Democrats who are upset

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push a massive anti-misinformation campaign.

This. Fight fire with fire.

Or, instead of misinformation, just get the damned truth out to the American people. There should be nonstop ads and Tik Toks about all of these executive orders and the bribes.

Sadly it seems like Americans aren't interested in the truth anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They need a centrist straight male candidate who can connect with every day people. But he needs to speak his mind and not just give canned politician answers. Also, the republicans were great at marketing/propoganda. The Dems need to follow that route.

A Clinton!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a former republican from a red state with MAGA parents. Here is what they need to do to win:

-Give up on increasing taxes for a cycle. Don’t touch trump’s tax code bc they think it helps them (it doesn’t)
-don’t focus on trans issues / pronouns. Most people in these red states have never met a trans person and they just don’t care
-focus on military, securing our nation
-focus on a strong immigration plan
-course correct everything T is doing. How will you fix federal funding? How will you protect our elderly? How will you help our college age kids? This is your largest base of voters.
-Get a Tim Walz type in. We need someone who has lived on a teachers salary. Limousine Liberals were the reason I hated democrats for so long. I was struggling financially and then someone making $1mil a year was trying to raise my taxes and just didn’t get my struggle.
-childcare: if you can make raising kids more affordable, you might be able to win some red state voters. You have to shape this in a way that doesn’t hurt kid free people.

Np here. I appreciate your input, and we need more people like you to share that perspective. And then we need to listen to these perspectives and share them with our representatives.

The bolded part - I hear this so often - about liberal elitists who can’t relate to them. And then they vote for…Trump? An actual silver spoon baby who lives in a golden tower/golden country club? I don’t think he was once seen interacting with a middle/lower class person prior to bursting into politics. I can’t think of a less relatable person. Why isn’t he accused of being an elitist nearly as much as democrats who came from a more modest background and worked hard to get where they are?

You did not say whether you ever voted for him. Either way, perhaps you can share some perspective on this?

Trump is wealthy that is true- but he is white tr___ ok, anyone can see that. He is German/scotch, eats overcooked meat with ketchup, wears ill fitting clothes and has ugly hair. he might be of a high economic class but socially- despite wharton (pfff Pennsylvania)- hes in british parlance common, he is not of the same social intellectual class as say Tom Cotton, Hawley, Obama etc. He is not hip, he is no different culturally than someone living on the gulf coast in a trailer and that is obvious. Lets be honest- joe biden has "bettered' himself but is capable of showing that side of himself. that is what most americans want-

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a former republican from a red state with MAGA parents. Here is what they need to do to win:

-Give up on increasing taxes for a cycle. Don’t touch trump’s tax code bc they think it helps them (it doesn’t)
-don’t focus on trans issues / pronouns. Most people in these red states have never met a trans person and they just don’t care
-focus on military, securing our nation
-focus on a strong immigration plan
-course correct everything T is doing. How will you fix federal funding? How will you protect our elderly? How will you help our college age kids? This is your largest base of voters.
-Get a Tim Walz type in. We need someone who has lived on a teachers salary. Limousine Liberals were the reason I hated democrats for so long. I was struggling financially and then someone making $1mil a year was trying to raise my taxes and just didn’t get my struggle.
-childcare: if you can make raising kids more affordable, you might be able to win some red state voters. You have to shape this in a way that doesn’t hurt kid free people.

The problem, friend, is that most of this is the antithesis of what the progressive wing of the party wants. And they call the shots.

Oh, and people in red states who have never met a trans person still care a lot about this issue. Just FYI.

I don't think the progressive wing constitutes a majority of Dems. And frankly they are losing us national elections. The Dems need to temper the progressives down a bit and refocus on the working class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW! How did that happen?



https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113919493392503946

You believe this?

Hmm, that kind of looks like what the stock market did yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They need a centrist straight male candidate who can connect with every day people. But he needs to speak his mind and not just give canned politician answers. Also, the republicans were great at marketing/propoganda. The Dems need to follow that route.

Because apparently Women can’t be centrist and have no great ideas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve said this before on here but the Democrats can’t win until they bridge the gap between the anti-labor DEI movement and the labor movement, and I am not sure they can do that.

It’s a very depressing situation.

If someone says they’re against DEI, forget the acronym.

Make them use the words.

Ask why they’re against diversity.
Ask why they’re against equity.
Ask why they’re against inclusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve said this before on here but the Democrats can’t win until they bridge the gap between the anti-labor DEI movement and the labor movement, and I am not sure they can do that.

It’s a very depressing situation.

If someone says they’re against DEI, forget the acronym.

Make them use the words.

Ask why they’re against diversity.
Ask why they’re against equity.
Ask why they’re against inclusion.

Because it's forced by government bureaucrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve said this before on here but the Democrats can’t win until they bridge the gap between the anti-labor DEI movement and the labor movement, and I am not sure they can do that.

It’s a very depressing situation.

If someone says they’re against DEI, forget the acronym.

Make them use the words.

Ask why they’re against diversity.
Ask why they’re against equity.
Ask why they’re against inclusion.

Because it's forced by government bureaucrats.

Because if they don't, YOU DISCRIMINATE.

[Anonymous]

this is not longer about democrats. or even republicans. these people aren't republicans. They are freaking extreme cult psycopaths.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Run a moderate white male, or a male of color who is extremely charismatic (e.g., Obama)

- Stop focusing on issues that impact the minority of the population (I don’t care if someone is trans, wants to go by they/them, is non-binary or whatever, and no one should be discriminated against for these things. but I do not know a single person falling into these categories - and I live in DC, not the middle of nowhere).
- Focus on issues that impact the vast majority of the population (both republicans and democrats): cost of childcare, cost of college, student loans, healthcare, etc.
- Make it clear that the Democratic Party does not condone illegal immigration in any way, shape or form, particularly violent criminals
- soften the language on the abortion issue (I am pro choice, but grew up Catholic and some of the democrats come off almost as if they are promoting abortion versus acknowledging that oftentimes it is a sad, difficult choice).

I am an independent, left leaning voter FWIW.

This +100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve said this before on here but the Democrats can’t win until they bridge the gap between the anti-labor DEI movement and the labor movement, and I am not sure they can do that.

It’s a very depressing situation.

What is the anti-labor DEI movement? As far as I can tell, the GOP weaponized "DEI" as a bogeyman.

DEI, at least the version of DEI embraced by corporations and the Democratic Party, is at heart an anti-labor movement. It is designed to sow distrust and discord between working class and middle class people who might otherwise unify on class-based issues.

You don’t believe this? Point out all the private schools, corporations, etc. that support “lower class” affinity groups. Show me the month dedicated to “Working Class History Month.” Tell me why Amazon threw so much money at the race-based affinity groups in their warehouses.

The answer is this: there are no “working class” affinity groups at most corporations. Why? Because those are called “unions.” DEI — at least the version of DEI championed by Democratic politicians — is directly contrary to unionization. It divides by race and sex/gender, elevating immutable characteristics over characteristics that would unify a struggling working and middle class.

And I do not see the Democrats winning until they figure out how to become truly pro-labor while also not angering the wealthy identity-focused donors who would prefer to keep labor weak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a Democrat but I think they could have won the last election if they had found a moderate Bill Clinton type.

100%

Kamala sucked. But we do need to become more moderate.

DEI was so unpopular. What were we thinking? Democrats and educators pushed too far, and when you push too far, there is always blowback.

Trump will push too far and the pendulum will swing back. Hopefully Dems don’t interpret that as popularity for progressive ideas.

100% Truth. But from what I continue to see most Democrats refuse to do this self-reflection and will refuse to make these changes. Most refuse to even admit that they went too far left. From what I see all they want to do is a repeat of what the DNC platform was during the last administration. Remember Kamala's words "I wouldn't change a thing".

That's what lost the election. But if Democrats simply go with a platform where they promise to bring back DEI, bring back all the gender pronouns and basically roll back every single thing the GOP Administration does in its 4 years...there's no hope.

I would love to see a third party rise from the ashes like a phoenix - the Common Sense Party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve said this before on here but the Democrats can’t win until they bridge the gap between the anti-labor DEI movement and the labor movement, and I am not sure they can do that.

It’s a very depressing situation.

If someone says they’re against DEI, forget the acronym.

Make them use the words.

Ask why they’re against diversity.
Ask why they’re against equity.
Ask why they’re against inclusion.

Equity is racist and Marxist social engineering. I believe in a meritocracy. MLK said that he had a dream that one day people would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Liberals don’t believe in his words. I hope for MLK’s dream for my children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you are a Democrat and unhappy with things politically, what do you think the Democrats should do differently so they win?

Listening to what the Trump voters are saying instead of calling them stupid would be a good first step.