Another Democrat switches parties to GOP

[Anonymous]

You believe that Rs are racist because that is what you have repeatedly been told with no proof at all.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

What;s her position on abortion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You believe that Rs are racist because that is what you have repeatedly been told with no proof at all.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!

+1

I base my feeling that Republicans are racist on my eyes and ears. Tuberville if you need one recent example.

[Anonymous]

It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:'I didn’t leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left ME when it embraced left-wing radicalism, lawlessness, and put the interests of illegal aliens over the interest of Americans. I have nothing to apologize for.'

from her speech

Good to see that there is some hope for this country, more and more people are recognizing that the progressives, like lemmings are following one another over the cliff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:'I didn’t leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left ME when it embraced left-wing radicalism, lawlessness, and put the interests of illegal aliens over the interest of Americans. I have nothing to apologize for.'

from her speech

It’s bullshit, though. The Democratic Party is no different today than when she ran and was elected as a Democrat. That is the same speech party-switchers have been giving since the 1960s. Everyone of them switched because they were promised some position or status or cronyism benefits by Republicans. Most of them have short political careers after switching because nobody trusts them.

I disagree. I think the Democratic Party of the past two years in particular has gone off the deep end in some respects. In particular it feels like they’ve adopted the party platform of extremists.

School choice is just not that much of a radical concept. It’s been around forever as an idea and in a lot of the country, Democrats themselves were fine with it, and able to live with it if they weren’t fine with it. But now it’s one of the third rail topics, I guess because a lot of politicians are actively courting teacher unions for donations. Idk why, to be honest, because even that isn’t new. But now, Democratic candidates that talk about school choice face significant internal party consequences and possible loss of party support. It is a change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:'I didn’t leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left ME when it embraced left-wing radicalism, lawlessness, and put the interests of illegal aliens over the interest of Americans. I have nothing to apologize for.'

from her speech

It’s bullshit, though. The Democratic Party is no different today than when she ran and was elected as a Democrat. That is the same speech party-switchers have been giving since the 1960s. Everyone of them switched because they were promised some position or status or cronyism benefits by Republicans. Most of them have short political careers after switching because nobody trusts them.

I disagree. I think the Democratic Party of the past two years in particular has gone off the deep end in some respects. In particular it feels like they’ve adopted the party platform of extremists.

School choice is just not that much of a radical concept. It’s been around forever as an idea and in a lot of the country, Democrats themselves were fine with it, and able to live with it if they weren’t fine with it. But now it’s one of the third rail topics, I guess because a lot of politicians are actively courting teacher unions for donations. Idk why, to be honest, because even that isn’t new. But now, Democratic candidates that talk about school choice face significant internal party consequences and possible loss of party support. It is a change.

Democrats have not changed in the past two years. You have lost your mind. If a legislator can’t take a little criticism and come back with a defense and justification for their vote they should get out of politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

She cites the Democrats' positions on crime, school choice, and immigration - all of which are proving negative positions for black Americans. She is representing the voters in HER district - which has a large black population. She wants better for her voters and they are not getting that with the Democrats.

This is a wake up call for the Democrats. If her voters don't think she is acting in their best interest, they will vote her out. But, I would not be at all surprised if they reelect her again...... she is speaking up for them and will have a big voice with the Republicans in GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

She cites the Democrats' positions on crime, school choice, and immigration - all of which are proving negative positions for black Americans. She is representing the voters in HER district - which has a large black population. She wants better for her voters and they are not getting that with the Democrats.

This is a wake up call for the Democrats. If her voters don't think she is acting in their best interest, they will vote her out. But, I would not be at all surprised if they reelect her again...... she is speaking up for them and will have a big voice with the Republicans in GA.

I agree with this. I think she has a reasonable chance of re-election. It should be a wake-up call, but somehow I think it won’t be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You believe that Rs are racist because that is what you have repeatedly been told with no proof at all.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!

+1

I base my feeling that Republicans are racist on my eyes and ears. Tuberville if you need one recent example.

Laugh all you want.
Let me remind you that this is a black woman leaving the Democrats and becoming a Republican. In the south.
It speaks volumes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What;s her position on abortion?

It doesn't matter. There are other Republicans who support legal abortion.
Which is VERY different from Democrats. Any Democrat who is pro-life is villainized and not welcomed in the Democrat Party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

[…]

No, it says she’s either incredibly stupid or someone with deep pockets was able to make it worth her time. You RWNJ are really enjoying the narrative that Oh My GoD tHe DeMoCrAtS aRe So CrAzY lOoK hOw MaNy ArE lEaViNg. It’s not real. It’s dark money. The kind of money the GOP thrives on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

[…]

No, it says she’s either incredibly stupid or someone with deep pockets was able to make it worth her time. You RWNJ are really enjoying the narrative that Oh My GoD tHe DeMoCrAtS aRe So CrAzY lOoK hOw MaNy ArE lEaViNg. It’s not real. It’s dark money. The kind of money the GOP thrives on.

Dark money, you say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

[…]

No, it says she’s either incredibly stupid or someone with deep pockets was able to make it worth her time. You RWNJ are really enjoying the narrative that Oh My GoD tHe DeMoCrAtS aRe So CrAzY lOoK hOw MaNy ArE lEaViNg. It’s not real. It’s dark money. The kind of money the GOP thrives on.

LOL. You remind me of a kid with his fingers in his ears yelling "La la la la la la!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fraud.

And as such, voters should have legal recourse, or there should be a legal mechanism for automatically dealing with this. If a majority of voters vote for a member of Party X to be elected, and he wins, but switches to Party Y, he should be able to be recalled if not have his term automatically invalidated. And all donors should have their money returned to them.

She got paid. This is a Sinema type deal. Cashing out to get into the right-wing grift network.

BS. She is from a district that Biden won by 89%. She is taking a great risk at making this move. That tells me she has thought long and hard about her move.

[…]

No, it says she’s either incredibly stupid or someone with deep pockets was able to make it worth her time. You RWNJ are really enjoying the narrative that Oh My GoD tHe DeMoCrAtS aRe So CrAzY lOoK hOw MaNy ArE lEaViNg. It’s not real. It’s dark money. The kind of money the GOP thrives on.