If she knows, not only do other family members know, but the kids know, too. They just aren’t going around announcing it to some old lady frenemy of their mom’s. |
I mean, there has been research into how adult adoptees and donor conceived people feel about their biological relatives. Some (but not all) studies have statistically reasonable population sizes and well written questions. PP is right that the majority of adults not raised by their biological parents/donors feel some curiousity at some point about that. How much and when varies and the DH’s total lack of interest isn’t unusual either. The problem is that you don’t know how your kids will feel about it when you choose to have them so there’s a general societal movement toward giving the eventual adults choice in the matter, hence to move toward open adoption and openid donors (and banning of any anonymous gamete donation outside of the U.S.). |
But that research has to be flawed from the get go. The samples cannot be unbiased. You cannot force people to agree to be studied and answer your questions. You’re going to get the more vocal, activist types to respond. The sort of people who just live their lives are not gonna participate. As a parent, you never know how your kids will feel about anything when they grow up. But it’s impossible to say what is or isn’t the norm for adopted/donor kids because you’re not going to hear as much from the happier, better adjusted ones. |
One of the studies I’m referring to was done by a sperm bank with openid donors. They tracked whether adult donor conceived people ever contacted the sperm bank to attempt to contact their donor. They had further breakdowns on why/what their feelings were that related to surveys sent out and answered but the first comparison (people who decide to contact their donors and what age they choose to do so and what their family structure was at the time of conception) does not require them to respond to a survey. Apparently children of single parents are most likely to contact their donors and children of straight couples are least likely. I haven’t read any of the adoption studies recently enough to remember the details but announcing that all social sciences must be meaningless since only activists will respond to surveys is quite a declaration. |
Social sciences are called soft sciences for a reason. I’m not the first and I certainly won’t be the last to say that most social science research is biased and dictated by the desired outcomes of the researchers. The study you mentioned is a perfect example. They were looking at how many donor children contacted a sperm bank about their open id donors. Well, if the parents chose an open id donor, they must have felt it was important for their child to one day contact that donor, otherwise they would have chosen an anonymous donor. So, you’re already starting with a group that wants to establish communication with the donor from the get go. You also have donors who want to establish contact from the start. You are beginning with a group of people who is more likely to want to contact their biological relatives based on both their environment and their biology. It’s pretty remarkable if any of the donor kids don’t decide to contact their open id donor under these circumstances. Can you really not see how biased this is? |
It's not a tough call. She is literally denying these kids knowing their true medical history, which is awful. Also in this day and age where 23and me tests are a dime a dozen, the kids are bound to find out. |
I disagree about the popularity of DNA tests. There were a novelty when their first came out, but now most of the people I know are very wary of taking them. I have a cousin who took 23andMe and found nothing interesting or unexpected. (The only tidbit he learned was he had no Native American ancestry. Like many families we had rumors, but it turns out those were unfounded.) For my part, I was so annoyed because now my DNA is also out there, without my consent. I suspect that fewer and fewer people will expose themselves like that down the road. |
Let me see if I understand: donor conceived people will go through life having to have a DNA test with everyone they go out with to make sure they are not related? What kind of Hell you have created for your donor conceived child! |
Answer: you don’t understand. All they have to do is ask if the other person was donor conceived. The vast majority of people are not. |
What if they were no ever told that they were donor conceived? This is a question one would need to ask very early in relationships and. Personally, I would run away fast from anyone who was donor conceived! |
Okay, thanks for sharing. You make zero sense, first you say that the potential donor conceived child wouldn’t that know he or she was donor conceived. Then you say you need to ask potential dates early on about whether they were donor conceived? Why? If, as you insist, the person wouldn’t know, why bother asking? It’s probably best for you to stay out of the dating and mating pool altogether. Thanks! |
They could be the donor’s biological child. I have DE kids and while I have not looked for any half siblings of theirs I assume that they probably exist but the donor herself could have had her own children. |
Why do you keep up with that stuff? They don’t have half siblings. They’re not legal siblings. |
Are you insane? |
I really hope you aren’t actually worried about the ridiculously minuscule possibility of your child marrying or mating with a biological half sibling. It’s unlikely your donor was able to have multiple rounds of IVF. She probably made a few donations total. Likewise, she’ll probably only have a few kids who will likely be much younger than yours because your donor was probably a young, unmarried woman when she donated. And even if your kids did meet and married, their kids would probably be fine. In the olden days, first cousins used to marry each other for generations and generations. Unless there’s some sort of recessive gene condition, it should be a nonissue with just one half-sibling marriage. Even when two people share the same recessive gene for a terrible genetic disease, there is still an 75% chance that their child will not be affected. And I’ll bet the donor was thoroughly screened for such issues. I really cannot understand why people worry about this sort of thing. You might as well worry about a plane crashing into your house. It’s just as likely. Plus, a lot of the kids I know who have health issues/genetic disorders have parents from very diverse backgrounds. Sh— happens. |