|
Op here again. I just changed lenders and loan terms at the last minute...I need to have the home reappraised and get reapproved but I don't see why I wouldn't, since I just got approved with the other lender. This oen is 30 year fixed at 5.75 but buying it down with points (2.835)... Still this lender was able to get my monthly payments down about even on the P&I as the ARM amount. The APR is higher, total interest percentage is higher... but I think this meets my needs for now. (Oddly they estimated the T&I/escrow part to be higher than my other lender, so overall monthly payment looks lower. by $75 too..) I still feel a little unsure about whether this is the right move but feel that it probably still is a decent calculated risk. And I could still refi later if rates drop further again.
For people suggestion assumption... assuming the existing loan won't work for me (it's VA so he would have to give up that entitlement and there's just no way that's happening) Time to go drum up that side hustle work... |
What? My sibling has a 26 year old and a 10 year old, with two kids in between, all with the same spouse. |
| An ARM is a really bad idea as you never own the house and just pay interest. You are getting really bad long term advice. |
If they have 50-50 custody and equal income this isn't going to happen. |
+1 this is an unrealistic outcome in most divorces |
Sounds like a good plan. |
You can’t compare cases like this. See bolded word. Some people agree to far more than they need to - many don’t. |
Could he deduct such amount from child support? Surely your attorneys could come up with a settlement agreement that specifies this arrangement? |
I've found that people who agree to more than they need to are usually the one who is trying to leave the marriage. In this case I (op) am the one trying to leave. |
You are confusing ARM with interest only mortgages. ARM does have principal component |
|
Of course not. But buying now is not ideal. She will pay more for less. Better to stay and sell years from now than buy another property. |
She doesn’t have to buy immediately. Rent & wait until next year & see what happens to the market. Unless at least one of the partners is wealthy, trying to sustain two households vs. one requires compromises. Too many women compromise their future to try to avoid changing their current lifestyle. The real mistake pp made was not giving up her marital house, it was trying to replace it kind. Of course you should keep the house if you’re just going to go out and buy an equally expensive one. And as pp discovered, a “cheaper” house isn’t “cheaper” if the price is lower because it needs a ton of immediate work. Of all the options, that’s the dumbest. These women get divorced, but want to pretend that nothing’s really changed. It doesn’t work, and it’s an expensive delusion. |
Well, *this* Op isn't "pretending nothing's really changed." Obviously I'll still be paying 1200 more per month which is not an insignificant amount and I have strategies for dealing with it, but yes it is all a risk. Sure selling and cashing out then renting is less of a risk, but it's also a possible missed opportunity to build wealth over the long haul which ALSO could screw over "these divorced women" - which I have also seen happen and would like to avoid. So I think it's all about taking a calculated risk and reducing the potential for things to go completely awry right? But yes, divorce is a financial hit. I feel fortunate that at least I have a good stable job with amazing benefits. I think this thread has probably run its course... thank you everyone who weighed in, including the naysayers. Maybe I'll report back in a couple years... |
Good luck OP! Wishing you and your family health and happiness as you move forward. |