Another pit bull attack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently[/quote]

Yeah, a lot are actually. There are many, many "breeders' who are doing exactly that. Dog fighting is alive and well in this country and around the world. Take a gander down Google and see what turns up. Throw in some words like "biddable" and "champion" and you'll find a slew of breeders looking for all of these traits.

To your second point, that is also inaccurate. Or rather, it's conflated. Dogs in the US generally have a 80% spay/neuter rate overall (which makes sense!) Bully breeds are at about 20%. It's a very, very stark difference that has allowed them to proliferate ore than they ever should have given normal standards. This might actually be where the owners come in not the dogs! The owners apparently SUCK roundly for this to be the current situation. They're low-lifes.

Listen, I get it. You're probably a well meaning white lady who likes to put your Pittie baby in flower crowns and pajamas and act like it's the best thing ever. I hope that works for you. If it doesn't I gueess we can slander you online as vicious abuser?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.

Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?

The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”

Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not

That analogy makes no sense. Humans don't train guns and then guns just go around suddenly shooting humans. Humans have to be handling guns for them to shoot. Dogs are autonomous; they choose to attack or not. Training can affect that, sure, but it's still the dog itself that attacks. And some dogs DO attack for 'no reason' (and by no reason we mean 'no reason, we, as a human, comprehend' because the dog certainly has a reason).

You're also off base with thinking that all pit attacks are by mistreated dogs or dogs trained to attack specifically. Many of them are family owned dogs that just kill one day.

I personally, blame both the dog and the owner when a dog attacks. However, I also understand that a pit attack is going to almost always be worse.

For pit mixes, I think it depends on the head on the dog. Pit mixes that have lab or shepherd head and jaws I don't think are as dangerous as they won't have the same bite as a mix that has the typical pit jaw makeup.

You don't believe that dogs being starved beaten and chained in the backyard wouldn't be more inclined to attack? And i didnt bring uo the gun analogy. Guns arent alive. The way a human treats the dog is the way the dog will be...same way parents teach kids to be racists will be racists.

Lastly your point about the head is laughable. Please provide evidence of your "theory"

This is actually a really sick way of thinking about this. I'm not sure why it seems worse to blame the dogs or the breeds than the humans, but we have seen countless attacks by these dogs where they have been raised in loving homes, often from puppyhood, who have still snapped (See the TN family with the XL bullies who went about family annihilation or the rescue volunteer who went on a walk with her babies who ate her) These people are always online as big supporters of these dogs who would NEVER hurt a fly. Then they snap and you same supporters suggest it MUST be due to being "starved and beaten and chained in a yard?' You're the first to turn on each other but it is NEVER the dog! It's like a cult and it's antisocial towards humans and all other animals at this point to have that view. I worked in rescue for years, there are SO many wonderful people who are lovely owners who believe everything you proselytize and get their pit pups and end up paying for it. We get it though, these dogs over all other dogs, cats, etc. These dogs over other humans.

This is all so well put.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

Yeah, a lot are actually. There are many, many "breeders' who are doing exactly that. Dog fighting is alive and well in this country and around the world. Take a gander down Google and see what turns up. Throw in some words like "biddable" and "champion" and you'll find a slew of breeders looking for all of these traits.

To your second point, that is also inaccurate. Or rather, it's conflated. Dogs in the US generally have a 80% spay/neuter rate overall (which makes sense!) Bully breeds are at about 20%. It's a very, very stark difference that has allowed them to proliferate ore than they ever should have given normal standards. This might actually be where the owners come in not the dogs! The owners apparently SUCK roundly for this to be the current situation. They're low-lifes.

Listen, I get it. You're probably a well meaning white lady who likes to put your Pittie baby in flower crowns and pajamas and act like it's the best thing ever. I hope that works for you. If it doesn't I gueess we can slander you online as vicious abuser?

Nah, then it’s the previous owner’s fault.

Thousands upon thousands of dollars people spend trying to fix the behaviors of these dogs not intended for companionship. They’re just such unfit dogs, and watching people throw themselves at them trying to fix them is just weird. Like the women who write to serial killers; why? You think you can fix that? You want to bring that into your life, into everyone else’s lives? Some animals aren’t fixable. Instead of populating the world with these hair trigger maully dogs, why not spay/neuter them and BE the dogs that show aggression? Remember how it used to be, how dogs that bit ceased to exist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.

Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?

The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”

Agreed. It’s not bad guns, it’s bad owners!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.

Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?

The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”

Agreed. It’s not bad guns, it’s bad owners!

You guys have really bad logic. Guns are not alive and so you can not compare guns and dog ownership.

Owner behavior does affect dog behavior. If you do not train them, If you do not socialize them, If you abuse and mistreat them than you will get anxious and scared dogs who will bite. Simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#

Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.

If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.

Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently[/quote]

Yeah, a lot are actually. There are many, many "breeders' who are doing exactly that. Dog fighting is alive and well in this country and around the world. Take a gander down Google and see what turns up. Throw in some words like "biddable" and "champion" and you'll find a slew of breeders looking for all of these traits.

To your second point, that is also inaccurate. Or rather, it's conflated. Dogs in the US generally have a 80% spay/neuter rate overall (which makes sense!) Bully breeds are at about 20%. It's a very, very stark difference that has allowed them to proliferate ore than they ever should have given normal standards. This might actually be where the owners come in not the dogs! The owners apparently SUCK roundly for this to be the current situation. They're low-lifes.

Listen, I get it. You're probably a well meaning white lady who likes to put your Pittie baby in flower crowns and pajamas and act like it's the best thing ever. I hope that works for you. If it doesn't I gueess we can slander you online as vicious abuser?

Bad dog owners aren't on here trying to defend pit bulls and pit bull mixes. I do not dress up my dog in people clothing. I have trained and loved my dog and will continue to do so because I am a responsible dog owner. These dogs are the problem. It is the owners. Banning dog breeds you don't like will change nothing. I am wasting my breath honestly and so I would rather educate pit bull owners on how to be responsible and work on getting those bad owners fined and punished.

[Anonymous]

Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

Because it looks about average for a “trained” pit bull. These aren’t bright dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

I'm a trainer. I love the pits because they pay my mortgage and it's basically unending funds. But...they're dumb. Their nature is shitty. They're not all that trainable, they're mostly nature not nurture. I'd never own one myself and they don't do well in sports. People always harp on "training" like it's sime panacea you fo and all is well. Pits don't train easily. The average person should not have one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

Dogs.are.not.people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

I'm a trainer. I love the pits because they pay my mortgage and it's basically unending funds. But...they're dumb. Their nature is shitty. They're not all that trainable, they're mostly nature not nurture. I'd never own one myself and they don't do well in sports. People always harp on "training" like it's sime panacea you fo and all is well. Pits don't train easily. The average person should not have one.

You're clearly not a trainer or at best a "trainer" that hasn't worked with pits because if you were you wouldn't posit most of what you've said above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another one of these lovable nanny dogs taking good care of a 2-year old:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12784423/Texas-pit-bull-attack-child.html

My point was proven...abandoned and mistreated. I feel for the boy

Other dogs in the neighborhood are. Not that particular dog.

And why do so many people get sick of these dogs if they’re soooo sweet and perfect and trainable? That’s weird, right? Maybe these dogs are as unlikable as we think they are. Maybe people can’t take their weird skin conditions and odors. Maybe they’re sick of their kids getting “nipped.”

What makes you think this dog was trained? If you haven't tried how can you say they are not trainable? You know we used to think some people couldn't learn so we put them in institutions

I'm a trainer. I love the pits because they pay my mortgage and it's basically unending funds. But...they're dumb. Their nature is shitty. They're not all that trainable, they're mostly nature not nurture. I'd never own one myself and they don't do well in sports. People always harp on "training" like it's sime panacea you fo and all is well. Pits don't train easily. The average person should not have one.

You're clearly not a trainer or at best a "trainer" that hasn't worked with pits because if you were you wouldn't posit most of what you've said above.

Why? Because their experience is in contradiction to your feelings?