Debate Moderator Fact Checks

[Anonymous]

It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

[Anonymous]

They fact-checked outright lies, like Trump saying he won in 2020 or the BS about immigrants eating pets. They tried in some cases to make the candidates actually answer the question after they filibustered but that's an uphill battle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Weird that she promises to codify abortion rights through legislation when Democrats have had a gazillion opportunities to do that over the past 50 years with lots of times when Dems held clear majority in both houses but they didn’t want to touch it. Should we believe this or was this another missed fact check moment?

100 percent. But it’s the goose that laid the golden egg of votes. So they will NEVER fix it. And it’s been their voting cudgel for 30 years even before Roe was struck down. Trump should have said that but he missed so many opportunities to call her out on her BS. Not sure he wants this anymore.

[Anonymous]

Harris won the debate hands down. You did not get a repeat of Harris-Tulsi. Your boy was melting down in real time.
Deal with it, OP.

[Anonymous]

She won for sure. He didn’t do well. Both are true. Also true that the moderators didn’t ask her any real hard questions. They did ask her about fracking and they did ask her about whether she believed in abortion up to 9 month. But she didn’t answer either. She said she signed the tie breaking vote for fracking. That didn’t explain her view. She had a positive day but she skated in a lot of fluff and vibes and smiling teeth and hand motions. Light in substance as always and moderators let her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

The standards you hold her to vs Trump are absurd! Did you know in the US doctors are allowed to abort/murder full term babies born alive? /s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.

It’s not that hard to figure out on your own what the questions will be about! Plus she’s smart and prepared herself unlike Trump.

[Anonymous]

Trump was pathetic. Weak, rambling, angry, easily frustrated, hostile, like the grumpy old great-uncle your mother used to make you invite to the holidays until you finally put your foot down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was pathetic. Weak, rambling, angry, easily frustrated, hostile, like the grumpy old great-uncle your mother used to make you invite to the holidays until you finally put your foot down.

He also allowed himself to be led around like a dog on a leash, and by what? Some throwaway jabs about crowd size. Sad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

Sounds like the typical excuses losers make. 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.

Right, because who would have guessed that they would ask her about the economy, abortion, immigration, the economy and Ukraine? When you start claiming cheating, you know you’ve lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.

I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.

Of course you are going to think that. The reality is that Trump is not fit to be President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

The standards you hold her to vs Trump are absurd! Did you know in the US doctors are allowed to abort/murder full term babies born alive? /s.

Just look up with Governor Northam said. He is a doctor. He said what Trump described. It’s on video. It is real and it was the whole truth out load. Hard core abortion rights people believe a mother should have complete choice to eliminate her child the entire term and upon birth. She wasn’t forced to admit she wants no restrictions but that he has view. But don’t act like he lied. Northam said those things.

Kamala just killed a 78 y/o baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, your “to be fair” isn’t fair at all. Harris was indeed at the Capitol on January 6th — and that has been documented.

As to your concern about “voters (being) better off, that’s an overly general question, that you’re asking about millions of people. Some are, some aren’t. You have no idea what Harris thinks, and her view is likely more nuanced than yours. For example, people with health insurance thanks to the ACA are clearly “better off” in her view, while women and girls losing rights with respect to health care and abortion are clearly not better off in her view.

I think it’s weird that your posing as someone asking “fair” questions of Harris — when clearly you’re being anything but “fair” as well as either uninformed or posing as though you’re uninformed in the guise of asking questions about the moderators’ supposed “interests”.

The “better off” question was specifically addressing economically better off.

But nice spin.

There is no correct answer. I am better off, but some of my friends are not.