Another pit bull attack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My dog is a mutt and only when we did DNA did we find he has some pit. He has other breeds as well. My dog has not mauled or bitten anyone so tell me how does that make me vile? Btw he only has 33 percent American pit bull terrier.

Judge the actions. Not the breed

Still not responding to the story I posted

NP. None of them ever have. They're super sweet wouldn't hurt a fly, love kids, yadda yadda. Until...they're not. And when that drive kicks in, it goes from 0 to 100 in an instant and is frequently fatal. The stats don't lie. Show me a case of a Golden Retriever who snapped and mauled their owner to death and ate their corpse. Like...one. It hasn't happened. These pit attacks happen DAILY on a global scale.

How can I only judge the actions when it is CLEARLY a breed inherent trait? Is that always activated? No. Of course not. I expect there are some Chihuahuas who are chill and sweet and not massive a-holes, but that's not a general trait. I am HIGHLY judgmental of owners who DON'T judge a breed and adequately assess their ability to handle those traits. That's total newbie, brainwashed advice. You need to accept breed traits and deal with them appropriately, not act like dogs are a blank slate. So yeah, I'd judge someone in a studio getting a cattle dog and I'll judge anyone who is not a VERY experienced owner/trainer getting a Pit. X1000 if they have kids. I've have raised many, many dogs (some for the blind, some for protection, several comfort dogs, etc) and worked with many trainers. I haven't met more than a small handful that have anything good to say about Pits, though they're good for business. Inherently problematic genetically with owners who don't have a clue.

33% is kind of on the cusp in my opinion. That's supermutt territory to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rescued pit saves 4 year old boy!


https://www.foxnews.com/us/rescued-pit-bull-credited-with-saving-4-year-old-suffering-blood-sugar-crash

no comments about this good article, I see.

Only 2 percent of dogs in America are pit bulls. But they commit 72 percent of all fatal attacks. People that own pit bulls are vile human beings

The vast majority of pit bulls and mixes do not kill or maul. Statistically if any dog with some pit that attacks will be counted as a pit regardless of the other breeds that make up the dog.

Why can't you comment on positive stories? And no vile people are the ones that are cruel to these dogs not the people who just own them.

Why do you suffer from such profound sociopathy that - on a thread started about a little girl whose face was half eaten by a pit bull she was gently stroking - you have to try and bright sides these awful dogs? Is it oppositional defiant disorder? Just profoundly stubborn and cold hearted? What is it? Why? Because you can see the phenomenon of people like you posting pictures of their VeLvEt HiPpOs on threads about children being mauled to death. What is broken in you that you can’t see how incredibly vile that is?

First of all the conversation is not solely on this girl. I do have sympathy for her but to blame all dogs because of a few is wrong.

Well nobody is blaming “all dogs” for anything … in fact there’s a very specific breed of dog that is the concern.

[Anonymous]

Scientist here that is a biologist but not even the zoologist kind of biologist. There is SO MUCH evidence that you can breed bad traits into animals. Take the black vs red fox study. Coat color happened to breed with aggressiveness.

For years I handled mice and the black6 would bite the sh&t out of you no matter how well they were handled in advance to try to socialize them. Balbc strain wouldn't harm a fly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rescued pit saves 4 year old boy!


https://www.foxnews.com/us/rescued-pit-bull-credited-with-saving-4-year-old-suffering-blood-sugar-crash

no comments about this good article, I see.

Only 2 percent of dogs in America are pit bulls. But they commit 72 percent of all fatal attacks. People that own pit bulls are vile human beings

The vast majority of pit bulls and mixes do not kill or maul. Statistically if any dog with some pit that attacks will be counted as a pit regardless of the other breeds that make up the dog.

Why can't you comment on positive stories? And no vile people are the ones that are cruel to these dogs not the people who just own them.

Why do you suffer from such profound sociopathy that - on a thread started about a little girl whose face was half eaten by a pit bull she was gently stroking - you have to try and bright sides these awful dogs? Is it oppositional defiant disorder? Just profoundly stubborn and cold hearted? What is it? Why? Because you can see the phenomenon of people like you posting pictures of their VeLvEt HiPpOs on threads about children being mauled to death. What is broken in you that you can’t see how incredibly vile that is?

First of all the conversation is not solely on this girl. I do have sympathy for her but to blame all dogs because of a few is wrong.

Well nobody is blaming “all dogs” for anything … in fact there’s a very specific breed of dog that is the concern.

+1
They’re bad dogs with owners who refuse to recognize pit bull breed traits: gameness. wiling to ignore pain. incredibly high prey drive. loves to attack “weak” people. escape artists. destructive. high anxiety. high resource guarding. low threshold for biting/bite inhibition. These are not good traits. They are great treats if you want to bet on dogs fighting, but they’re terrible for living in polite society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rescued pit saves 4 year old boy!


https://www.foxnews.com/us/rescued-pit-bull-credited-with-saving-4-year-old-suffering-blood-sugar-crash

no comments about this good article, I see.

Because you're too much of an idiot to understand it has NOTHING to do with the probability of a pit killing another human. Your posts are 100% stupid and meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rescued pit saves 4 year old boy!


https://www.foxnews.com/us/rescued-pit-bull-credited-with-saving-4-year-old-suffering-blood-sugar-crash

no comments about this good article, I see.

Because you're too much of an idiot to understand it has NOTHING to do with the probability of a pit killing another human. Your posts are 100% stupid and meaningless.

Hmm very mature. It has everything to do since you claim pit bulls are evil and yet here is a story that challenges your belief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have not read the posts in this thread.

OP: I have two thoughts:

1) A 3 year old dog is not a puppy;

2) Kill all dogs who have 25% or more pit bull in them.

And, yes, I have adopted "pit mixes" and kept both until natural death 17 years later.

They are killers no matter how much love & affection is bestowed upon them.

You are not in charge. You are a terrible human and I would never let anyone murder my dog who has done nothing.

[Anonymous]

I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

Well thank goodness you are not in charge. Most mixes aren't " bred'" so therefore your theory that they are bred for attacking is wrong since it random.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

Well thank goodness you are not in charge. Most mixes aren't " bred'" so therefore your theory that they are bred for attacking is wrong since it random.

'Breeding' happens over generations, 100+ years in many cases. The fact that 80% of dogs are spayed or neutered in the US but only 20% of Pits are (way to go guys! Seriously, responsible owners here!) and the latest iteration is "random" doesn't negate the long-term genetics of breeding dogs for a purpose. And that purpose is bloodsport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

Well thank goodness you are not in charge. Most mixes aren't " bred'" so therefore your theory that they are bred for attacking is wrong since it random.

What a simpleton. It fits though with Pit owners, their dogs are generally stupid and aggressive and the owners follow that pattern. Do better. You don't see this level of idiocy with owners of other potentially dangerous breeds, you really don't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

Well thank goodness you are not in charge. Most mixes aren't " bred'" so therefore your theory that they are bred for attacking is wrong since it random.

What a simpleton. It fits though with Pit owners, their dogs are generally stupid and aggressive and the owners follow that pattern. Do better. You don't see this level of idiocy with owners of other potentially dangerous breeds, you really don't.

Really with any other challenging breed, not even just dangerous breeds, you see people being very deliberate. “This is a wickedly smart dog that needs a specific task and x amount of hours of exercise a day, do not get this amazing dog if you can’t provide that…” or “this dog requires owners who know what they’re doing and…” it really is only pit bull owners who excuse the laundry list of limitations and difficulties of this horrific breed saying that this dog is perfect for everyone. Indeed, pit bull advocates even try to pretend that there is no such thing as a pit bull!

[Anonymous]

Pit bull rips his owner’s arm off after owner attempts to protect a woman attacked by the dog in his home: https://www.journal-news.com/news/2-injured-in-west-chester-twp-dog-attack/KUGAWCFLLVF7JFVWNGFCOCVJXM/

This is not normal animal behavior. I can’t imagine another breed with this level of insatiable blood lust. Attacking someone in their own home and then ripping off your owner’s arm? I can’t wait to hear how that’s acceptable because reasons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think all dogs with more than 50 % pit should be put in special kennels and not permitted in family homes. You can go visit your pit there.

I agree with PP who says any dog owner that doesn’t pay attention to breed traits is a bad dog owner. It’s true of beagles, collies, German shepherds, terriers, and retrievers — you need to know what they were bred for and give them a life that is consistent with that.

Well thank goodness you are not in charge. Most mixes aren't " bred'" so therefore your theory that they are bred for attacking is wrong since it random.

What a simpleton. It fits though with Pit owners, their dogs are generally stupid and aggressive and the owners follow that pattern. Do better. You don't see this level of idiocy with owners of other potentially dangerous breeds, you really don't.

And pray tell me how many dog owners with pit bulls have you interviewed to get your statistics? My dog is smart and I've been training him since he was 3 months old. Right now we are doing agility and yes I neutered him.

There are plenty of idiot dog owners with all sorts of dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dog is a mutt and only when we did DNA did we find he has some pit. He has other breeds as well. My dog has not mauled or bitten anyone so tell me how does that make me vile? Btw he only has 33 percent American pit bull terrier.

Judge the actions. Not the breed

Still not responding to the story I posted

NP. None of them ever have. They're super sweet wouldn't hurt a fly, love kids, yadda yadda. Until...they're not. And when that drive kicks in, it goes from 0 to 100 in an instant and is frequently fatal. The stats don't lie. Show me a case of a Golden Retriever who snapped and mauled their owner to death and ate their corpse. Like...one. It hasn't happened. These pit attacks happen DAILY on a global scale.

How can I only judge the actions when it is CLEARLY a breed inherent trait? Is that always activated? No. Of course not. I expect there are some Chihuahuas who are chill and sweet and not massive a-holes, but that's not a general trait. I am HIGHLY judgmental of owners who DON'T judge a breed and adequately assess their ability to handle those traits. That's total newbie, brainwashed advice. You need to accept breed traits and deal with them appropriately, not act like dogs are a blank slate. So yeah, I'd judge someone in a studio getting a cattle dog and I'll judge anyone who is not a VERY experienced owner/trainer getting a Pit. X1000 if they have kids. I've have raised many, many dogs (some for the blind, some for protection, several comfort dogs, etc) and worked with many trainers. I haven't met more than a small handful that have anything good to say about Pits, though they're good for business. Inherently problematic genetically with owners who don't have a clue.

33% is kind of on the cusp in my opinion. That's supermutt territory to me.

All dogs give warnings but people choose to ignore. Think about it. Would an person admit they ignored the warnings?