Anyone catch this on Reddit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He attacked women

Hit enter too soon.

He attacked women FIVE TIMES. That is a sexual predator, not a prankster. Jesus. What the hell is wrong with some of you??

I don’t think disgusting PP is a “soft on crime” postet. I think he is one of our resident MRAs.

Yes, the PP who thinks this kid is basically a murderer is disgusting.

All PPs except for you correctly think he is an extremely troubled sexual predator. We probably differ in how he should be treated but all think the sentence is not sufficient.

I think he’s a troubled kid who assaulted women but not in a “heinous” way. He should be held accountable and get treatment. But he’s a minor and it’s his first offense so the sentence is reasonable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read the Reddit post. The perpetrator didn't even try to fake remorse. After 2 weeks of sleep away camp he'll be back on the street.

Obviously something is very wrong with him. I hope he gets some serious help.

But grabbing someone and running away is not the same as a rape. I don't know what the appropriate legal consequences are for a 17 YO but lock up with accomplished criminals isn't it. Long term therapy maybe? Good luck getting "the system" to pay for that.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s say this kid jumped out of the bushes with the intention of groping a woman. The woman doesn’t know his intention. He immediately grabs her crotch. She assumes she’ll be raped and chooses fight mode. She pulls out her legally registered concealed gun and shoots the perp with the intention of preventing rape. She’s a sharp shooter and he dies. She’s charged with manslaughter at best or murder. Is this justice? These degenerates need to be rehabilitated in prison for the duration of extent of the crime. I’m not a Republican.

So 5 minutes for each assault? Guess he's being treated disproportionately roughly. How unfair.

Would a woman be justified in shooting him? Probably. That doesn't make his assault heinous though.

Who are you to deem it not heinous? And the truly heinous part is that he filmed it and did it FIVE times. Where do you think a kid like this is heading?

Calling groping “heinous” minimizing the crimes that actually are “heinous”.

His future isn’t written in stone. He is a minor and should be guided towards doing the right thing, not thrown away in jail for a long time.

there is something wrong with this person mentally. it’s not lack of “guidance.” it’s a mental issue and possibly a history of abuse. serial sexual abusers start young. but very nice that you care so much about him, and nothing about his future victims of escalated assaults.

DP. He was caught and he is facing consequences.

Future victims? Are you Cassandra, is this Minority Report? Why is he already irredeemable and deserving of life in prison to some posters on this thread?

Exactly. The extreme overreaction sounds politically motivated to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He attacked women

Hit enter too soon.

He attacked women FIVE TIMES. That is a sexual predator, not a prankster. Jesus. What the hell is wrong with some of you??

I don’t think disgusting PP is a “soft on crime” postet. I think he is one of our resident MRAs.

Yes, the PP who thinks this kid is basically a murderer is disgusting.

All PPs except for you correctly think he is an extremely troubled sexual predator. We probably differ in how he should be treated but all think the sentence is not sufficient.

I think he’s a troubled kid who assaulted women but not in a “heinous” way. He should be held accountable and get treatment. But he’s a minor and it’s his first offense so the sentence is reasonable.

Fifth offense. FIVE sexual assaults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He attacked women

Hit enter too soon.

He attacked women FIVE TIMES. That is a sexual predator, not a prankster. Jesus. What the hell is wrong with some of you??

I don’t think disgusting PP is a “soft on crime” postet. I think he is one of our resident MRAs.

Yes, the PP who thinks this kid is basically a murderer is disgusting.

All PPs except for you correctly think he is an extremely troubled sexual predator. We probably differ in how he should be treated but all think the sentence is not sufficient.

I think he’s a troubled kid who assaulted women but not in a “heinous” way. He should be held accountable and get treatment. But he’s a minor and it’s his first offense so the sentence is reasonable.

Fifth offense. FIVE sexual assaults.

First offense in the judicial system.


https://www.arlnow.com/2023/10/20/arlington-teen-receives-10-day-sentence-for-assaulting-five-women-last-year/

The teen pleaded guilty to three counts of assault and battery, according to a source familiar with the case. He is expected to spend 10 days in the Landmark juvenile detention facility in Alexandria, with 80 days of the 90 day sentence suspended.

In addition to juvenile detention, the teen will have one year of probation and will undergo a psychosexual evaluation to determine if he needs therapy. He will be required to complete whatever is recommended.
If he does not complete this or has any run-ins with the law during probation, the rest of his 80-day suspended sentence could be imposed. That means he would wind up back in the juvenile detention facility or adult jail, if this happens after he turns 18.

The teen pleaded to the crime of assault and battery, which is what police initially sought charges for, per a May press release.
This means he did not plead to a lower charge as part of a deal. A condition of his guilty plea to the unamended charges, however, was that it be for three, not five, counts.
The victim noted her assailant was not charged with criminal sexual battery because of a “quirk” in Virginia law.
That “quirk” is that criminal sexual battery, per state code, must be “by force, threat, intimidation or ruse.” This teen, however, assailed each woman victim from behind, taking them by surprise, which is not an element of state code, the source familiar the case said.



A child’s home life, mental status, criminal history, age and other factors all go into determining a sentence. Overall, however, juvenile court is set up to prioritize rehabilitation over incarceration where possible.
Per state code, the court is charged with, where possible, avoiding or minimizing jail or detention time and relying on alternative programs, consistent with public safety.
State code also says the court should only separate children from their families “in the interest of public safety and then only after consideration of alternatives to out-of-home placement which afford effective protection to the child, his family, and the community.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He attacked women

Hit enter too soon.

He attacked women FIVE TIMES. That is a sexual predator, not a prankster. Jesus. What the hell is wrong with some of you??

I don’t think disgusting PP is a “soft on crime” postet. I think he is one of our resident MRAs.

Yes, the PP who thinks this kid is basically a murderer is disgusting.

All PPs except for you correctly think he is an extremely troubled sexual predator. We probably differ in how he should be treated but all think the sentence is not sufficient.

I think he’s a troubled kid who assaulted women but not in a “heinous” way. He should be held accountable and get treatment. But he’s a minor and it’s his first offense so the sentence is reasonable.

Fifth offense. FIVE sexual assaults.

First offense in the judicial system.


https://www.arlnow.com/2023/10/20/arlington-teen-receives-10-day-sentence-for-assaulting-five-women-last-year/

The teen pleaded guilty to three counts of assault and battery, according to a source familiar with the case. He is expected to spend 10 days in the Landmark juvenile detention facility in Alexandria, with 80 days of the 90 day sentence suspended.

In addition to juvenile detention, the teen will have one year of probation and will undergo a psychosexual evaluation to determine if he needs therapy. He will be required to complete whatever is recommended.
If he does not complete this or has any run-ins with the law during probation, the rest of his 80-day suspended sentence could be imposed. That means he would wind up back in the juvenile detention facility or adult jail, if this happens after he turns 18.

The teen pleaded to the crime of assault and battery, which is what police initially sought charges for, per a May press release.
This means he did not plead to a lower charge as part of a deal. A condition of his guilty plea to the unamended charges, however, was that it be for three, not five, counts.
The victim noted her assailant was not charged with criminal sexual battery because of a “quirk” in Virginia law.
That “quirk” is that criminal sexual battery, per state code, must be “by force, threat, intimidation or ruse.” This teen, however, assailed each woman victim from behind, taking them by surprise, which is not an element of state code, the source familiar the case said.



A child’s home life, mental status, criminal history, age and other factors all go into determining a sentence. Overall, however, juvenile court is set up to prioritize rehabilitation over incarceration where possible.
Per state code, the court is charged with, where possible, avoiding or minimizing jail or detention time and relying on alternative programs, consistent with public safety.
State code also says the court should only separate children from their families “in the interest of public safety and then only after consideration of alternatives to out-of-home placement which afford effective protection to the child, his family, and the community.”

I researched the “quirk” in Virginia law. It’s actually an astonishingly bad judicial interpretation of the word “force.”

[Anonymous]

Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

Ok, cowboy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

Ok, cowboy.

ask yourself why this little sick f*ck was only targeting women. because a) he gets off on it and b) knows they aren’t going to be able to hurt him.

minimizing his conduct is only possible if you’re an absolutely rank rape apologist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

Ok, cowboy.

ask yourself why this little sick f*ck was only targeting women. because a) he gets off on it and b) knows they aren’t going to be able to hurt him.

minimizing his conduct is only possible if you’re an absolutely rank rape apologist.

You’re so tough, cowboy. You’ll really show him.

[Anonymous]

Calm down, folks. All of the targets were only women, and none of them were pregnant with fetuses, so let's not ruin a young man's life over victimless pranks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

Ok, cowboy.

ask yourself why this little sick f*ck was only targeting women. because a) he gets off on it and b) knows they aren’t going to be able to hurt him.

minimizing his conduct is only possible if you’re an absolutely rank rape apologist.

You’re so tough, cowboy. You’ll really show him.

you’re really a sick puppy

[Anonymous]

I'm honored that we seem to have two sitting Supreme Court justices commenting on this thread.

It's a great relief that the streets of Virginia are safe for lonely men who just want a moment of intimacy in the evenings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The worst part is he will be back in a regular high school where there are usually NO consequences when he grabs and gropes and sexually harasses girls and teachers.

Often times teens like this are in special education under emotionally disturbed or other health impaired due to ADHD. So their parents say they have impulse control issues and can't help it so it is a manifestation of their disability so they CAN'T be punished. So they aren't punished, so they get to stay in school to harass and terrorize more of their classmates and teachers.

This is an awful consequence of the juvenile justice system no longer incarcerating teens who deserve to be incarcerated in camps or some other structured program. Incarceration rates are down 70%. Schools now have to deal with these kids. So much time is spent by administrators on kids who 10 years ago would have been incarcerated for sexual offenses, attempted murder, car jackings, etc.

This is why we need girls in sports, so they can deck creeps like this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me tell you if he did this to me I would kill him in self defense. And I would not go to jail.

Ok, cowboy.

I did have a little shit (not this one) grab me by the breast near the Ballston Metro station. It hurt like hell, and I slapped him so hard that it knocked him to the ground and it looked like his head hit the curb. I saw some blood and he screamed in pain and I ran like hell. If it didn't hurt my breast, I don't think I would have acted so reflexively and he would have run away.