Another Democrat switches parties to GOP

[Anonymous]

Tactical brilliance? No, pure evil

[Anonymous]

She will be personally sued and she will lose

Dems are stupid they suck st vetting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Already mentioned that Strom Thurmand was a Democrat, who became Republican in 1964, year of the Civil Rights Act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Yes, before the southern strategy and the major shift in the southern, racist block from the Dems to the GOP.

Abe Lincoln would be a democrat today.

Actually, every president but Trump would be a democrat today, alas.

Not so much. The party switchers understand that the Republican Party has achieved managed democracy. You can say people are furious about abortion and shootings and whatever, but it doesn’t matter if they don’t get to vote. Republican judges, money, and just strategic and tactical brilliance have outflanked the Dems at every turn.

When one side literally has the guns, the ammunition and the money, it doesn’t matter how many people they have on their side. They just need enough foot soldiers to use those guns. And Donald Trump has given us those foot soldiers.

The smart play is to become a Republican, and get on record now.

You seem awfully excited about fascism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So here are people who look at the White Nationalist Christian fundementalist group and say "I want to be a part of that"

Good riddance.

Your post gives a clue as to why this may be happening.
When you demonize the opponent with false smears and hateful rhetoric and all the while embrace absolutely nutty positions on issues (abortion on demand with no restrictions, allowing biological males to compete against women, restricting speech, defunding the police, etc.), expect reasonable people to run away from you. Now, you might say that ALL Democrats don't embrace the positions listed - but how many Democrats have spoken out against them?

THIS ^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The unrepentant segregationists and anti-civil rights politicians also left the Democrats in the 1960s-1970’s and switched to the Republicans. Good riddance.

Your shtick is tired and boring. No one takes you seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republican Party is the party of insurrectionist and traitors. The party is happy to take on more who think the same way.

You should really create a desktop calendar with your once-a-day cliches and melodramatic claims. I'm sure there's a market for it... somewhere...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Already mentioned that Strom Thurmand was a Democrat, who became Republican in 1964, year of the Civil Rights Act.

The post wasn't talking about Strom, but a different Senator who was feted by other Senators like Chris Dodd. 'There is no time in history that couldn't have used him, World War 2, the Civil War'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The unrepentant segregationists and anti-civil rights politicians also left the Democrats in the 1960s-1970’s and switched to the Republicans. Good riddance.

Your shtick is tired and boring. No one takes you seriously.

Hit a nerve! Because it’s factual history you can’t deny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Already mentioned that Strom Thurmand was a Democrat, who became Republican in 1964, year of the Civil Rights Act.

The post wasn't talking about Strom, but a different Senator who was feted by other Senators like Chris Dodd. 'There is no time in history that couldn't have used him, World War 2, the Civil War'.

But Thurmond was a lifelong racist who like other racist Democrats found a home in the GOP when the Democrats embraced civil rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The unrepentant segregationists and anti-civil rights politicians also left the Democrats in the 1960s-1970’s and switched to the Republicans. Good riddance.

Your shtick is tired and boring. No one takes you seriously.

Uhh...but it is quite true, though, isn't it, Cletus?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will be personally sued and she will lose

Dems are stupid they suck st vetting

George Santos says "hold my beer"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The unrepentant segregationists and anti-civil rights politicians also left the Democrats in the 1960s-1970’s and switched to the Republicans. Good riddance.

Your shtick is tired and boring. No one takes you seriously.

Except it is the truth. history matters. Education matters. Except to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Already mentioned that Strom Thurmand was a Democrat, who became Republican in 1964, year of the Civil Rights Act.

The post wasn't talking about Strom, but a different Senator who was feted by other Senators like Chris Dodd. 'There is no time in history that couldn't have used him, World War 2, the Civil War'.

Yes, that other senator, Byrd from WVA, disavowed his time as a klansman and help pass important civil rights legislation through the end of his careers - as a democrat. He didn't switch parties like the other southern dems, like thurmond.

Face it, the GOP today is the segregationalist party of the 1850-1950's...and for all of the manipulation the GOP takes - gerrymandering, voter suppression, running astrotruf third party candidates to dilute left votes (see Sinema and Jill Stein to name two) at the end of the day, the GOP will not be able to overcome this:

So, in actuality, switching parties may pay off over the next two years, but if the under 30 counteract the over 65 vote, then the Dems win easily for the next several cycles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to forget the actual Klansman was a member of the Democratic party

Already mentioned that Strom Thurmand was a Democrat, who became Republican in 1964, year of the Civil Rights Act.

The post wasn't talking about Strom, but a different Senator who was feted by other Senators like Chris Dodd. 'There is no time in history that couldn't have used him, World War 2, the Civil War'.

Yes, that other senator, Byrd from WVA, disavowed his time as a klansman and help pass important civil rights legislation through the end of his careers - as a democrat. He didn't switch parties like the other southern dems, like thurmond.

Face it, the GOP today is the segregationalist party of the 1850-1950's...and for all of the manipulation the GOP takes - gerrymandering, voter suppression, running astrotruf third party candidates to dilute left votes (see Sinema and Jill Stein to name two) at the end of the day, the GOP will not be able to overcome this:

So, in actuality, switching parties may pay off over the next two years, but if the under 30 counteract the over 65 vote, then the Dems win easily for the next several cycles.

The Greatest Generation fought fascism abroad; the young of today fight fascism here at home.