
Tucker Carlson’s son got a college recommendation letter from Hunter himself. That’s serious weak sauce. |
Noticing that you haven’t cited anything. |
Bobulinski, who was about to lose his house because he was on the hook to pay $600k because of FRAUD he committed - and magically the money appeared right as he spoke out about the big "10 for the big guy" deal - which we now know didn't actually happen. And even more curious was the fact that Bobulinski's "corroborating evidence" was screenshots from an iPhone that were being displayed on a blackberry with a cracked screen which at the top showed it was connected to 'MTS RUS' which is a RUSSIAN cellphone provider. But then you keep insisting we're insane for any notion whatsoever of there being a Russian connection here? |
Sketchy Bobulinski, gets himself in a bunch of trouble, has to pay a lot of money. Turns up out of nowhere, obviously in Russia, provides sketchy "evidence" against Biden, makes a few statements and appearances, inexplicably all of his deep financial problems get paid off and go away, after which, Bobulinski fades away as well. "Nothing to see here..." Riiiiiiiight. Stinks to high heaven. |
+1 And he refuses to give interviews to any media other than RWNJs. |
Which media has tried to get an interview? They sure showed no interest in 2020 election cycle. |
Precisely. |
Dan Abrams of ABC News has asked him for interviews multiple times and he has refused. |
He can't, because the deal was for him to serve as an October Surprise, get paid, and then move on. |
Grassley admitted yesterday to Newsmax’s Greta Van Susteren that he has no evidence to back his claim.
"It is a very serious allegation. I wish I could say that I knew it was true or untrue," the 89-year-old lawmaker told Van Susteren. https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-grassley-biden-bribery-allegation-untrue-1798671 |
From the article : ‘seems to imply’ is one phrase that jumped out at me. The other is a portion of the interview was tweeted. Then there’s this: Given the precise nature of the information provided by department whistleblowers with a high degree of credibility, we're confident that the FBI has had these significant allegations for some time now," Taylor Foy, communications director for Grassley, told Newsweek on Friday. "The question is what did the FBI do with that information. That's what Senator Grassley would like to illuminate." So yes, the proper to do is consider them allegations until investigated thoroughly |