Debate Moderator Fact Checks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.

Which questions were a surprise? Everything they asked was a fairly basic question about an obvious issue. Why would either of them need the questions ahead of time? They weren't being tricked with gotcha questions.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She has acknowledged that she used to be for banning fracking and has now reversed her opinion. Trump changes his opinion everyday on abortion!!

She is the incumbent. Please show a history of evidence she changed her mind in the past 3.5 years

No, she is NOT “the incumbent “. Do you really not understand what a VP is and does? Biden is the incumbent.

It’s ok. The changes of the last several weeks haven’t fully registered with Trump either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Uh, has fracking been banned under this administration? No? Then shouldn't she be getting credit for that as well as the record oil production under this administration? Oh, that's right. You only want to tie her to the policies that are inconvenient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Uh, has fracking been banned under this administration? No? Then shouldn't she be getting credit for that as well as the record oil production under this administration? Oh, that's right. You only want to tie her to the policies that are inconvenient.

She would except she keeps saying her values have not changed...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Uh, has fracking been banned under this administration? No? Then shouldn't she be getting credit for that as well as the record oil production under this administration? Oh, that's right. You only want to tie her to the policies that are inconvenient.

+1 She said at the debate that she cast the tie breaking vote on the IRA which massively expanded fracking leases.

[Anonymous]

Et tu NRO?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Also noticed these points you make. She never answered the question of being better off than 4 years ago. Wonder why that is? She could have easily prepared to say this is what has been accomplished in the last four years and here is my plan which you can also find on her XYZ website, leading into her 'opportunity economy' plan. That felon came after current administration's student loans plan etc..and she didn't really counter.

On abortion, I think it is clear where the two sides stand (or don't).

On J6 she may have been at the Capitol first then to the DNC...will need to check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Uh, has fracking been banned under this administration? No? Then shouldn't she be getting credit for that as well as the record oil production under this administration? Oh, that's right. You only want to tie her to the policies that are inconvenient.

She would except she keeps saying her values have not changed...

She said she's not banning fracking. This administration hasn't. That's their policy and hers. Or wasn't that clear for the last 3.5 years? You want to tie her to Afghanistan, the border, inflation, etc., but now you have a problem because this administration is doing what she says she supports? No, you don't get it both ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Words are cheap. Yet here you are, sharing your words with strangers, in a thread about a — wait for it — debate. Lol

[Anonymous]

I don’t care about fracking. So 2015!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And she evolved with her opinion over time. What is wrong with that?

Words are cheap. Show me evidence over the past 3.5 years

Words are cheap. Yet here you are, sharing your words with strangers, in a thread about a — wait for it — debate. Lol

Worse than that. The PP doesn't accept the fact that fracking hasn't been banned and Harris voted to expand fracking leases. It's a deliberate attempt to have it both ways (i.e., she's guilty of being part of the Biden administration for every potential controversy, but shouldn't get credit for policies that are politically popular). Nope, sorry. This is a stupid line of reasoning and the PP is too dim to see it. Words are cheap. We should stop wrestling with pigs because we both get in the mud and the pig likes it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

“Ma’am, this is a Wendy’s.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care about fracking. So 2015!

I care insofar as it wins Harris Pennsylvania.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

“THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS. THEY’RE EATING THE CATS. THEY’RE EATING THE PETS IN SPRINGFIELD.”

You all do love your conspiracies.