Anybody else disgusted with the Clinton wedding???

[Anonymous]

UGH. So many wedding haters. I hope you don't bother to attend any, because you would probably just go to judge anyway. How truly ugly of you.

We had a beautiful, lavish wedding. It was the day of my dreams (even though I never dreamed about my wedding). There were one or two haters that were invited - obviously I didn't know about their rotten attitude before hand. Apparently, they are quite unhappy in their own lives, as predicted.

They were edited right out of the wedding video! POOF! DONE!

[Anonymous]

I haven't read through the posts so sorry if this has already been addressed. But the 3M amount was a total rumor and completely false according to People magazine (my celebrity bible ). Apparently they ARE NOT having a 3M wedding.

[Anonymous]

Not disgusted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To 11:06 - this is why I left the democratic party and became a republican. Too much hypocrisy. That, and with a family income in excess of $250,000, I was tired of being rich in Obama's public pronouncements.

Still a dem but am sick of being called rich. I weed and clean. No one cares about fugly Chelsea and the press is all about the cost NOT the girl. I lost faith in the Clinton family business when Hilary didn't divorce his sorry ass after monica Lewinsky.

Sure people who own businesses will get a nice profit but the vast horde of minimum wage workers would be better off if they had a job that evaporated to another country.

Right. They'd be better off--unemployed? Wow, you're an idiot.

You're an idiot. That was obviously a typo on a message board. Luvs the slam on a typo while a critic ignores the key character issue of why she didn't divorce Bill. Even my teen DD dumps a BF with random BJ /sex. It's simply gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To 11:06 - this is why I left the democratic party and became a republican. Too much hypocrisy. That, and with a family income in excess of $250,000, I was tired of being rich in Obama's public pronouncements.

Still a dem but am sick of being called rich. I weed and clean. No one cares about fugly Chelsea and the press is all about the cost NOT the girl. I lost faith in the Clinton family business when Hilary didn't divorce his sorry ass after monica Lewinsky.

Sure people who own businesses will get a nice profit but the vast horde of minimum wage workers would be better off if they had a job that evaporated to another country.

Right. They'd be better off--unemployed? Wow, you're an idiot.

You're an idiot. That was obviously a typo on a message board. Luvs the slam on a typo while a critic ignores the key character issue of why she didn't divorce Bill. Even my teen DD dumps a BF with random BJ /sex. It's simply gross.

Being a liberated woman is all about CHOICE. Her CHOICE, not yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To 11:06 - this is why I left the democratic party and became a republican. Too much hypocrisy. That, and with a family income in excess of $250,000, I was tired of being rich in Obama's public pronouncements.

Still a dem but am sick of being called rich. I weed and clean. No one cares about fugly Chelsea and the press is all about the cost NOT the girl. I lost faith in the Clinton family business when Hilary didn't divorce his sorry ass after monica Lewinsky.

Sure people who own businesses will get a nice profit but the vast horde of minimum wage workers would be better off if they had a job that evaporated to another country.

Right. They'd be better off--unemployed? Wow, you're an idiot.

You're an idiot. That was obviously a typo on a message board. Luvs the slam on a typo while a critic ignores the key character issue of why she didn't divorce Bill. Even my teen DD dumps a BF with random BJ /sex. It's simply gross.

Being a liberated woman is all about CHOICE. Her CHOICE, not yours.

Her choice but the reality is his mouth/tongue/? from one to another. Not cool. And you wonder why teens girls put out and try to justify while they are called slampieces and randhos .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, the estimates are between 3 and 5 million.

only about a million, according to the last news report
drop in the bucket for the Clintons

And why do you give a rat's ass, OP?

jealous?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To 11:06 - this is why I left the democratic party and became a republican. Too much hypocrisy. That, and with a family income in excess of $250,000, I was tired of being rich in Obama's public pronouncements.

hypocrisy?

What about the foot stomper in the bathroom getting his balls licked by some other closeted fool?

hypocrisy . . .

[Anonymous]

I would be surprised if the wedding actually cost three million dollars. But even if it did, it's none of anyone's business how other people waste their money. Yes, lavish weddings are a waste. I just wish that the media would back off and let Chelsea and Marc celebrate in peace!

[Anonymous]

I would be surprised if the wedding actually cost three million dollars, but it's really none of anyone's business how others waste their money. Yes, lavish weddings are a waste. I just wish that the media would back off and let Chelsea and Marc celebrate their happy day in peace!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just another American girl who wants to play princess. Just because Prince William is going to have a big wedding she must. And she lived in the white house and went to that fancy school.
But that does not make her royalty. No blue blood. Just a father who xxx with a naive 20 something and she got an admissions break into the ivies.

Those who like can follow it in tv for all I care.

By the way, Swedens Princess got married recently too.

Now those are real royals and blue blood

1. Chelsea's wedding is not being paid for with taxpayer money. It's her parents' money, they earned it so I don't care how much they spend on the wedding or anything else that does not hurt others.
2. Bill Clinton has done more for poor people with his Global Initiative than most of us ever will.
3. Royal weddings and luxury lifestyles ARE funded by taxpayer money so you are saying that you approve of poor people (some of whom may be struggling with basic expenses) paying for privileged royals to have expensive weddings but you disapprove of a non-royal having a big wedding that doesn't cost taxpayers anything and is paid for with money that the parents worked hard for with jobs extending beyond 9 to 5. That's outrageous. BTW, in case you didn't know, sorry to break it to you but royals are simply human beings too. They are just wealthier and far more privileged than "commoners".
4. You stated that Chelsea got admission into ivys because of her family name, in the same post where you are drooling over royals. What, you think that she had an advantage but royals don't have an admissions edge to top schoo;s and colleges? Puhleeze.

Think before you judge.

[Anonymous]

She looked beautiful. And Hillary looked great, too.

[Anonymous]

Gorgeous dress. I think it's fun looking at the pics they released...I love weddings.

[Anonymous]

I agree that she looked great and so did Hilary and I totally can't stand Hilary but I'll give it to her that she indeed did look great.

[Anonymous]

another rich girl wedding. all look same to me.