Fairfax Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the guy went after the aupair first and the mother stepped in and got stabbed. Maybe the guy was stalking the aupair.

I also read somewhere, but can't find it now, so not sure of the validity, that the aupair referred to the alleged stabber as "my friend" when she called the police the 2nd time.

Sugar daddy since being an Au pair is basically shave labor?

[Anonymous]

The Fairfax County Police Department said in its press release yesterday that the man who entered the home was apparently unknown to the husband. This contradicts the information in the news the prior day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the guy went after the aupair first and the mother stepped in and got stabbed. Maybe the guy was stalking the aupair.

I also read somewhere, but can't find it now, so not sure of the validity, that the aupair referred to the alleged stabber as "my friend" when she called the police the 2nd time.

No, she was referring to the woman, her employer. She was in shock and English is her 2nd language.

From the FCPD blog:
Just after 8 a.m., officers responded to the home after a 911 call was received where a woman stated her friend was hurt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Fairfax County Police Department said in its press release yesterday that the man who entered the home was apparently unknown to the husband. This contradicts the information in the news the prior day.

Good catch!

[Anonymous]

I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's hard to make sense of, if he seemed unstable why was he around the home, known to au pair, etc. It's not like a crazy family member, it's an ex.

Very sad.

Who said he was unstable? Was that reported somewhere?

Given that he allegedly STABBED SOMEONE TO DEATH, characterizing him as "unstable" does not seem a stretch to me. YMMV.

A PP described his social media in ways that also seem odd, and using violent language, esp for a 39 year old. Also seems "unstable" to me, but, again, YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the guy went after the aupair first and the mother stepped in and got stabbed. Maybe the guy was stalking the aupair.

I also read somewhere, but can't find it now, so not sure of the validity, that the aupair referred to the alleged stabber as "my friend" when she called the police the 2nd time.

No, she was referring to the woman, her employer. She was in shock and English is her 2nd language.

From the FCPD blog:
Just after 8 a.m., officers responded to the home after a 911 call was received where a woman stated her friend was hurt.

Got it, that makes sense. Thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

But all of that would transpire in 1, maybe 2 minutes. Not 15.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

But all of that would transpire in 1, maybe 2 minutes. Not 15.

You can’t assume that. He may have ranted and threatened for 15 minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

But all of that would transpire in 1, maybe 2 minutes. Not 15.

You can’t assume that. He may have ranted and threatened for 15 minutes.

And you can't assume he ranted for 15 minutes. Thew action itself takes no more than 2 minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

But all of that would transpire in 1, maybe 2 minutes. Not 15.

You can’t assume that. He may have ranted and threatened for 15 minutes.

The important thing is that had 911 been able to trace the first call they could’ve been there before the second call.

[Anonymous]

PP who thinks murdered male was BF of au pair. Could this be a stalking situation? The homeowners confronted the BF or were surprised to see him? The au pairs’ “friend” was attempting a break -in?

This is how my mind works. Just tossing this out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP who thinks murdered male was BF of au pair. Could this be a stalking situation? The homeowners confronted the BF or were surprised to see him? The au pairs’ “friend” was attempting a break -in?

This is how my mind works. Just tossing this out there.

That was one of my initial thoughts, but the kid being removed and the husband not cooperating makes me think there is more to the story

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP who thinks murdered male was BF of au pair. Could this be a stalking situation? The homeowners confronted the BF or were surprised to see him? The au pairs’ “friend” was attempting a break -in?

This is how my mind works. Just tossing this out there.

That was one of my initial thoughts, but the kid being removed and the husband not cooperating makes me think there is more to the story

Waiting for an attorney is not “not cooperating “. It’s the correct thing to do. Removing the kid makes sense until they can determine she’s safe with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the first dropped call is weird. He probably had a knife and said “hang up the phone or I’ll stab your boss (or you.” so she did. Then the husband shot him and she called 911 at that point.

But all of that would transpire in 1, maybe 2 minutes. Not 15.

You can’t assume that. He may have ranted and threatened for 15 minutes.

The important thing is that had 911 been able to trace the first call they could’ve been there before the second call.

True. Was it too short of a call to trace?