Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like all those foreign governments and actors paying the Biden family might have expected something for their money beyond photo ops and invitations.


Right wing lies. Payments for influence are legal.


It is legal for a foreign country to pay the VP of the US to get favorable policies? Really? Is their a cap on how much they can pay?


Actually it is almost certainly legal. Under McDonnell v. US, it is only illegal if the bribe is paid in exchange for an "official act" and "official act" means a "formal exercise of governmental power." Setting up a meeting or urging some other official to do something doesn't count. And since the VP has no formal power at all over foreign policy, he could not possibly have done an "official act."


Really?



He had no formal power to do that. He may have advised Obama to order it or something. But the VP can't do that on his own authority. If you think otherwise, cite the statute giving him that power.


We shall see now, won't we? And, I have heard this is part of what this whistleblower's complaint is about.


The whistleblower is a MAGA insurrectionist. Who cares what the traitor has to say?


You know who the whistleblower is?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like all those foreign governments and actors paying the Biden family might have expected something for their money beyond photo ops and invitations.


Right wing lies. Payments for influence are legal.


It is legal for a foreign country to pay the VP of the US to get favorable policies? Really? Is their a cap on how much they can pay?


Actually it is almost certainly legal. Under McDonnell v. US, it is only illegal if the bribe is paid in exchange for an "official act" and "official act" means a "formal exercise of governmental power." Setting up a meeting or urging some other official to do something doesn't count. And since the VP has no formal power at all over foreign policy, he could not possibly have done an "official act."


Really?



He had no formal power to do that. He may have advised Obama to order it or something. But the VP can't do that on his own authority. If you think otherwise, cite the statute giving him that power.


We shall see now, won't we? And, I have heard this is part of what this whistleblower's complaint is about.


The whistleblower is a MAGA insurrectionist. Who cares what the traitor has to say?


The whistleblower has not been identified. What you are reporting is speculation, at best.


Whatever it is, it isn’t a whistleblower.


Then, call the person a "Truth teller." Whoever he/she is, the left is in a bit of a panic about it.


There’s no panic on the left. It’s obviously bullshit. I said it isn’t a whistleblower because a legit whistleblower has hard evidence of something criminal not innuendo and conspiracy fantasies like the laptop and all the other Giuliani disinformation. If there was any solid evidence delivered to anyone anywhere in 2020 it would have been leaked and exposed. This is just more Republican disinformation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another question... why was the head of counter intelligence at the FBI in NY (Charles McGonigal) arrested in January 2023?

Because he was taking money from a Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, with ties to Trump and other Republicans. He was the section chief of Cyber-Counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters in 2015-2016 and spearheading the Trump-Russia investigation while Russia was trying to help Trump win via hacking.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/retired-top-fbi-counterintelligence-agent-led-trump-russia-probe-arrested-own-ties-russian-oligarch

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1563476/download


Unlike BHR CEO Jonathan Li's connection to the "big guy", you can't cite these "ties". Nice try though

I didn’t think I had to because it’s so obvious. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort owed Deripaska $10 million but was working for the Trump campaign for free and offering Deripaska private briefings.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Additionally, Mitch McConnell blocked a Senate bill sanctioning Deripaska’s company, allowing it to open a facility in Kentucky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-a-mcconnell-backed-effort-to-lift-russian-sanctions-boosted-a-kentucky-project/2019/08/13/72b26e00-b97c-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html

Now cite whatever TF you’re talking about, and not using Tony Bobolinski who Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal found to be not credible. TIA!


Awwww... bless your little heart!

Did Deripaska's son get a college recommendation letter from Trump like Joe did for Li? Did Deripaska have a key to Trump Tower like Li did for Bidens office in Georgetown after leaving the VP office? As for the WSJ, didn't know they're the authority on Tony Bobolinski who was interviewed for 5 hours by the FBI (and committed perjury per Rupert Murdoch)

Meanwhile when will Hunter pay back the $2 million to Kevin Morris for his back taxes?

Tucker Carlson’s son got a college recommendation letter from Hunter himself. That’s serious weak sauce.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another question... why was the head of counter intelligence at the FBI in NY (Charles McGonigal) arrested in January 2023?

Because he was taking money from a Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, with ties to Trump and other Republicans. He was the section chief of Cyber-Counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters in 2015-2016 and spearheading the Trump-Russia investigation while Russia was trying to help Trump win via hacking.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/retired-top-fbi-counterintelligence-agent-led-trump-russia-probe-arrested-own-ties-russian-oligarch

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1563476/download


Unlike BHR CEO Jonathan Li's connection to the "big guy", you can't cite these "ties". Nice try though

I didn’t think I had to because it’s so obvious. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort owed Deripaska $10 million but was working for the Trump campaign for free and offering Deripaska private briefings.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Additionally, Mitch McConnell blocked a Senate bill sanctioning Deripaska’s company, allowing it to open a facility in Kentucky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-a-mcconnell-backed-effort-to-lift-russian-sanctions-boosted-a-kentucky-project/2019/08/13/72b26e00-b97c-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html

Now cite whatever TF you’re talking about, and not using Tony Bobolinski who Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal found to be not credible. TIA!


Awwww... bless your little heart!

Did Deripaska's son get a college recommendation letter from Trump like Joe did for Li? Did Deripaska have a key to Trump Tower like Li did for Bidens office in Georgetown after leaving the VP office? As for the WSJ, didn't know they're the authority on Tony Bobolinski who was interviewed for 5 hours by the FBI (and committed perjury per Rupert Murdoch)

Meanwhile when will Hunter pay back the $2 million to Kevin Morris for his back taxes?

Noticing that you haven’t cited anything.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another question... why was the head of counter intelligence at the FBI in NY (Charles McGonigal) arrested in January 2023?

Because he was taking money from a Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, with ties to Trump and other Republicans. He was the section chief of Cyber-Counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters in 2015-2016 and spearheading the Trump-Russia investigation while Russia was trying to help Trump win via hacking.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/retired-top-fbi-counterintelligence-agent-led-trump-russia-probe-arrested-own-ties-russian-oligarch

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1563476/download


Unlike BHR CEO Jonathan Li's connection to the "big guy", you can't cite these "ties". Nice try though

I didn’t think I had to because it’s so obvious. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort owed Deripaska $10 million but was working for the Trump campaign for free and offering Deripaska private briefings.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Additionally, Mitch McConnell blocked a Senate bill sanctioning Deripaska’s company, allowing it to open a facility in Kentucky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-a-mcconnell-backed-effort-to-lift-russian-sanctions-boosted-a-kentucky-project/2019/08/13/72b26e00-b97c-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html

Now cite whatever TF you’re talking about, and not using Tony Bobolinski who Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal found to be not credible. TIA!


Awwww... bless your little heart!

Did Deripaska's son get a college recommendation letter from Trump like Joe did for Li? Did Deripaska have a key to Trump Tower like Li did for Bidens office in Georgetown after leaving the VP office? As for the WSJ, didn't know they're the authority on Tony Bobolinski who was interviewed for 5 hours by the FBI (and committed perjury per Rupert Murdoch)

Meanwhile when will Hunter pay back the $2 million to Kevin Morris for his back taxes?

Noticing that you haven’t cited anything.


Bobulinski, who was about to lose his house because he was on the hook to pay $600k because of FRAUD he committed - and magically the money appeared right as he spoke out about the big "10 for the big guy" deal - which we now know didn't actually happen. And even more curious was the fact that Bobulinski's "corroborating evidence" was screenshots from an iPhone that were being displayed on a blackberry with a cracked screen which at the top showed it was connected to 'MTS RUS' which is a RUSSIAN cellphone provider.



But then you keep insisting we're insane for any notion whatsoever of there being a Russian connection here?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another question... why was the head of counter intelligence at the FBI in NY (Charles McGonigal) arrested in January 2023?

Because he was taking money from a Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, with ties to Trump and other Republicans. He was the section chief of Cyber-Counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters in 2015-2016 and spearheading the Trump-Russia investigation while Russia was trying to help Trump win via hacking.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/retired-top-fbi-counterintelligence-agent-led-trump-russia-probe-arrested-own-ties-russian-oligarch

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1563476/download


Unlike BHR CEO Jonathan Li's connection to the "big guy", you can't cite these "ties". Nice try though

I didn’t think I had to because it’s so obvious. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort owed Deripaska $10 million but was working for the Trump campaign for free and offering Deripaska private briefings.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Additionally, Mitch McConnell blocked a Senate bill sanctioning Deripaska’s company, allowing it to open a facility in Kentucky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-a-mcconnell-backed-effort-to-lift-russian-sanctions-boosted-a-kentucky-project/2019/08/13/72b26e00-b97c-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html

Now cite whatever TF you’re talking about, and not using Tony Bobolinski who Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal found to be not credible. TIA!


Awwww... bless your little heart!

Did Deripaska's son get a college recommendation letter from Trump like Joe did for Li? Did Deripaska have a key to Trump Tower like Li did for Bidens office in Georgetown after leaving the VP office? As for the WSJ, didn't know they're the authority on Tony Bobolinski who was interviewed for 5 hours by the FBI (and committed perjury per Rupert Murdoch)

Meanwhile when will Hunter pay back the $2 million to Kevin Morris for his back taxes?

Noticing that you haven’t cited anything.


Bobulinski, who was about to lose his house because he was on the hook to pay $600k because of FRAUD he committed - and magically the money appeared right as he spoke out about the big "10 for the big guy" deal - which we now know didn't actually happen. And even more curious was the fact that Bobulinski's "corroborating evidence" was screenshots from an iPhone that were being displayed on a blackberry with a cracked screen which at the top showed it was connected to 'MTS RUS' which is a RUSSIAN cellphone provider.



But then you keep insisting we're insane for any notion whatsoever of there being a Russian connection here?


Sketchy Bobulinski, gets himself in a bunch of trouble, has to pay a lot of money. Turns up out of nowhere, obviously in Russia, provides sketchy "evidence" against Biden, makes a few statements and appearances, inexplicably all of his deep financial problems get paid off and go away, after which, Bobulinski fades away as well.

"Nothing to see here..." Riiiiiiiight. Stinks to high heaven.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another question... why was the head of counter intelligence at the FBI in NY (Charles McGonigal) arrested in January 2023?

Because he was taking money from a Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, with ties to Trump and other Republicans. He was the section chief of Cyber-Counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters in 2015-2016 and spearheading the Trump-Russia investigation while Russia was trying to help Trump win via hacking.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/retired-top-fbi-counterintelligence-agent-led-trump-russia-probe-arrested-own-ties-russian-oligarch

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1563476/download


Unlike BHR CEO Jonathan Li's connection to the "big guy", you can't cite these "ties". Nice try though

I didn’t think I had to because it’s so obvious. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort owed Deripaska $10 million but was working for the Trump campaign for free and offering Deripaska private briefings.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Additionally, Mitch McConnell blocked a Senate bill sanctioning Deripaska’s company, allowing it to open a facility in Kentucky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-a-mcconnell-backed-effort-to-lift-russian-sanctions-boosted-a-kentucky-project/2019/08/13/72b26e00-b97c-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html

Now cite whatever TF you’re talking about, and not using Tony Bobolinski who Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal found to be not credible. TIA!


Awwww... bless your little heart!

Did Deripaska's son get a college recommendation letter from Trump like Joe did for Li? Did Deripaska have a key to Trump Tower like Li did for Bidens office in Georgetown after leaving the VP office? As for the WSJ, didn't know they're the authority on Tony Bobolinski who was interviewed for 5 hours by the FBI (and committed perjury per Rupert Murdoch)

Meanwhile when will Hunter pay back the $2 million to Kevin Morris for his back taxes?

Noticing that you haven’t cited anything.


Bobulinski, who was about to lose his house because he was on the hook to pay $600k because of FRAUD he committed - and magically the money appeared right as he spoke out about the big "10 for the big guy" deal - which we now know didn't actually happen. And even more curious was the fact that Bobulinski's "corroborating evidence" was screenshots from an iPhone that were being displayed on a blackberry with a cracked screen which at the top showed it was connected to 'MTS RUS' which is a RUSSIAN cellphone provider.



But then you keep insisting we're insane for any notion whatsoever of there being a Russian connection here?


Sketchy Bobulinski, gets himself in a bunch of trouble, has to pay a lot of money. Turns up out of nowhere, obviously in Russia, provides sketchy "evidence" against Biden, makes a few statements and appearances, inexplicably all of his deep financial problems get paid off and go away, after which, Bobulinski fades away as well.

"Nothing to see here..." Riiiiiiiight. Stinks to high heaven.

+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs.
Anonymous
+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs.


Which media has tried to get an interview? They sure showed no interest in 2020 election cycle.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs.


Which media has tried to get an interview? They sure showed no interest in 2020 election cycle.


Precisely.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs.


Which media has tried to get an interview? They sure showed no interest in 2020 election cycle.

Dan Abrams of ABC News has asked him for interviews multiple times and he has refused.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs.


Which media has tried to get an interview? They sure showed no interest in 2020 election cycle.

Dan Abrams of ABC News has asked him for interviews multiple times and he has refused.


He can't, because the deal was for him to serve as an October Surprise, get paid, and then move on.
Anonymous
Grassley admitted yesterday to Newsmax’s Greta Van Susteren that he has no evidence to back his claim.

"It is a very serious allegation. I wish I could say that I knew it was true or untrue," the 89-year-old lawmaker told Van Susteren.
https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-grassley-biden-bribery-allegation-untrue-1798671

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Grassley admitted yesterday to Newsmax’s Greta Van Susteren that he has no evidence to back his claim.

"It is a very serious allegation. I wish I could say that I knew it was true or untrue," the 89-year-old lawmaker told Van Susteren.
https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-grassley-biden-bribery-allegation-untrue-1798671


From the article : ‘seems to imply’ is one phrase that jumped out at me. The other is a portion of the interview was tweeted.

Then there’s this:

Given the precise nature of the information provided by department whistleblowers with a high degree of credibility, we're confident that the FBI has had these significant allegations for some time now," Taylor Foy, communications director for Grassley, told Newsweek on Friday. "The question is what did the FBI do with that information. That's what Senator Grassley would like to illuminate."


So yes, the proper to do is consider them allegations until investigated thoroughly
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like all those foreign governments and actors paying the Biden family might have expected something for their money beyond photo ops and invitations.


Right wing lies. Payments for influence are legal.


It is legal for a foreign country to pay the VP of the US to get favorable policies? Really? Is their a cap on how much they can pay?


Actually it is almost certainly legal. Under McDonnell v. US, it is only illegal if the bribe is paid in exchange for an "official act" and "official act" means a "formal exercise of governmental power." Setting up a meeting or urging some other official to do something doesn't count. And since the VP has no formal power at all over foreign policy, he could not possibly have done an "official act."


Really?



He had no formal power to do that. He may have advised Obama to order it or something. But the VP can't do that on his own authority. If you think otherwise, cite the statute giving him that power.


We shall see now, won't we? And, I have heard this is part of what this whistleblower's complaint is about.


The whistleblower is a MAGA insurrectionist. Who cares what the traitor has to say?


+1 “whistleblowers” are troublemakers with agendas and need to be jailed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like all those foreign governments and actors paying the Biden family might have expected something for their money beyond photo ops and invitations.


Right wing lies. Payments for influence are legal.


It is legal for a foreign country to pay the VP of the US to get favorable policies? Really? Is their a cap on how much they can pay?


Actually it is almost certainly legal. Under McDonnell v. US, it is only illegal if the bribe is paid in exchange for an "official act" and "official act" means a "formal exercise of governmental power." Setting up a meeting or urging some other official to do something doesn't count. And since the VP has no formal power at all over foreign policy, he could not possibly have done an "official act."


Really?



He had no formal power to do that. He may have advised Obama to order it or something. But the VP can't do that on his own authority. If you think otherwise, cite the statute giving him that power.


We shall see now, won't we? And, I have heard this is part of what this whistleblower's complaint is about.


The whistleblower is a MAGA insurrectionist. Who cares what the traitor has to say?


+1 “whistleblowers” are troublemakers with agendas and need to be jailed.


Amazing how whistleblowers are suddenly "out of vogue" with the left.
Whistleblowers who lie can suffer the same fate as anyone who lies to Congress - imprisonment.
From all accounts, this whistleblower is credible.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: