Okay - but would you go to jail for that? SMH |
Depends |
Says who? Sex criminals are usually chronic recidivists. This person clearly feels no remorse. |
1. more minimizing here - "it's not assault, she had pants on!" and 2. bravo person replying - literal spit take, there is tea on my screen now. |
There's no point arguing with these people. I complained on another thread about public transit that I refused to ride it after I had my breast squeezed by a "gentleman" passenger and I was told to suck it up because that's just part of living in a city. |
Or if you were a minor should you go to adult jail for that? |
Stop lying. No one said “it wasn’t assault”. Just that he didn’t actually touch her “genitals”. |
Immediately jumping to worst case scenarios for a minor is injustice. |
Calling groping “heinous” minimizing the crimes that actually are “heinous”. His future isn’t written in stone. He is a minor and should be guided towards doing the right thing, not thrown away in jail for a long time. |
Why would she be charged with manslaughter? |
| Three strikes law. He did it five times. Jail for life. We all know it's not getting better from here. |
yes he did touch her genitals. through her clothes is still touching. and he was trying to pull down her pants. |
ffs. a child who is engaging in repetitive sexual assaults of strangers has serious serious issues. this wasn’t a “prank.” ignoring the severity does nothing for this kid. |
there is something wrong with this person mentally. it’s not lack of “guidance.” it’s a mental issue and possibly a history of abuse. serial sexual abusers start young. but very nice that you care so much about him, and nothing about his future victims of escalated assaults. |
Wait so like...if you grab someones boobs above the shirt you didn't touch their boobs, you touched their shirt? This position is deeply not defensible friend. |