Anybody else disgusted with the Clinton wedding???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gorgeous dress. I think it's fun looking at the pics they released...I love weddings.

agree

She looks lovely in her size two Vera Wang!

more power to the Clintons!

LOVE that former first family!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
1. Chelsea's wedding is not being paid for with taxpayer money. It's her parents' money, they earned it so I don't care how much they spend on the wedding or anything else that does not hurt others.
2. Bill Clinton has done more for poor people with his Global Initiative than most of us ever will.
3. Royal weddings and luxury lifestyles ARE funded by taxpayer money so you are saying that you approve of poor people (some of whom may be struggling with basic expenses) paying for privileged royals to have expensive weddings but you disapprove of a non-royal having a big wedding that doesn't cost taxpayers anything and is paid for with money that the parents worked hard for with jobs extending beyond 9 to 5. That's outrageous. BTW, in case you didn't know, sorry to break it to you but royals are simply human beings too. They are just wealthier and far more privileged than "commoners".
4. You stated that Chelsea got admission into ivys because of her family name, in the same post where you are drooling over royals. What, you think that she had an advantage but royals don't have an admissions edge to top schoo;s and colleges? Puhleeze.

Think before you judge.

1. tax payers are footing the security bill, amongst others
2. Global initiative fund is not all it claims to be
3. Royal weddings are for the royals. Chelsea is not a royal, just a human being, but not equal to a royal because that she is not
4. Clintons are not squeeky clean and spotless, they have several financial scandals behind their name and that is not what most would call 'working hard' with jobs extending 9 to 5
5. I will rather drool over a real royal

[Anonymous]

Please - "real royal"

Who if the F is a real royal?

Fergie?

Such nonsense! Let the girl have her day. It's not as though she's lived an easy life.

Sorry that you're missing the Bush administration, PP!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
1. Chelsea's wedding is not being paid for with taxpayer money. It's her parents' money, they earned it so I don't care how much they spend on the wedding or anything else that does not hurt others.
2. Bill Clinton has done more for poor people with his Global Initiative than most of us ever will.
3. Royal weddings and luxury lifestyles ARE funded by taxpayer money so you are saying that you approve of poor people (some of whom may be struggling with basic expenses) paying for privileged royals to have expensive weddings but you disapprove of a non-royal having a big wedding that doesn't cost taxpayers anything and is paid for with money that the parents worked hard for with jobs extending beyond 9 to 5. That's outrageous. BTW, in case you didn't know, sorry to break it to you but royals are simply human beings too. They are just wealthier and far more privileged than "commoners".
4. You stated that Chelsea got admission into ivys because of her family name, in the same post where you are drooling over royals. What, you think that she had an advantage but royals don't have an admissions edge to top schoo;s and colleges? Puhleeze.

Think before you judge.

1. tax payers are footing the security bill, amongst others
2. Global initiative fund is not all it claims to be
3. Royal weddings are for the royals. Chelsea is not a royal, just a human being, but not equal to a royal because that she is not
4. Clintons are not squeeky clean and spotless, they have several financial scandals behind their name and that is not what most would call 'working hard' with jobs extending 9 to 5
5. I will rather drool over a real royal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just a father who xxx with a naive 20 something and she got an admissions break into the ivies.

Without that family name she would not have gotten into Sidwell, or into Stanford. Neither would Obamas daughters have been admitted

Sounds like you just found some sour grapes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To 11:06 - this is why I left the democratic party and became a republican. Too much hypocrisy. That, and with a family income in excess of $250,000, I was tired of being rich in Obama's public pronouncements.

You brag about becoming a republican and you only make $250,000 per year. You are a pauper"republican--that is why I'm not using a capital "R" for republican. You will not fit in with them socially with so little money. Sad, sad, sad. Also, you won't be nvited to Barbara Bush's wedding.

[Anonymous]

Have not read the other replies. Seems to me if you drive a nice car, have nice clothes, enjoy a steak dinner, or anything else that is not a necessity, then OP, you are being hypocritical. If you are so concerned about the starving masses, sell all your crap and go be a volunteer for the peace corps.

It's all just a matter of degrees of selfishness vs sacrifice.

[Anonymous]

well, the wedding is over
hopefully will not hear anymore about any Clinton

[Anonymous]

Oh please. If the media and gossips weren't hounding this girl all over the damn place, they wouldn't have to spend as much money in the first place. Chelsea clearly tries to be classy and low-profile. No one knows what they spent on her wedding, and who cares? OP, I'm sure there are a lot of things in your life that you choose over donating to clean-drinking-water causes. You ever buy coffee at Starbucks? Well, you could make it at home or stop drinking it altogether, and donate the difference to people without clean drinking water. Do you buy clothing in stores? You could buy only at thrift stores and donate the difference. Do you live in a house? You could live in a small condo instead and donate the difference. You could have one fewer (or no) cars, or skip vacations, or or or or or... The point is, we all make decisions about our discretionary income and no one's a saint.

And again, what the wedding costs -- TOTAL SPECULATION.

I'll tell you what disgusts me a lot more -- corporate greed like this
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/31/AR2010073100035.html

[Anonymous]

With all that money she should have known how to do her makeup. Mascara and eyeliner too dark for her complexion.

[Anonymous]

Oh boy...there go Jealous Americans again........

[Anonymous]

I love how interfaith couples are the news topic now (sarcasm) like this is some hot new trend. Gimme a break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really? Does a girl really need a 3 million dollar wedding??? There are people in this world without clean drinking water. Gross. Such a stark contrast to the Jenna Bush wedding. Politics aside.

You sound Republican.