Look at UIUC netmath, Stanford ULO, your local state school, or see if your school would offer an independent study so your son can take some AoPS courses (e.g. intro to counting and probability, intro to number theory, and the intermediate versions of both) |
No I’m not a Bay Parent. If OP is confident her child is getting a quality and in depth precalc, then continue on. But in this area, a lot of the kids doing precalc in middle school are either doing a condensed summer course or some online program. I’d would be hesitate to push a kid on into AP calc if their precalc class wasn’t very strong |
I’m not all knowing in this, but our CC offers a Calc III which I believe would follow Calc BC, then you’d continue on with the above classes. |
They also often have a discrete math course and sometimes have a calc-based statistics course. |
Our private does, plus option to take further math at Hopkins, but we are in Baltimore. |
I have not seen a notable difference in college admission at our school between kids taking normal advanced track math (ending with calc bc) and those taking a year or two ahead. |
I’ve heard a department head namecheck a specific CC, “if you have a bunch of credit from Foothills, you’re not prepared for upper division courses.” |
PP here. If multi/diffeq 10th, linear/elective 11th, they could try to add discrete for 12th, but that is a semester. Or possibly logic or complex if school offers, but these wouldn't get much and may not fill the gap. The ones that can help with placement are Calc, multi, diffeq, linear. We did not see any real options to place out of other classes. I suppose those could be used to help with narrative. My kid (BC in 10th) took linear, discrete and complex in 12th. It would have gained her nothing to take BC in 9th, and she might have had a semester without a math or have to scramble to fill at cc. |
Sounds like taking Calc AB 9th, then Calc BC 10th would be the way to go, especially if that provides a solid underfooting outside of basic math. |
I have not either |
The OPs student planed to take Calculus in 9th and AP statistics in 10. So Multi and LA in 11th, then Diff Eq and Discrete in 12th. You don’t run out of classes, no need to take the AB+BC sequence. Another poster mentioned that CCs also have independent study that could substitute for a class. |
That would be terrible advice. If you took Precalculus honors and got an A you should be well prepared for BC. The Calculus AB overlap with BC is so high that you’d essentially take the same class twice. The only good reason people might take it is if they didn’t do well in precalculus and need to slow down, while still checking the box for rigorous coursework. At that point the better option is to repeat precalculus in 9th and do BC in 10th, so you’d be in the same spot. Otherwise you might bomb AB, and then you’d have to deal with a low GPA. When a kid is that accelerated he should be getting As and 5s on the exam. |
Anecdotally I have seen a difference, but those kids don’t rely only on the advanced math coursework. They also have APs in physics C, chemistry and biology and take APs in English, History and Foreign language. I don’t know if it’s the math that is the determining factor, but usually that correlates well with college admissions outcomes. |
Same. It really doesn't seem like a factor at all. |
All of the top kids at our school take all of those courses, and there are differences in maths but those do not result in different college outcomes. It is always something beyond the coursework. |