to wait and see how it unfolds. You weren't there, you don't know.

The police stated # of attackers was 10, dummy.

Wrong. Teen boy and girl were arrested.

Not wrong, read the police report. While the police were only able to arrest two, there were others there who fled quickly. About 10 in all, according to the police. Again, read the police report before commenting.

DP. The police report is vague. It states that cops saw "approximately" ten people standing around a car "and attacking" the victims. This is a vague statement. Were all ten people attacking? Were some just standing there? Were some yelling? What were they yelling (were they egging the attackers on or were they upset? We don't know, and it's actually possible the cops don't even know. They saw a group of kids, some of them were clearly attacking this guy, most of them fled when the cops showed up, and two were arrested and IDed by the victims as attackers. The police report was drafted without any investigation, just a brief ID and statement from the victims.

We don't actually know what happened.

Good grief. You people will make excuses for anything.
It was not vague when it said "a group of approximately ten juveniles surrounding the complainants' vehicle and assaulting C-1."
It did not say "approximately two people." It did not say "approximately five people." And it did not say "only two individuals were assaulting C-1."

PP here and I'm not making excuses. I'm a lawyer. This is a crime, and at present, there are exactly two suspects and no hunt for additional assailants, only witnesses.

Some of you also don't seem to understand that a police report is a first draft, and this one is particularly short and vague.

Obviously Big Balls (good grief that name) was attacked and he has identified two people as his attackers. Those two people have been arrested. There were a number of other teens present and they fled when the cops arrived, but we do not currently know if they participated in the attack or not. Ideally we will find out. If at some point the MPD releases a statement that it is looking for additional assailants as identified by the victims or the two suspects, or that they have video footage of additional people attacking the victims, I will agree that there were however many number of attackers.

As of right now, we know there were two and that there were additional teens present. That's all we know. Some of us live in the land of fact and what can be proven, instead of the land of what is most fun to talk out of our a$$es about on Twitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Typical DCUM failure to have empathy because his man has politics that are disagreeable.

“I guess he’s little balls now!!!” — because he was jumped by 10 DC Teens. Meanwhile in the past few years, DC teens have committed multiple murders including the Uber driver in Navy Yard (Mohammed Anwar) who was carjacked and killed, and the DJ in Shaw (Bryan Smith) who was beaten to death. None of these teens have ever been sentenced to anything beyond being held until 21 for committing murder. Yet somehow in your liberal mind because you don’t like this man he is “little balls” aka a coward for, what? Not beating up the 10 DC teens who are potential murderers?

“I don’t believe this happened” — yet you same people call everyone who questions official Democratic Party narratives a “conspiracy theorist”.

You people are insufferable and I am frankly happy to see DC potentially be federalized. Lastly, you lost the national election because you are a unlikable group of people outside of your bubble — just keep that in mind.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems staged.

So a wealthy 19 year old is out on U street at 3am with his girlfriend, and is carjacked by teens.

Does he live in U street? Why not take an Uber at 3am, especially if he was probably imbibing something. Bars close at 2am so what were they doing the last hour? What kind of car was he parking on Swann Street on a Saturday night?

If not staged a very odd series of choices. But now we know he didn’t come to the rescue of a random woman, but he was the one being car jacked with his gf in tow.

It astounds me how many people here are ok with victim blaming. Pathetic.

This is a city. Act accordingly. It’s a series of bad choices, which is culminating in a President looking to Federalize our city. It sure is odd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The number of attackers is not known. Witnesses (Big Balls and his girlfriend) said ten, which is why it was in the police report. This has not been verified and is not in the official MPD press release on the incident. Only two attackers were arrested, two 15 yr olds (one male and one female, both from Hyattsville).

Here is the MPD's statement:

https://mpdc.dc.gov/release/mpd-makes-two-arrests-swann-street-attempted-carjacking

That is not true. The police report said officers observed approximately 10 attackers.

Again, not verified. People often do a bad job of estimating things like this (the number of gunshots, the number of people present, etc.). Yes, even cops. The ultimately arrested two people. We have know idea if the other people present were attackers or onlookers at this point, and the fact that they scattered when the cops showed up is not evidence of guilt, but is to be expected.

I have seen wild speculation about the number of attackers and the nature of the attack on Twitter and would just caution people to wait and see how it unfolds. You weren't there, you don't know.

The police stated # of attackers was 10, dummy.

Wrong. Teen boy and girl were arrested.

Not wrong, read the police report. While the police were only able to arrest two, there were others there who fled quickly. About 10 in all, according to the police. Again, read the police report before commenting.

DP. The police report is vague. It states that cops saw "approximately" ten people standing around a car "and attacking" the victims. This is a vague statement. Were all ten people attacking? Were some just standing there? Were some yelling? What were they yelling (were they egging the attackers on or were they upset? We don't know, and it's actually possible the cops don't even know. They saw a group of kids, some of them were clearly attacking this guy, most of them fled when the cops showed up, and two were arrested and IDed by the victims as attackers. The police report was drafted without any investigation, just a brief ID and statement from the victims.

We don't actually know what happened.

Good grief. You people will make excuses for anything.
It was not vague when it said "a group of approximately ten juveniles surrounding the complainants' vehicle and assaulting C-1."
It did not say "approximately two people." It did not say "approximately five people." And it did not say "only two individuals were assaulting C-1."

PP here and I'm not making excuses. I'm a lawyer. This is a crime, and at present, there are exactly two suspects and no hunt for additional assailants, only witnesses.

Some of you also don't seem to understand that a police report is a first draft, and this one is particularly short and vague.

Obviously Big Balls (good grief that name) was attacked and he has identified two people as his attackers. Those two people have been arrested. There were a number of other teens present and they fled when the cops arrived, but we do not currently know if they participated in the attack or not. Ideally we will find out. If at some point the MPD releases a statement that it is looking for additional assailants as identified by the victims or the two suspects, or that they have video footage of additional people attacking the victims, I will agree that there were however many number of attackers.

As of right now, we know there were two and that there were additional teens present. That's all we know. Some of us live in the land of fact and what can be proven, instead of the land of what is most fun to talk out of our a$$es about on Twitter.

Oh I see MAGA live in car dependent suburbs, so they don’t appreciate how this is a “ Play stupid games, win stupid prizes”. And he’s 19, he can’t even go to bars. Does he live on U Street? Make it make sense.

[Anonymous]

Karma

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems staged.

So a wealthy 19 year old is out on U street at 3am with his girlfriend, and is carjacked by teens.

Does he live in U street? Why not take an Uber at 3am, especially if he was probably imbibing something. Bars close at 2am so what were they doing the last hour? What kind of car was he parking on Swann Street on a Saturday night?

If not staged a very odd series of choices. But now we know he didn’t come to the rescue of a random woman, but he was the one being car jacked with his gf in tow.

It astounds me how many people here are ok with victim blaming. Pathetic.

This is a city. Act accordingly. It’s a series of bad choices, which is culminating in a President looking to Federalize our city. It sure is odd.

Is that your response when an intoxicated woman is raped after a night out at the bars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The number of attackers is not known. Witnesses (Big Balls and his girlfriend) said ten, which is why it was in the police report. This has not been verified and is not in the official MPD press release on the incident. Only two attackers were arrested, two 15 yr olds (one male and one female, both from Hyattsville).

Here is the MPD's statement:

https://mpdc.dc.gov/release/mpd-makes-two-arrests-swann-street-attempted-carjacking

That is not true. The police report said officers observed approximately 10 attackers.

Again, not verified. People often do a bad job of estimating things like this (the number of gunshots, the number of people present, etc.). Yes, even cops. The ultimately arrested two people. We have know idea if the other people present were attackers or onlookers at this point, and the fact that they scattered when the cops showed up is not evidence of guilt, but is to be expected.

I have seen wild speculation about the number of attackers and the nature of the attack on Twitter and would just caution people to wait and see how it unfolds. You weren't there, you don't know.

The police stated # of attackers was 10, dummy.

Wrong. Teen boy and girl were arrested.

Not wrong, read the police report. While the police were only able to arrest two, there were others there who fled quickly. About 10 in all, according to the police. Again, read the police report before commenting.

DP. The police report is vague. It states that cops saw "approximately" ten people standing around a car "and attacking" the victims. This is a vague statement. Were all ten people attacking? Were some just standing there? Were some yelling? What were they yelling (were they egging the attackers on or were they upset? We don't know, and it's actually possible the cops don't even know. They saw a group of kids, some of them were clearly attacking this guy, most of them fled when the cops showed up, and two were arrested and IDed by the victims as attackers. The police report was drafted without any investigation, just a brief ID and statement from the victims.

We don't actually know what happened.

Good grief. You people will make excuses for anything.
It was not vague when it said "a group of approximately ten juveniles surrounding the complainants' vehicle and assaulting C-1."
It did not say "approximately two people." It did not say "approximately five people." And it did not say "only two individuals were assaulting C-1."

PP here and I'm not making excuses. I'm a lawyer. This is a crime, and at present, there are exactly two suspects and no hunt for additional assailants, only witnesses.

Some of you also don't seem to understand that a police report is a first draft, and this one is particularly short and vague.

Obviously Big Balls (good grief that name) was attacked and he has identified two people as his attackers. Those two people have been arrested. There were a number of other teens present and they fled when the cops arrived, but we do not currently know if they participated in the attack or not. Ideally we will find out. If at some point the MPD releases a statement that it is looking for additional assailants as identified by the victims or the two suspects, or that they have video footage of additional people attacking the victims, I will agree that there were however many number of attackers.

As of right now, we know there were two and that there were additional teens present. That's all we know. Some of us live in the land of fact and what can be proven, instead of the land of what is most fun to talk out of our a$$es about on Twitter.

Thank you. People here seem to hate a man who defends a woman from attackers.