Are privates that don’t offer merit aid still enrolling the best students?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

Haven't you been reading these boards? There are more than enough bright students to go around.

One outcome may be that parents will learn how to save, starting at birth, instead of depending on the overpayment and generosity of others to fund their merit aid pools. Perhaps also have a family size you can afford the education of.

Some of us do and still cannot afford $85K a year. We had one child. Saved since birth. Bought a small sh@t shack (as in under 1000) square feet in a not so great neighborhood. So, our kid knows they can go to a school we can afford. Simple.

Nothing wrong with that. It's what should happen for all kids. Attend somewhere that's affordable to you. No reason to go into debt beyond the $27K federal max for student loans.

That's beside the point. After working hard, saving, the kids killing themselves in HS . . . they shouldn't have to. It should be affordable for all, not just the rich and the poor. Your condescending lecture on the issue notwithstanding.

It's affordable to anyone who made it their #1 priority. You didn't, and you absolutely cannot stop your teeth-gnashing and triyng to make that everyone else's problem. If your kid is so worthy that is is huge injustice, take out parent plus loans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

It is an intriguing question. The demographics at the elite colleges have changed significantly in the last 20 years and what are the long term implications of this?

There were already kids turning down Ivies for full rides at state universities or just attending a much cheaper flagship honors program in the past. But I can easily see how this would be far more kids now than 20 years ago due to the rise of the donut hole families. I do think that Ivy prestige has steadily weakened over time, they no longer have the perceived lock on the best and brightest, especially as the professional classes now really understands the cost/benefit analysis, and also that Ivy admission is hardly meritocratic and is based on very different factors that have little to do with achievement. And others are less impressed by the behaviors and attitudes of elite college grads, fair or not, especially with cancel culture and the growth of rigid ideological outlooks that these schools have embraced (with some exceptions, like Chicago). Then we do have that there are many more best and brightest chasing after a limited number of spots, which actually means they end up being dispersed among a wider range of schools.

All in all, I am no longer "impressed" when I see an elite college decal on a car. I do think nice kid, bit lucky, and not much more than that. When evaluating candidates, if I notice their college on the resumes, I don't give weight to elite college grads over lesser college grads once above a certain threshold. What they actually did is much more important, along with impression in the interviews. Having said that, the Ivies will still produce genuinely impressive graduates who go on to achieve great things, but this is probably no more than 1/4 - 1/3 of their student body, with the rest not really meaningfully different from comparable students at UVA or College Park or Vanderbilt or whatever.

Where did you get your 1/4-1/3 stat?

FWIW, people have been turning down Ivies due to cost for more than 20 years. This isn't a new phenomenon.

The gulf in price between Ivies & state schools has exploded over the past 20 years. Lots of state schools have frozen tuition or let you lock in your tuition for all four years the year you enroll.

Yeah, but there were still kids with middle class parents turning down the Ivies in the '80s because the parents couldn't afford that tuition. The group may be larger now than then, but this isn't new though may be to you.

True. My brother and I were among them. Also most of the top students at my middle class suburban high school didn't even bother applying to schools they knew they couldn't afford because even the application fee was too much to pay for a lottery ticket.

When I graduated from high school in 1980, the mantra was that if you could get into a school, you could find a way to attend. At that time the tuition, room, and board at the NESCAC school I attended cost about $8K. Many of my middle and upper-middle class New England high school classmates went to private schools, as well.

I contributed about $2K/year towards the cost from summer earnings, covered my own books and miscellaneous expenses, took out a student loan for $1500-$2K/year, and my parents paid the rest. They did this for all six of their kids at private schools, paying over time (not in a lump sum) under arrangements with each school. It was a stretch for them relative to what the state flagship would have been, but it was doable, and the modest low-interest student debt we incurred was manageable.

The year I went abroad, the tuition cost $800 because the program was at the European university through an American school. My room and board was $300 a month. My parents saved a lot of money that year relative to what they would have paid for my on-campus costs.

Fast-forward, the same NESCAC school now costs $86K/year. A family like the one I grew up in could never in a million years pull off what my parents did.

Apples and oranges.

Yes, very common. I entered college @ ~$6000/year and graduated at ~$13,000 four years later.

But how did you pull down 2000 in a summer when minimum wage was 3.10 in 1980 and 3.35 starting in 1981? Twelve weeks @ 3.10/hour x 40 hours = $1488. Very few folks i knew were able to land a job for much more than minimum wage but may have also been due to the region of the country.

That was my thought too! I worked two jobs every summer and didn't make that much in the 80s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does this thread feel like sour grapes for those who can not afford to attend the Ivy they are qualified to attend?
Ivy level schools will not ever hurt for students of the highest caliber. There is way more qualified applicants than seats at those schools. If your child can not attend such a highly rated school that is fine and your child will do well wherever they attend but the T30 schools will still have an overabundance of the top qualified students to choose from. Parents have always looked at their children with bias thinking they are more unique than they really are.

+1000

There will also be "donut hole" families who have managed to save/make saving for education a priority. Schools like Harvard make it affordable for families making up to 150-200K. So while your family making 150-200K may not choose to save, there will still be plenty who do, so it will not be all "low income" and wealthy students.

Then again, it's the wealthy students who largely have the means to do the pointy ECs and win national awards, and have tutors to take 13+APs and still get all As. So the wealthy have an easier path to "having the resume for HYPSM

Oh please. Not all donut hold families can save $80/year per kid. Esp in high COLA areas where their jobs are. Between medical, taxes, child care early on, expenses associated with school, car payments (on very basic cars, no suburbans or Teslas here), mortgage (still in our starter home). . . . it's just not possible for two stable paid, but not wealthy, civil servants (non-SES).

So it is sour grapes. That doesn't mean that those families, like us, are wrong.

This. In Fairfax county, teacher and police officers are donut hole.

Can someone put a $$$ amount of income that they define as donut hole?

Go to any Ivy League expected cost calculator. Input a $300k income with $100,000 in a 529, $100,000 in house equity, etc....and every school says they will give you like $25k-$30k (Princeton was highest at like $40k) per year. That is if you only have 1 kid attending...I assume they will give you more with multiple. Again, if you are getting a free ride vs. even a net cost of $50k you will probably take it.

How much do two Fairfax county teachers make? More than $300k?

Are the expected cost calculators lying, or are people defining a donut-hole income as something very high...where no one else would ever define it that high.

Aid starts phasing out at about 150k. I define it as between that number and somewhere in the mid 200s. The number is probably lower in a loc col area, but two teachers living in Fairfax are going to spend a large amount of their income on housing, so even with $180k combined, they won't be able to save like a lawyer in Abingdon making the same salary

But the aid for two teachers making $180k is substantial enough that the price of an Ivy league is equivalent to in-state (may be less)...assuming no in-state merit aid. So, those two teachers will have a tough time paying for any school I guess you are saying.

We're near this number and get no aid instate, and a bit at some of the SLACs that our kid wanted, but not enough to even bring it close to in state

Which is fine. I don't think the goal is to make it almost the same as in-state. It's to make it attainable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

It is an intriguing question. The demographics at the elite colleges have changed significantly in the last 20 years and what are the long term implications of this?

There were already kids turning down Ivies for full rides at state universities or just attending a much cheaper flagship honors program in the past. But I can easily see how this would be far more kids now than 20 years ago due to the rise of the donut hole families. I do think that Ivy prestige has steadily weakened over time, they no longer have the perceived lock on the best and brightest, especially as the professional classes now really understands the cost/benefit analysis, and also that Ivy admission is hardly meritocratic and is based on very different factors that have little to do with achievement. And others are less impressed by the behaviors and attitudes of elite college grads, fair or not, especially with cancel culture and the growth of rigid ideological outlooks that these schools have embraced (with some exceptions, like Chicago). Then we do have that there are many more best and brightest chasing after a limited number of spots, which actually means they end up being dispersed among a wider range of schools.

All in all, I am no longer "impressed" when I see an elite college decal on a car. I do think nice kid, bit lucky, and not much more than that. When evaluating candidates, if I notice their college on the resumes, I don't give weight to elite college grads over lesser college grads once above a certain threshold. What they actually did is much more important, along with impression in the interviews. Having said that, the Ivies will still produce genuinely impressive graduates who go on to achieve great things, but this is probably no more than 1/4 - 1/3 of their student body, with the rest not really meaningfully different from comparable students at UVA or College Park or Vanderbilt or whatever.

I agree. Malcolm Gladwell makes the case that companies should hire from the top 1/3 of any school. I know people here will disagree and I invite you to go watch his talk on this topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

It is an intriguing question. The demographics at the elite colleges have changed significantly in the last 20 years and what are the long term implications of this?

There were already kids turning down Ivies for full rides at state universities or just attending a much cheaper flagship honors program in the past. But I can easily see how this would be far more kids now than 20 years ago due to the rise of the donut hole families. I do think that Ivy prestige has steadily weakened over time, they no longer have the perceived lock on the best and brightest, especially as the professional classes now really understands the cost/benefit analysis, and also that Ivy admission is hardly meritocratic and is based on very different factors that have little to do with achievement. And others are less impressed by the behaviors and attitudes of elite college grads, fair or not, especially with cancel culture and the growth of rigid ideological outlooks that these schools have embraced (with some exceptions, like Chicago). Then we do have that there are many more best and brightest chasing after a limited number of spots, which actually means they end up being dispersed among a wider range of schools.

All in all, I am no longer "impressed" when I see an elite college decal on a car. I do think nice kid, bit lucky, and not much more than that. When evaluating candidates, if I notice their college on the resumes, I don't give weight to elite college grads over lesser college grads once above a certain threshold. What they actually did is much more important, along with impression in the interviews. Having said that, the Ivies will still produce genuinely impressive graduates who go on to achieve great things, but this is probably no more than 1/4 - 1/3 of their student body, with the rest not really meaningfully different from comparable students at UVA or College Park or Vanderbilt or whatever.

I agree. Malcolm Gladwell makes the case that companies should hire from the top 1/3 of any school. I know people here will disagree and I invite you to go watch his talk on this topic.

Then you should go listen to the absolutely brutal takedown of Gladwell on the podcast If Books Could Kill. They really outted him as a hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

Haven't you been reading these boards? There are more than enough bright students to go around.

One outcome may be that parents will learn how to save, starting at birth, instead of depending on the overpayment and generosity of others to fund their merit aid pools. Perhaps also have a family size you can afford the education of.

Some of us do and still cannot afford $85K a year. We had one child. Saved since birth. Bought a small sh@t shack (as in under 1000) square feet in a not so great neighborhood. So, our kid knows they can go to a school we can afford. Simple.

Nothing wrong with that. It's what should happen for all kids. Attend somewhere that's affordable to you. No reason to go into debt beyond the $27K federal max for student loans.

That's beside the point. After working hard, saving, the kids killing themselves in HS . . . they shouldn't have to. It should be affordable for all, not just the rich and the poor. Your condescending lecture on the issue notwithstanding.

It's affordable to anyone who made it their #1 priority. You didn't, and you absolutely cannot stop your teeth-gnashing and triyng to make that everyone else's problem. If your kid is so worthy that is is huge injustice, take out parent plus loans.

+1

But don't complain later that you need those loans to disappear. All thru life, we make choices. Daily I choose to buy things, eat things, drive things, wear things, etc that are AFFORDABLE to me. If I want private K-12 for my kid, then it is up to me to make changes in my life so WE can afford it. If not, I live in the best area I can manage to afford and send my kid to those public schools. For K-12, only NINE percent of kids attend private schools. The remaining 91% attend public schools.

Same goes for college. There are plenty of excellent choices that can be affordable. Unfortunately, the T25 are mostly 75-80K+/year and may not be attainable for some people. However, in reality, the majority of people simply won't be able to gain admission in the first place. So why worry yourself about something so far fetched, when you can instead plan to find a great school for your kid(s) that is affordable. Just because you "work so hard for 4 years during HS and have a 1600/4.0UW" does NOT entitle you to that education for free. nobody is saying you cannot get an education. Just saying if you cannot afford the $80K schools, there are literally hundreds of affordable excellent schools out there for your kid to attend. If you choose to go into debt for it, that is your issue not anyone else's. But you are NOT entitled to attend an elite school just because you got in. If it was that important to you, then you had 18 years to make plans and adjust your lifestyle to accommodate that. I'd argue that it's not worth it if you have to struggle to save the $320K for 4 years of college---pick a great school where your kid gets merit and it's only $40K/year and go there and never look back. Attitude is a huge part of how successful one will be in life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

It is an intriguing question. The demographics at the elite colleges have changed significantly in the last 20 years and what are the long term implications of this?

There were already kids turning down Ivies for full rides at state universities or just attending a much cheaper flagship honors program in the past. But I can easily see how this would be far more kids now than 20 years ago due to the rise of the donut hole families. I do think that Ivy prestige has steadily weakened over time, they no longer have the perceived lock on the best and brightest, especially as the professional classes now really understands the cost/benefit analysis, and also that Ivy admission is hardly meritocratic and is based on very different factors that have little to do with achievement. And others are less impressed by the behaviors and attitudes of elite college grads, fair or not, especially with cancel culture and the growth of rigid ideological outlooks that these schools have embraced (with some exceptions, like Chicago). Then we do have that there are many more best and brightest chasing after a limited number of spots, which actually means they end up being dispersed among a wider range of schools.

All in all, I am no longer "impressed" when I see an elite college decal on a car. I do think nice kid, bit lucky, and not much more than that. When evaluating candidates, if I notice their college on the resumes, I don't give weight to elite college grads over lesser college grads once above a certain threshold. What they actually did is much more important, along with impression in the interviews. Having said that, the Ivies will still produce genuinely impressive graduates who go on to achieve great things, but this is probably no more than 1/4 - 1/3 of their student body, with the rest not really meaningfully different from comparable students at UVA or College Park or Vanderbilt or whatever.

I agree. Malcolm Gladwell makes the case that companies should hire from the top 1/3 of any school. I know people here will disagree and I invite you to go watch his talk on this topic.

In almost all situations, the smart, motivated, hard working kids will rise to the top. I'd think it's much easier to do that at a school where you are at 85-90 percentile vs being at a Harvard where everyone is similar smarts and 85% are highly motivated type A personalities. IN reality, most kids will get a better education where they can "rise to the top".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

Haven't you been reading these boards? There are more than enough bright students to go around.

One outcome may be that parents will learn how to save, starting at birth, instead of depending on the overpayment and generosity of others to fund their merit aid pools. Perhaps also have a family size you can afford the education of.

Some of us do and still cannot afford $85K a year. We had one child. Saved since birth. Bought a small sh@t shack (as in under 1000) square feet in a not so great neighborhood. So, our kid knows they can go to a school we can afford. Simple.

Nothing wrong with that. It's what should happen for all kids. Attend somewhere that's affordable to you. No reason to go into debt beyond the $27K federal max for student loans.

That's beside the point. After working hard, saving, the kids killing themselves in HS . . . they shouldn't have to. It should be affordable for all, not just the rich and the poor. Your condescending lecture on the issue notwithstanding.

It's affordable to anyone who made it their #1 priority. You didn't, and you absolutely cannot stop your teeth-gnashing and triyng to make that everyone else's problem. If your kid is so worthy that is is huge injustice, take out parent plus loans.

You will still be yammering on like this when college costs a million dollars a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

It is an intriguing question. The demographics at the elite colleges have changed significantly in the last 20 years and what are the long term implications of this?

There were already kids turning down Ivies for full rides at state universities or just attending a much cheaper flagship honors program in the past. But I can easily see how this would be far more kids now than 20 years ago due to the rise of the donut hole families. I do think that Ivy prestige has steadily weakened over time, they no longer have the perceived lock on the best and brightest, especially as the professional classes now really understands the cost/benefit analysis, and also that Ivy admission is hardly meritocratic and is based on very different factors that have little to do with achievement. And others are less impressed by the behaviors and attitudes of elite college grads, fair or not, especially with cancel culture and the growth of rigid ideological outlooks that these schools have embraced (with some exceptions, like Chicago). Then we do have that there are many more best and brightest chasing after a limited number of spots, which actually means they end up being dispersed among a wider range of schools.

All in all, I am no longer "impressed" when I see an elite college decal on a car. I do think nice kid, bit lucky, and not much more than that. When evaluating candidates, if I notice their college on the resumes, I don't give weight to elite college grads over lesser college grads once above a certain threshold. What they actually did is much more important, along with impression in the interviews. Having said that, the Ivies will still produce genuinely impressive graduates who go on to achieve great things, but this is probably no more than 1/4 - 1/3 of their student body, with the rest not really meaningfully different from comparable students at UVA or College Park or Vanderbilt or whatever.

I agree. Malcolm Gladwell makes the case that companies should hire from the top 1/3 of any school. I know people here will disagree and I invite you to go watch his talk on this topic.

Then you should go listen to the absolutely brutal takedown of Gladwell on the podcast If Books Could Kill. They really outted him as a hack.

The podcaster who thinks Bari Weiss has anything useful to say? No thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid is turning down an Ivy that’s $85k/year for a full ride at a flagship. According to my kid, they are far from the only one of their classmates making such a decision. Kids talk.

What are the consequences to this as the years go on & so many top students can’t afford elite privates?

Haven't you been reading these boards? There are more than enough bright students to go around.

One outcome may be that parents will learn how to save, starting at birth, instead of depending on the overpayment and generosity of others to fund their merit aid pools. Perhaps also have a family size you can afford the education of.

Some of us do and still cannot afford $85K a year. We had one child. Saved since birth. Bought a small sh@t shack (as in under 1000) square feet in a not so great neighborhood. So, our kid knows they can go to a school we can afford. Simple.

Nothing wrong with that. It's what should happen for all kids. Attend somewhere that's affordable to you. No reason to go into debt beyond the $27K federal max for student loans.

That's beside the point. After working hard, saving, the kids killing themselves in HS . . . they shouldn't have to. It should be affordable for all, not just the rich and the poor. Your condescending lecture on the issue notwithstanding.

It's affordable to anyone who made it their #1 priority. You didn't, and you absolutely cannot stop your teeth-gnashing and triyng to make that everyone else's problem. If your kid is so worthy that is is huge injustice, take out parent plus loans.

You will still be yammering on like this when college costs a million dollars a year.

+100000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does this thread feel like sour grapes for those who can not afford to attend the Ivy they are qualified to attend?
Ivy level schools will not ever hurt for students of the highest caliber. There is way more qualified applicants than seats at those schools. If your child can not attend such a highly rated school that is fine and your child will do well wherever they attend but the T30 schools will still have an overabundance of the top qualified students to choose from. Parents have always looked at their children with bias thinking they are more unique than they really are.

What this thread doesn't tell you is that it's not unusual for ivy kids to turn down full-rides from state schools.

That is correct, my kid did that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does this thread feel like sour grapes for those who can not afford to attend the Ivy they are qualified to attend?
Ivy level schools will not ever hurt for students of the highest caliber. There is way more qualified applicants than seats at those schools. If your child can not attend such a highly rated school that is fine and your child will do well wherever they attend but the T30 schools will still have an overabundance of the top qualified students to choose from. Parents have always looked at their children with bias thinking they are more unique than they really are.

What this thread doesn't tell you is that it's not unusual for ivy kids to turn down full-rides from state schools.

Correct, if you’re rich or poor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does this thread feel like sour grapes for those who can not afford to attend the Ivy they are qualified to attend?
Ivy level schools will not ever hurt for students of the highest caliber. There is way more qualified applicants than seats at those schools. If your child can not attend such a highly rated school that is fine and your child will do well wherever they attend but the T30 schools will still have an overabundance of the top qualified students to choose from. Parents have always looked at their children with bias thinking they are more unique than they really are.

+1000

There will also be "donut hole" families who have managed to save/make saving for education a priority. Schools like Harvard make it affordable for families making up to 150-200K. So while your family making 150-200K may not choose to save, there will still be plenty who do, so it will not be all "low income" and wealthy students.

Then again, it's the wealthy students who largely have the means to do the pointy ECs and win national awards, and have tutors to take 13+APs and still get all As. So the wealthy have an easier path to "having the resume for HYPSM

Oh please. Not all donut hold families can save $80/year per kid. Esp in high COLA areas where their jobs are. Between medical, taxes, child care early on, expenses associated with school, car payments (on very basic cars, no suburbans or Teslas here), mortgage (still in our starter home). . . . it's just not possible for two stable paid, but not wealthy, civil servants (non-SES).

So it is sour grapes. That doesn't mean that those families, like us, are wrong.

This. In Fairfax county, teacher and police officers are donut hole.

Can someone put a $$$ amount of income that they define as donut hole?

Go to any Ivy League expected cost calculator. Input a $300k income with $100,000 in a 529, $100,000 in house equity, etc....and every school says they will give you like $25k-$30k (Princeton was highest at like $40k) per year. That is if you only have 1 kid attending...I assume they will give you more with multiple. Again, if you are getting a free ride vs. even a net cost of $50k you will probably take it.

How much do two Fairfax county teachers make? More than $300k?

Are the expected cost calculators lying, or are people defining a donut-hole income as something very high...where no one else would ever define it that high.

The people who call themselves donut holes are firmly in the top quartile. This is a group that is over represented at top schools. I’ll take the individual at their word—the price is to high—but for every family saying that, there’s a family with the same finances who is ready and willing to pay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At our MCPS high school, so many of the top kids going to UMD. If pre-med, they’re saving for med school. CS kids doing the math. It’s a donut hole community in terms of family salaries.

Yes. It’s insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’s freshman retention rate now mirrors Auburn’s.

Years ago, the top students went to top privates. Tuition wasn’t crazy even if you were full pay. Most state flagships & privates (incl. UMD, Tulane, UMiami, UMass Amherst) were for slackers & partiers.

Yes.. my kid got nothing at T 20. It’s unaffordable. Going to the former party school now with the rest of the smarty pants.